Will Naypyidaw's Olive Branch Bear Fruit?
covering burma and southeast asia
Tuesday, May 07, 2024
Burma

NEWS ANALYSIS

Will Naypyidaw's Olive Branch Bear Fruit?


By BA KAUNG Monday, August 15, 2011


Burma’s Labor and Social Welfare Minister Aung Kyi, right, and democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi, left, listen to questions from the media during a press conference on Aug. 12. (Photo: AP)
COMMENTS (10)
RECOMMEND (202)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Two closed-door meetings between Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of Burma’s pro-democracy movement, and Aung Kyi, a Burmese government minister, which were immediately followed by Suu Kyi’s unhindered public tour of a town near Rangoon on Sunday, have generated optimism among her supporters that a rapprochement is under way between the democratic opposition and the new Burmese government.

“There is some progress between us and the government, and Daw Suu has asked the minister for a timeframe for the future meetings," said an official from Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD).

Suu Kyi and the government have kept the details of their discussions secret thus far, but sources said that the topics of the two meetings included the release of political prisoners, the armed conflicts in ethnic areas and the status of the NLD, which was officially dissolved last year for failing to register under the election laws.

As a direct result of the meetings, some of the government’s 2,000 plus political prisoners are expected to be released within weeks, according to inside party sources. It is unclear, however, whether those prisoners being released will include prominent dissidents such as former student leader Min Ko Naing.

But even if some prisoners are actually released during this period of apparent détente between the government and Suu Kyi, past periods of leniency have frequently been followed by crackdowns, such as the Depayin massacre and re-arrest of Suu Kyi in 2003.
 
So the question remains: How substantive will the government’s olive branches will be?

One clear indication will be whether the government officially acknowledges the legal existence of the NLD as a political party, with Suu Kyi as its leader. The NLD has exhausted the country's legal methods for obtaining renewed legal recognition following its dissolution by the government last year, and have even considered enlisting the help of the UN on the issue.

On Friday, Government information minister Kyaw Hsan said at a press conference in Naypyidaw that the NLD needs to register through the formal procedures.

The move will require the party to agree to a condition under the election laws that states the party will act in accordance with the 2008 Constitution, which was drafted by the previous military regime and the NLD has dismissed as undemocratic—in fact it was the primary reason the party boycotted the 2010 election.

While Suu Kyi has urged her followers to regard the current talks with cautious optimism, there is concern that the government might be using her for public relations purposes only.

Some observers point out that in the coming months, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) will make a final decision on whether to award Burma its 2014 chair, and the government may be using the meetings with Suu Kyi to persuade Asean to act in its favor.

If Burma is given the Asean chair, it will provide much-needed legitimacy for Naypyidaw's military-dominated government, which came to power through a heavily-criticized election. And because some Asean members and the association’s most influential Western partners have said the case must be decided based on Burma's political and economic reforms, the government is motivated to put on a good face at this time.

“They are using her [Suu Kyi] as much as they can, as they seek normalization of their deepening and “constitutionalized” class rule as a military-business class in terms of international relations,” said Dr. Zarni, a visiting fellow with the London School of Economics and Political Science.

“They may have figured out that her popularity is that of a pop star, as opposed to a revolutionary figure who will inspire the masses to serious and sustained revolt,” he said. “So the generals obviously have rethought and reworked their approach to containing her.”

In another apparent attempt to project a reformist image, the Burmese government has reportedly sought the help of the International Monetary Fund in modernizing its currency exchange system. And in a related event, the government information minister announced on Friday that the country will withdraw foreign exchange certificates (FECs) from the market. 

However, while talk from Naypyidaw related to certain reform topics has become louder, the armed clashes between government troops and the ethnic Kachin Independence Army (KIA) in the north show no signs of slowing.

There is also a reported division among the government’s top leadership, consisting of a reformist group led by President Thein Sein and a conservative hard-line camp led by Vice-President Tin Aung Myint Oo.



1  |  2  next page »

COMMENTS (10)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

KKK Wrote:
17/08/2011
Yes, we will soon to see the poisonous fruits bearing on the olive branch.

Oo Maung gyi Wrote:
16/08/2011
It is life and death poblem for President Thein Sein government to get recognitation from out side world including Asean chairmanship for him is also badly needed for his survival. Anyway, as for opposition groups, it is very important to release all political prisoners is a prioty iussue. It is requie to form a NATIONAL GOVERNMENT(NG) is a must, so that it will be easier to get recognition from global community.Daw Suu's cooperation with the government is an immediate essential factor for the government. Without Daw Suu's participation under NG how can ethnic group and government troop fighting will stop is a question mark.

Kyaw Wrote:
16/08/2011
The assassins are trying to negotiate with the survivor of the assassination.
They have committed unspeakable and unbelievable crimes in the human history such as deny the votes of the whole Nation and assassinated their leaders. Now they need helps from their victim badly.

Rene Popovsky Wrote:
16/08/2011
Let’s hope that this positive momentum for change will accelerate and bear fruit. There are many obstacles, as this article shows, mainly from conservative politicians. Also there must be urgency in unifying the country, bring all those ethnic minorities together, to form a nation, either unitary or federal, it is up to all people living in state of Myanmar, only then , peace and prosperity may come.

TW Wrote:
16/08/2011
Don't trust .
That's just for show.

Moe Aung Wrote:
16/08/2011
We might be witnessing if you can't fight 'em join 'em in reverse. The co-optation of ASSK, whose shining star can no longer be extinguished brutally since they've turned 'democratic', seems afoot.

If the release of political prisoners including the 88 generation leaders actually happens, it's a step forward. Contradictions both built-in and add-ons within the system will work through their way. Only the last time Khin Nyunt tried it his way, he came to grief.

Mualcin Wrote:
16/08/2011
The leopard will never change its spots, and Burmese military will never change its unworthiness.

Tom Tun Wrote:
16/08/2011
There is still confusion and uncertainty over the direction Burma's government is heading, as well as its motivations. I can agree with that statement. However the history has taught us that military leadership actions are all about deception to hold on to power. It will be little improvement for ordinary citizen of Burma and it will be little improvement for political situation with Ethnic minority. 2008 constitution is an obsticle for Burma reconciiliation and creation of peace with ethnic brotherins.

Dave Wrote:
16/08/2011
It's a fascinating juncture which the country is at right now, as even this short article makes clear; take care though, in all your reporting of moves and strategies of the top brass (on both sides), not to forget the everyday experience of the ordinary person. That is political reality.

Tettoe Aung Wrote:
16/08/2011
Don't put your money on yet. Just because he's a minister that doesn't mean that his words and promises are worth 'trusting'. Politics in general has declined into the status of 'gutter politics' in particular with the reputation of the military regime is the thing to go by, my advice will be, 'let alone fruit, we don't even see the bud yet.' They have to come up to the standard of what Daw Suu referred to as 'political integrity' first.

more articles in this section