Similarities and Contrasts Between 1990 and 2010: But Will the Fundamentals Change?
covering burma and southeast asia
Saturday, April 27, 2024
Election watch

Similarities and Contrasts Between 1990 and 2010: But Will the Fundamentals Change?


By AUNG NAING OO Monday, March 8, 2010


COMMENTS (2)
RECOMMEND (585)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 2)

Besides Aung San Suu Kyi, they may include key figures such as Min Ko Naing, Khun Htun Oo  and others if not all currently under detention.

Not all conditions are similar. Back in 1990, Burma did not have Swan Err Shin or the Union Solidarity and Development Association (USDA)—the two groups often accused of harassing the opposition activists.

In 2010, unlike 1990, the prospect of the USDA transforming itself into a government political party looms large. A mass organization with abundant resources and nation-wide membership, it will be a threat to opposition’s attempt to wrestle any meaningful win in the election.

And its role in violence against NLD and other opposition activists is one of the key concerns on the minds of the opposition politicians. Presumably in a similar fashion, the Swan Err Shin in its role outside the constitutional and legal framework may be used in harassing opposition candidates.

 
These possible threats or acts of violence may affect the outcome because many would-be parliamentarians may stay steer clear of direct standoff with such organizations by not contesting the elections.  

If these concerns come to be true, even if the elections turn out to be free and fair on election day as Senior Than Shwe often promises, the election results then—fundamental issue in an election—may still tip towards the SPDC or its allies.



« previous  1  |  2  | 

COMMENTS (2)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
11/03/2010
We thank IRRAWADDY for publishing our comment. We have only LOVE for our country; we do not condemn any of our people, even the military because we have been explained by our claimant in exile to the throne of Burma Shwebomin II how our colonial past had shaped our preseent. But our would be king also explained that the colonial past does not have to be the chain at our ankles stopping us gaining real freedom and democracy.
Our would be king said through patriotism, unity, intelligence and learning we can have our destiny in our hand.

Please be mindful of ex-coloniser and new imperialist obstructing our progress. Our people need real education. IRRAWADDY can play a very important part.
We are so relieved that:(a) our would be king has critical intelligence to see what no one else can sees, e.g the flawed 1990 election results. (b) Suu Kyi, a puppet in our opinion, cannot be our boss.
Thanks again IRRAWADDY for your MORAL COURAGE.W hope that you will be enobled as 'Ashins' by our Monarch.
With metta/myitta.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
10/03/2010
1.The elections of 1990 were held to pave the way for multi-party democracy. The intention was genuine. WHY?
2.The Butcher of Rangoon, Sein Lwin, henchman of Farguang Shu Maung, had murdered thousands of unarmed students and civilians in 1988; the bloodiest savagery commited by MI of BSPP regime under tutelage of a low life Shu Maung;he was put under house arrest!Burma was in turmoil;Mark II military regime, SLORC,had no choice but to save the state by military coup on military-back socialist/communist BSPP regime that had ruined the economy.By 1990 aspirations for democracy returned. BUT
3.Without clearly explaining to the people and the world true objective elections were held. OBJECTIVE was
4. To convene an NATIONAL ASSEMBLY to write a constitution and then hold elections again to form a parliament with 'executive power' ie the majority party as government. IN ANY CASE
5.Without the separation of the powers,namely, legislature, judiciar & executive, things would turn out wrong.

more articles in this section