ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
The Lady’s Turn
By KYAW ZWA MOE Thursday, July 7, 2011


COMMENTS (16)
RECOMMEND (422)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Here in Thailand, history was made on July 3 when the Pheu Thai Party’s landslide victory left Yingluck Shinawatra, a woman who had just recently entered politics, primed to become the country’s first female prime minister. But back in Burma, the Lady who has been leading her country’s pro-democracy struggle for two decades appears unlikely to ever reach the same pinnacle of the political system.

While many, if not most, believe that Yingluck’s victory can be attributed to the fact that she is the sister of Thaksin Shinawatra, Thailand’s former prime minister who was ousted in a 2006 military coup, the fact remains that she is a dynamic new political presence who will join a small group of women among the leaders of the world’s 190 countries.

“I like that she is a woman,” Suu Kyi said when congratulating Yingluck on her overwhelming victory. “We also have to welcome the government democratically elected by the people.”

Kyaw Zwa Moe is managing editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

Thailand’s political environment favored its first female prime minister-to-be: the election was free and fair; the ruling Democrat Party accepted defeat when it lost at the polls; and the military promised not to proceed with a rumored coup.

In contrast, Suu Kyi was excluded from Burma’s 2010 election, which was anything but free and fair, and previously, when she and her party won the 1990 election in a landslide even greater than Pheu Thai’s, the military refused to honor the results, imprisoned Suu Kyi and began 20 years of oppression that has no end in sight. 

In both 1990 and 2010, the chance for Burma’s people to have a woman leader before Thailand was stolen from them by a clique of ruthless men with no compassion for their country’s citizens. And in the 20 years in between the two “elections,” it became clear that the courage, confidence, commitment and compassion of a female opposition figure could not win out in Burma when the nation’s male leaders refused to give her an opportunity to compete on anything approaching a level playing field.

While that's true in many countries around the globe, it’s truer in Burma, and Suu Kyi is but one of many deserving women who have been actively repressed by the men controlling the country.

Among Burma’s 2,100 political prisoners, there are at least 145 woman political activists serving lengthy terms, according to a statement recently released by the Thailand-based Assistance Association for Political Prisoners—Burma (AAPP). Suu Kyi herself spent 15 years under house arrest after 1989, and the AAPP estimated that since the 1988 nationwide uprising, several hundred women activists have been placed in a cell.

Most of these women were put in prison by the former military regime, but the current quasi-civilian government is keeping them incarcerated. All of them are in prison for the simple fact that they hold different political views than the ruling leaders.

One of the female political prisoners, Nilar Thien, is a courageous activist and the wife of Kyaw Min Yu, who is a leading member of the 88 Generation Students group, which joined the monks in leading the 2007 Revolution and whose membership includes activists that have been at the forefront of the country’s democracy movement since the 1988 nationwide uprising.

I spoke by telephone with Nilar Thein after she went into hiding following the 2007 uprising. At the time, she was the mother of a four-month-old baby daughter who she left behind when the authorities began hunting her.

“I desperately want to get rid of this evil system,” said Nilar Thein. “Only if we end this system will the future of Burma’s people, including my daughter, be bright. I love my daughter, but I had to leave her. I believe she will later understand why.”

Nilar Thein did have a choice about whether to stay away from politics in the interests of her family, or join the movement to bring democracy to Burma. She was well aware of the risks—she had spent nearly nine years in prison in the 1990s—but still took the gamble of participating in the protests.

Sadly, she ultimately lost the bet.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (16)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Adam Selene Wrote:
20/07/2011
Tocharian wrote: "At present, Burma is far away from it and I blame it partly on the corrupt Chinese influence When I say foreign, I normally mean Chinese (there are lots of them in Burma now) not Westerners."

Like many opposition politicians you blame part of the problem on the Chinese "occupation" of Burma. What I don't understand is that the opposition doesn't draw the conclusion that the sanctions should end and that more western influence is needed to balance out that of the Chinese.

Everybody agrees the sanctions didn't work. Also, western companies are more transparent, accountable and the have csr programmes, so they care more about human rights and the communities they operate in. Western competition could mean better prices for the Burmese too.

tocharian Wrote:
20/07/2011
I agree that it is hard to pinpoint the exact roots of political systems that are more egalitarian and democratic and I admit that they are rare in their purest form, but still it is an ideal that most human beings strive for. At present, Burma is far away from it and I blame it partly on the corrupt Chinese influence When I say foreign, I normally mean Chinese (there are lots of them in Burma now) not Westerners.

tabulus Wrote:
15/07/2011
Adame Selene,

You are absolutely right that Burmese seem incapable of weening themselves from their dependence on leaders who like to see themselves as the embodiment of power. But it is ironic that you are wasting your words on Myanmar Patriots, a nobody living in England who thinks he is the king of Burma.

Adam Selene Wrote:
14/07/2011
Myanmar Patriots, I actually didn't write that Myanmar was incapable of democracy. I only said that if Tocharian thought he needed to point out that greed was a western trait (which it ain't) that he should point out also that democracy was instated first in western countries and that our human rights tradition is much stronger too.

One wonders, though, how Myanmar can get rid of its tradition of personalized power. During the Burmese kingdoms all power was concentrated in one person. The same is going on in the junta and even the NLD, which in itself (the party organization) is not democratic at all, at least not to western standards.

Most political leaders think they are nothing if they are not number 1. That's one of the main reasons why many Burmese parties were splitting up in the past.

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
14/07/2011
tocharian Wrote:

13/07/2011
Claiming that "democracy and human rights are Western concepts" is a racist statement.

HEAR HEAR. Correct, Tochi!

Democracy is only recent in modern history. What about Hitler's rise to power through democratic choice of Germans of the time?
and how long had the Western democracies been in existence?

It really is pathetic to say that our people are not capable of conducting democracy. it is purely a cultural issue that can be socially engineered by the right system and institutions.

Adam Selene Wrote:
13/07/2011
Tocharian, your using of the racist card is even plain dumb, as I didn't say democracy was a white invention. Race has nothing to do with it.

To elaborate on my point. Human rights where first enforced in a document after the American and the French revolutions, which are both western countries. And democracy dates back to Athens. The current wave of democracy came about after the 17th century and was a mainly western phenomenon.

So human rights and democracy are mostly western. Or to formulate it sharper, in the west these concepts where adopted legally and practiced in state governance first.

Adam Selene Wrote:
13/07/2011
Tocharian wrote: "Claiming that "democracy and human rights are Western concepts" is a racist statement."

Nope. It's a historically correct statement. Remember the Greek and the period of enlightenment after the middle ages?

It's just too easy to only attribute "greed" to us and label it "foreign to Burma". If you do so please recognize that democracy and human rights are western concepts and currently mostly in full swing in the west.

Burma certainly doesn't have a pretty tradition in these. Personalized power, cronyism, war mongering and inequality aren't the regime's invention. They date back to the dynasties of the Burmese kings.

tocharian Wrote:
13/07/2011
Claiming that "democracy and human rights are Western concepts" is a racist statement.

Adam Selene Wrote:
13/07/2011
Tocharian, you should add also that democracy and human rights are Western concepts, actually foreign to most Asian countries, instead of only bad mouthing us westerners ;-)

And the fact that ASSK is the only opposition leader supported by the West doesn't mean much to me. The West is largely irrelevant to Burma. China and Thailand are much more influential.

The West should stop supporting somebody without a plan (ASSK), enter Burma economically, and start pushing in the right direction this way. God knows the sanctions and supporting ASSK didn't do the trick.

Myat Thu Wrote:
12/07/2011
It is the biggest tragedy of Burma in the last 20 years that, until now, Daw Suu is not allowed to take her rightful position of the head of state or government to lead this country out of acute disunity and abject poverty. The history will hold the coward generals accountable for this. Once she can hold her rightful position, the best and the brightest of this country will come forward to rebuild their country. If, unfortunately, she never become an office holder, the history will still remember her as a great leader in the same league of Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela. I don't see Yingluck can come close to such stature.

tocharian Wrote:
12/07/2011
I am definitely not happy with the way things are going in Burma. Why should I be writing these little comments in the Irrawaddy otherwise?

I am not a member of any political association, but it is clear that ASSK is the only opposition leader that Western countries would support (one reason is her fluent English!). Most Burmese dissidents are NLD supporters and if Burma would ever free itself from the iron grip of these Generals (and their Chinese masters), I am sure a lot of Burmese ex-pats (educated or not) will come home and help build the country. "Greed, Cunningness and Corruption" are foreign characteristics and I hope a future Burma will not be based on those principles anymore but on "the glory of the free human spirit".

Adam Selene Wrote:
11/07/2011
Tocharian wrote: "Adam Selene's English is flawed as well as his facile assessment of the NLD."

Well, I am not a native English speaker. So what's your point?

Do you really think ASSK used her influence to the fullest this last twenty years? She potentially has a big stick, but she never uses it. The NLD even watched from the sidelines during the 2007 protests.

I don't care that she is popular and that people invest their hopes in her. It's not a popularity contest and with the support from the people come responsibilities. I don't see a result. And every time I talk with NLD people I am appalled at the lack of substance, strategy and cunning.

But I guess you're happy the way things are going now, right?

Thin Thin Wrote:
09/07/2011
Adam Selene,

Haven't you seen the kind of support she gets from people when she visited Pagan? It's not that she doesn't have political abilities, but rather, lacks the cunning nature of Than Shwe and shamelessness of his cronies.

So, do not be so naive in your judgement.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
08/07/2011
I don't BUY that crap about Daw Suu is at the MERCY of the THUGS in UNIFORM to take her rightful PLACE and ROLE in Burma's politics and history.

In fact and conversely, they are at HER MERCY today lest they forget.

The POWER STRUGGLE ongoing at Naypyidaw today could certainly TURN THE TABLES on the lot at Naypyidaw as well.

And KIA, KNU and DKBA defying the BGF farce today could be the HARBINGER of BAD DAYS for the BAD GUYS led by Than Shwe/Thein Sein no less.

And Min Aung Naing could THROW IN his lot with Daw Suu in case he wants to REDEEM his PRIDE and PRIZE as a TRUE SON OF the BURMA ARMY founded by late Gen. Aung San.

tocharian Wrote:
08/07/2011
Adam Selene's English is flawed as well as his facile assessment of the NLD.

Adam Selene Wrote:
08/07/2011
Yes, it's time to get rid of "this evil system". But what if the generals really step aside? Anybody who knows the NLD from the inside knows will be appalled at the lack of substance. It's obvious also that ASSK, although very popular, has very little political abilities. She is a symbol, not a politician. Hence the lack of results up to today.

If she ever gets a position in government she will need people around her with policy making abilities and knowledge of governance, economics and finance.

Sadly at the senior level of the NLD these people are nowhere to be found.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.