ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
The Lady’s Turn
By KYAW ZWA MOE Thursday, July 7, 2011


COMMENTS (16)
RECOMMEND (422)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 2)

In September 2008, the junta tracked Nilar Thein down, and she is now serving a 65-year prison term in Thayet Prison in central Burma.

To make a terrible situation even worse, her husband Kyaw Min Yu was already in prison when she was arrested, and is also serving a 65 year-sentence—he is in Taunggyi Prison, Shan State. The activist couple’s four-year-old daughter occasionally travels with her aunt and uncle to visit her mother and father behind bars, but will most likely grow up without their presence.
 
Nilar Thein has been recognized for her bravery and commitment by People in Need, a Czech-based organization who awarded her its Homo Homini prize for her promotion of democracy, human rights and nonviolent solutions to political conflicts. But the award brings no comfort for the suffering she endures due to being separated from her daughter.

Looking back over the struggle of Burmese women in the modern era, many more deserve recognition, because their status in Burmese political society has been suppressed since shortly after the time the country achieved independence.

Even during the British colonial era, women in Burma had more rights than now. In 1929, Hnin Mya became the country’s first woman senator. Then in 1937, a distinguished female doctor named Saw Has was elected and given the prestigious civil honor “Member of the British Empire.” In 1953, five years after Burma gained its independence, the country has had one female minister—Ba Maung Chain—who became the minister representing Karen State.

But since the time of the 1962 military coup staged by the late dictator Ne Win, the role of women in Burmese politics has been almost nonexistent, due primarily to the fact that each successive government has been led by military and ex-military men.

Even in the new “civilian” government, few women have had the opportunity to crack Burma’s iron ceiling. In the 2010 election, there were only 20 women among the 659 persons elected to Parliament, and 14 of those women belonged to the military-controlled Union Solidarity and Development Party.

The daughters of three former prime ministers, known as the “three princesses,” took part in the election, but each was defeated by a USDP candidate. Recently, all three said that they would not contest a by-election slated to be held later this year, explaining that although they took part in the November 2010 election in the belief it would create some political space, they didn’t see that happening once the new government was formed. 

Under these circumstances, it is highly unlikely that Suu Kyi or any of her female colleagues will take office or play a crucial role in Burma’s government in the foreseeable future. While their courage, confidence, commitment and compassion have won more than enough hearts and minds among the Burmese people to secure a landslide victory far exceeding Yingluck’s in Thailand, the insecure men who control Burma show no signs of allowing anyone outside their close-minded clique, let alone a female pro-democracy leader, to lead the nation.

The men in Naypyidaw, however, have failed miserably and run their country into the ground. It’s time for them to step aside and give the Lady a chance.



  1  |  2  | 



COMMENTS (16)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Adam Selene Wrote:
20/07/2011
Tocharian wrote: "At present, Burma is far away from it and I blame it partly on the corrupt Chinese influence When I say foreign, I normally mean Chinese (there are lots of them in Burma now) not Westerners."

Like many opposition politicians you blame part of the problem on the Chinese "occupation" of Burma. What I don't understand is that the opposition doesn't draw the conclusion that the sanctions should end and that more western influence is needed to balance out that of the Chinese.

Everybody agrees the sanctions didn't work. Also, western companies are more transparent, accountable and the have csr programmes, so they care more about human rights and the communities they operate in. Western competition could mean better prices for the Burmese too.

tocharian Wrote:
20/07/2011
I agree that it is hard to pinpoint the exact roots of political systems that are more egalitarian and democratic and I admit that they are rare in their purest form, but still it is an ideal that most human beings strive for. At present, Burma is far away from it and I blame it partly on the corrupt Chinese influence When I say foreign, I normally mean Chinese (there are lots of them in Burma now) not Westerners.

tabulus Wrote:
15/07/2011
Adame Selene,

You are absolutely right that Burmese seem incapable of weening themselves from their dependence on leaders who like to see themselves as the embodiment of power. But it is ironic that you are wasting your words on Myanmar Patriots, a nobody living in England who thinks he is the king of Burma.

Adam Selene Wrote:
14/07/2011
Myanmar Patriots, I actually didn't write that Myanmar was incapable of democracy. I only said that if Tocharian thought he needed to point out that greed was a western trait (which it ain't) that he should point out also that democracy was instated first in western countries and that our human rights tradition is much stronger too.

One wonders, though, how Myanmar can get rid of its tradition of personalized power. During the Burmese kingdoms all power was concentrated in one person. The same is going on in the junta and even the NLD, which in itself (the party organization) is not democratic at all, at least not to western standards.

Most political leaders think they are nothing if they are not number 1. That's one of the main reasons why many Burmese parties were splitting up in the past.

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
14/07/2011
tocharian Wrote:

13/07/2011
Claiming that "democracy and human rights are Western concepts" is a racist statement.

HEAR HEAR. Correct, Tochi!

Democracy is only recent in modern history. What about Hitler's rise to power through democratic choice of Germans of the time?
and how long had the Western democracies been in existence?

It really is pathetic to say that our people are not capable of conducting democracy. it is purely a cultural issue that can be socially engineered by the right system and institutions.

Adam Selene Wrote:
13/07/2011
Tocharian, your using of the racist card is even plain dumb, as I didn't say democracy was a white invention. Race has nothing to do with it.

To elaborate on my point. Human rights where first enforced in a document after the American and the French revolutions, which are both western countries. And democracy dates back to Athens. The current wave of democracy came about after the 17th century and was a mainly western phenomenon.

So human rights and democracy are mostly western. Or to formulate it sharper, in the west these concepts where adopted legally and practiced in state governance first.

Adam Selene Wrote:
13/07/2011
Tocharian wrote: "Claiming that "democracy and human rights are Western concepts" is a racist statement."

Nope. It's a historically correct statement. Remember the Greek and the period of enlightenment after the middle ages?

It's just too easy to only attribute "greed" to us and label it "foreign to Burma". If you do so please recognize that democracy and human rights are western concepts and currently mostly in full swing in the west.

Burma certainly doesn't have a pretty tradition in these. Personalized power, cronyism, war mongering and inequality aren't the regime's invention. They date back to the dynasties of the Burmese kings.

tocharian Wrote:
13/07/2011
Claiming that "democracy and human rights are Western concepts" is a racist statement.

Adam Selene Wrote:
13/07/2011
Tocharian, you should add also that democracy and human rights are Western concepts, actually foreign to most Asian countries, instead of only bad mouthing us westerners ;-)

And the fact that ASSK is the only opposition leader supported by the West doesn't mean much to me. The West is largely irrelevant to Burma. China and Thailand are much more influential.

The West should stop supporting somebody without a plan (ASSK), enter Burma economically, and start pushing in the right direction this way. God knows the sanctions and supporting ASSK didn't do the trick.

Myat Thu Wrote:
12/07/2011
It is the biggest tragedy of Burma in the last 20 years that, until now, Daw Suu is not allowed to take her rightful position of the head of state or government to lead this country out of acute disunity and abject poverty. The history will hold the coward generals accountable for this. Once she can hold her rightful position, the best and the brightest of this country will come forward to rebuild their country. If, unfortunately, she never become an office holder, the history will still remember her as a great leader in the same league of Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela. I don't see Yingluck can come close to such stature.

tocharian Wrote:
12/07/2011
I am definitely not happy with the way things are going in Burma. Why should I be writing these little comments in the Irrawaddy otherwise?

I am not a member of any political association, but it is clear that ASSK is the only opposition leader that Western countries would support (one reason is her fluent English!). Most Burmese dissidents are NLD supporters and if Burma would ever free itself from the iron grip of these Generals (and their Chinese masters), I am sure a lot of Burmese ex-pats (educated or not) will come home and help build the country. "Greed, Cunningness and Corruption" are foreign characteristics and I hope a future Burma will not be based on those principles anymore but on "the glory of the free human spirit".

Adam Selene Wrote:
11/07/2011
Tocharian wrote: "Adam Selene's English is flawed as well as his facile assessment of the NLD."

Well, I am not a native English speaker. So what's your point?

Do you really think ASSK used her influence to the fullest this last twenty years? She potentially has a big stick, but she never uses it. The NLD even watched from the sidelines during the 2007 protests.

I don't care that she is popular and that people invest their hopes in her. It's not a popularity contest and with the support from the people come responsibilities. I don't see a result. And every time I talk with NLD people I am appalled at the lack of substance, strategy and cunning.

But I guess you're happy the way things are going now, right?

Thin Thin Wrote:
09/07/2011
Adam Selene,

Haven't you seen the kind of support she gets from people when she visited Pagan? It's not that she doesn't have political abilities, but rather, lacks the cunning nature of Than Shwe and shamelessness of his cronies.

So, do not be so naive in your judgement.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
08/07/2011
I don't BUY that crap about Daw Suu is at the MERCY of the THUGS in UNIFORM to take her rightful PLACE and ROLE in Burma's politics and history.

In fact and conversely, they are at HER MERCY today lest they forget.

The POWER STRUGGLE ongoing at Naypyidaw today could certainly TURN THE TABLES on the lot at Naypyidaw as well.

And KIA, KNU and DKBA defying the BGF farce today could be the HARBINGER of BAD DAYS for the BAD GUYS led by Than Shwe/Thein Sein no less.

And Min Aung Naing could THROW IN his lot with Daw Suu in case he wants to REDEEM his PRIDE and PRIZE as a TRUE SON OF the BURMA ARMY founded by late Gen. Aung San.

tocharian Wrote:
08/07/2011
Adam Selene's English is flawed as well as his facile assessment of the NLD.

Adam Selene Wrote:
08/07/2011
Yes, it's time to get rid of "this evil system". But what if the generals really step aside? Anybody who knows the NLD from the inside knows will be appalled at the lack of substance. It's obvious also that ASSK, although very popular, has very little political abilities. She is a symbol, not a politician. Hence the lack of results up to today.

If she ever gets a position in government she will need people around her with policy making abilities and knowledge of governance, economics and finance.

Sadly at the senior level of the NLD these people are nowhere to be found.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.