Is Shwe Mann Trying to Steal Thein Sein's Reform Mantle?
covering burma and southeast asia
Saturday, April 27, 2024
Burma

NEWS ANALYSIS

Is Shwe Mann Trying to Steal Thein Sein's Reform Mantle?


By NYEIN NYEIN / THE IRRAWADDY Friday, March 16, 2012


Lower House Speaker Shwe Mann speaks during a meeting of the Burmese Parliament in Naypyidaw. (Photo: Irrawaddy)
COMMENTS (8)
RECOMMEND (252)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 2)

Now we see [the ex-army officials] are split among themselves.”

The same day that he blasted Thein Sein for dragging his feet on reforms, Shwe Mann departed for a four-day diplomatic visit to China—his third major overseas trip in his new capacity (he traveled to Russia last June and India at the end of last year) and a signal, perhaps, that he felt secure in his current position despite his repeated challenges to Thein Sein's authority.

After his return to Burma, the two leaders reportedly met privately to discuss the disagreement between them. Whatever the outcome of this meeting, however, the issue of the civil service pay rise remained on the agenda. In the first week of March, Minister of Industrial Development Maj-Gen Thein Htay said that Chinese-financed projects would not be cut back because they did not affect the national budget. He made these remarks in the context of calls by MPs to cut funding for large-scale projects so that the government could increase public sector salaries.

Beyond this signature issue, however, MPs say that Shwe Mann has also made his mark in other ways.

“To be honest, as a representative of an ethnic party, I expected him to be difficult to work with,” said  Sai Sao Si. “But after one year, we can clearly see that he is not only working in the interests of the USDP. He has shown goodwill toward all parties, and gets things done in a cool, rational manner.”

This attitude has won over most MPs, said Sai Sao Si, who claimed that most of his fellow legislators regard Shwe Man as an independent, reform-minded leader.

But while his stature within Parliament has steadily risen, some believe that Shwe Mann risks falling foul of the military, which remains the single most important force in Burmese politics. In an interview with Agence France Presse on Jan. 16, however, he said that he didn't think there was any danger of the armed forces taking control again.

“I don’t think it will happen in the future. We really understand the situation of the people and the country,” he said. “There is no other way than a democratic system.”

It seems, at any rate, that Shwe Mann has staked his own future on Burma's slow opening to the outside world. Indeed, his message of reform seems directed largely at an international audience. During his Feb. 22 press conference, for instance, he told reporters that the domestic media had been prevented from quoting his remarks in Parliament in full.

“I told [MPs] to have courage and speak out bravely, but in the news, the word ‘brave’ was removed,” he said, suggesting that Burma's highest authorities may be afraid of his calls for bold action.

But not everyone is convinced by Shwe Mann's efforts to portray himself as an outsider. Rather, he seems to be positioning himself for a prominent role in the new system, courting not only foreign governments and the international media, but also opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who he invited to visit Parliament on Monday.

Ultimately, say some observers, his pitch is directed at voters, who will go to the polls again in 2015. By that time, Thein Sein will be out of the picture and a new rivalry could emerge, pitting Shwe Mann the can-do “reformist” against Suu Kyi the charismatic standard-bearer of democracy.

Given the uphill struggle that awaits Suu Kyi when she enters Parliament and the political muscle that Shwe Mann has already acquired, it's anybody's guess who will prevail if their relationship develops into yet another struggle for control over the direction of Burmese reforms.



« previous  1  |  2  | 

COMMENTS (8)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Irrawaddy Fan Wrote:
25/03/2012
US House Speaker Boehner almost always disagree with President Obama so what's wrong with the disagreement between Shwe Mann and Thein Sein? They are just practicing Check-and-Balance a.k.a Democratic system. We should be happy because it's a sign that our country is becoming more of a democratic society where everyone including government officials can disagree publicly.

Hein Zaw Wrote:
23/03/2012
Can't you see Thein Sein & Shwe Mann are no rivals? It's just a make-belief role-play to fool the observers. No matter how you look at it, there has been no change whatsoever for the real people.

tocharian Wrote:
21/03/2012
Peking prefers Shwe Mann and "shitlone" THTRTAMO over Thein Sein and Suu Kyi. For the Chinese it all depends on who they can bribe and control!

Moe Aung Wrote:
20/03/2012
Let's hope these guys are for real but aren't they rather reminiscent of those Chinese legend heroes "su det su lu swan kaung"?

Enjoy the great show while we can, the more exciting infighting and all, and it is incumbent upon all of us to keep egging them on and pushing them toward democratic transformation even when they start screaming and hitting back.

Ohn Wrote:
18/03/2012
This was a great expansive imaginary first class story about non-existent absolute crap read like a seasoned "Political Observation".

What is needed of Shwe Mann is

1. to give back things stolen directly and indirectly - like forced selling of fertilizer by his son and relatives.

2. to stop the military clique's patron Chinese taking away more and more of the land and properties of the Burmese public unless they want a messy situation even with the Burmese military as usual siding with the Chinese against the people of Burma.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
17/03/2012
Shwe Mann and Thein Sein are BIRDS of the SAME FEATHER folks.
Their PRIMARY DUTY (obligation) IS TO SAFEGUARD their HEAD (Than Shwe) and HERD (families and cronies wealth) ONLY.
They will STALL and PLAY the GAME SAFE, whilst SELLING their SOULS and COUNTRY to the Chinese and Putin's Russia.
Daw Suu says she is going into Thein Sein's parliament to ESTABLISH RULE of LAW, AFFECT NATIONAL RECONCILIATION and AMEND Than Shwe drawn constitution as well.
Let's see WHAT HAPPENS after APRIL FOOLS' DAY ELECTION.
Anyway, SEIZING THE OPPORTUNITY and OPPORTUNE MOMENT as well via PEOPLE POWER only is the ANSWER FOR BURMA'S FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY and HUMAN RIGHTS lest Daw Suu, Min Ko Naing and his lot forget.

Oo Maung Gyi Wrote:
17/03/2012
In a unbalance country where is no system always prevail power struggle among the ruling class. As for Burma still no body knows where is its direction. Present parliament is not democratic elected and 25% is appoint with army unifrom to sit in parliament just see and study. It is an important factor so as to win the heart of army in an unchallange manner for Suu Kyi while she stay in side parliament after by election. President Thein Sein and Thura Shwe Mann are systemmatically struggling for
keeping power in hand solidly to control majority in the parliament in case of power crisis arise. Any way Burma has to go a bit long to establish full democracy for the interest of its peoples and the country.

Nat Ka Lay Wrote:
17/03/2012
Not increase salary but monthly allowance. What a different in terms of spending? What makes sense Finance Minister's argument? Taken this fact into account, the dispute-like saga is just a play that staged for show.

more articles in this section