Teenage Boys Tell of Forced Labor Horror
covering burma and southeast asia
Tuesday, August 04, 2020
Burma

Teenage Boys Tell of Forced Labor Horror


By SIMON ROUGHNEEN/ THE IRRAWADDY Friday, February 24, 2012


Four teenage boys who say they were forced to work as porters and human shields for the Burmese army. (Photo: Simon Roughneen)
COMMENTS (4)
RECOMMEND (290)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

LAIZA, Kachin State—The Burmese army is using underage boys for forced labour and is coercing porters to fight on the front line against the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), according to accounts given to The Irrawaddy by four teenagers who say they served as porters for the army.

Two of the four are under 18; the others 18 and 19. The elder two say they were forced to march in front of the infantry as the soldiers approached KIA positions. All four say they were coerced into joining the Tatmadaw (the common name for the Burmese army) after being promised jobs by army officers at different locations and at different times during 2011.

Burma's government forces have long been accused of forcing civilians to work as porters and for using child soldiers in its campaigns against ethnic militias in the country's borderlands. According to January 2012 figures, since 2007 there have been 1,160 forced labour complaints registered with the International Labour Organization, which recently agreed with the Burmese government to renew its complaints process for another year.

Fighting between the Tatmadaw and the KIA resumed on June 9, 2011, after a 17-year ceasefire. Since then around 70,000 people, mostly Kachin villagers, have fled their homes due to fighting.

Aung Nan, aged 14, is the youngest of the four. “I was forced to go with the army to Kachin State on Sept. 9,” he said. “They stopped me one night after I had been watching a movie with friends in my hometown in Mon State.”

He says that he—along with three others who were also under 18—was woken at 4 am every day and forced to carry around 15kg of rice for the soldiers, sometimes marching until midnight. Aung Nan said he was beaten several times for failing to keep up with the soldiers, but that he was not forced to fight.

“Whenever we neared a village, everyone had run away before we got there,” he said, adding that he did not see soldiers kill or injure civilians.

“I escaped and ran away on Dec. 1,” he said. “We were passing through a banana plantation at Shadanpa [15 miles south of Myitkyina], and I told the soldier guarding me that I needed to go to the toilet. I ran through the forest as soon as I had a chance.”

Sitting nearby, Soe Htaik and Min Tin, age 18 and 19 and from Pegu and Irrawaddy divisions respectively, said they became friends while portering for the Burmese army last year.

“We were taken to work for the soldiers at different times,” said Soe Htaik. “But we stuck together, and in the end, we made a plan to escape.” Min Tin nods. “I was arrested in May last year,” he said. “We escaped together on Dec. 24.”

Both said they were forced to march ahead of the soldiers on two separate occasions as the Tatmadaw approached KIA positions.

“I was scared,” said Min Tin, adding that they were given guns before advancing on the Kachin fighters. “They taught us how to use the guns.”

Both said they never saw soldiers carry out attacks on civilians.

The interviews were conducted at a KIA intelligence base outside Laiza, a predominantly Kachin town on the Burma-China border, and a stronghold of the KIA's political wing, the Kachin Independence Organisation (KIO).

The interview with Aung Nan was arranged first, with the three others volunteering to be interviewed when The Irrawaddy requested additional accounts from similar victims.

The four youngsters were picked up by the KIA after they escaped and were taken to Laiza. They each said they have been well treated at the spartan KIO/KIA compound, where they are free to walk around the compound and sit in shaded chairs outside their shared sleeping quarters.

“It is better than I expected,” said Soe Htaik. “We were afraid at first of what the KIA soldiers would do to us because we were on the other side.”

The KIO/KIA told The Irrawaddy that the four teenage detainees are free to leave, however they fear arrest if they try to return to their homes.

One, Aung Nan, wants to remain in Laiza. “There are not many jobs other than farming in Mon State,” he said. “I think I can find a better paying job here, if there is peace, and the Chinese businesspeople come back.

“I don't want to go back to school,” he added.

Win Myint, aged 17, said he was forcibly recruited by the Tatmadaw on Jan. 1, 2011. He doesn't remember exactly when he escaped, but said “I left because I did not want to be a soldier.”

He said he wants to go home, but is unsure if he can. Despite being under 18, he said he is afraid he will be arrested, his fears partly based on rumors he has heard that army deserters receive 25-year jail terms if caught.

“We saw some of our friends die,” said Soe Htaik.



1  |  2  next page »

COMMENTS (4)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

MattW Wrote:
05/03/2012
When travelling by taxi between Heho & Inle Lake last year, there was quite a bit of roadwork under way. It looked like rather tough work for anyone, let alone kids and ladies. I asked the driver what do they get paid? His English wasn't the best and he just pointed at some armed men in green standing around watching. Getting to my question - are those people doing the roadworks forced labour as well, and the armed men are stop them leaving? Or are the armed guys there for a different reason?

Rockderk Wrote:
01/03/2012
I've been reading and hearing reports of forced child labor and the use of human shields by SLORC and its various reincarnations for over a decade. That it's still happening is no surprise. Why should anyone expect the military forces in Myanmar to follow any conventional code of conduct? As long as the military holds the grand veto 'get out of jail free' card under the constitution they force fed the people, they can do as they please. And when you look at the models they have to emulate among their ASEAN colleagues or their masters in China...well, you can only really conclude that the elites in the military are well placed to control all prime land and business in a frenzy of corrupt deals going on even as I write this.

Ohn Wrote:
27/02/2012
This is neither new nor unexpected. Irrawaddy keeping a tab on important things taking time out from praising Thein Sein however is commendable.

The word "Tatmadaw" heavily promoted by the military in the last 20 years and is used by themselves and a lot of people some with reverence.

But it is like the word "Myanmar". An awkward word not used in daily speech among the Burmese populace who usually refer the military as "Sit-tut" and soldiers as "Sit-ther".

Burmese economy is in doldrums making people crave for foreign input of all sorts with unknown consequences. But the real problem is the immense effort to arm and kill each other taking away the land and labour from production.

But instead of stopping that and use time and labour efficiently, next plan seems to be to beg in more foreign money and directives increasing more coercions, more land confiscations and more killing.

The future is not so bright as people would be desperate to believe especially for the likes of the four boys.

Chella Wrote:
25/02/2012
SHAME ON BURMA!!! Criminal regime. Why does the UN stay silent on Burma? Incredible.

more articles in this section