The Assassin Who Couldn’t Kill
covering burma and southeast asia
Friday, April 26, 2024
Feature

FEATURE

The Assassin Who Couldn’t Kill


By KYAW ZWA MOE Friday, October 21, 2011


A young student intended to assassinate Khin Nyunt, who was then the head of Burma’s military intelligence service and the third-ranked general in the military junta.
COMMENTS (18)
RECOMMEND (430)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 3)

This began with the murder of Gen Aung San, the leader of Burma’s independence struggle, and his entire cabinet by the henchmen of rival politician U Saw on July 19, 1947, just six months before Burma gained its independence from Great Britain. Then after Gen Ne Win seized power in 1962, Sao Shwe Thaike, the first president of Burma following independence, was killed while being held in detention in an assassination believed to have been carried out by Ne Win’s soldiers.

Ne Win himself was the target of assassination plots and attempts. In 1976, Capt Ohn Kyaw Myint made an attempt to kill the ruthless dictator and other state leaders, but the young military officer was arrested before his plan was carried out and he was later hanged. Afterward, Ne Win became so paranoid that he wore a steel helmet during golf outings for fear of being assassinated, Singaporean leader Lee Kuan Ywe recalled in his book,“From Third World to First.”     

While there were several other assassination plots against Burma’s top military rulers between the time Ne Win took power in 1962 and resigned in 1988, most failed. The highest ranking military officer who was killed during that period was Brig-Gen L-Khun Hpang, an ethnic Kachin and the powerful commander of the Northern Command, who was assassinated in 1985 by the Kachin Independence Army, an ethnic armed group.

Attempts to assassinate the leaders of groups opposing the government were more successful during Ne Win’s reign and beyond. In 1950, Saw Ba U Gyi, the father of the Karen resistance movement and the former minister of revenue under British rule, was killed by government troops in an ambush. In 1968, Thakin Than Tun, a prominent communist leader, was also killed by a government agent in the Pegu Yoma range, where the Communist Party of Burma was based. More recently, in 2008 a leader of the Karen National Union, Mahn Sha, was killed in an operation reportedly led by a KNU splinter group, which is an ally of the government.

Wunna was released from prison in 2008 after spending 19 years behind bars. Now in his mid-40s, he still believes that assassination is a just way to avoid wars and to end people’s suffering, and that a successful assassination of Khin Nyunt would have benefited Burma despite the fact that the MI chief was purged in 2004 on charges of corruption and has been under house arrest ever since.

“Khin Nyunt was the key junta leader at that time. If he had disappeared from the military regime, there was no other general who was cunning and clever enough to continue to rule the country,” said Wunna, adding that the vacuum caused by Khin Nyunt’s disappearance from the junta would have lead to a better political landscape for the opposition groups to negotiate with the weakened regime.  
 
At the time that Wunna embarked on his assassination attempt, Khin Nyunt was secretary 1 of the junta. He was also close to former dictator Ne Win, who still controlled the regime during the early 1990s despite having retired in 1988. Wunna and his colleagues believed that if Khin Nyunt was removed, then Snr-Gen Saw Maung, who had vowed to hand over power after the May 1990 election, would keep his promise.

With Khin Nyunt still in place, however, after Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy won the 1990 election by a landslide, the junta did not keep Saw Maung’s promise, and Saw Maung was removed from his position in 1992 and replaced by Than Shwe, who went on to rule the country with an iron fist for almost two decades. When asked to give his perspective on the non-violent approach practiced by Aung San Suu Kyi during that 20-year period, Wunna said he respected Suu Kyi but didn’t think her method was effective.

“Look, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi herself was almost killed at least twice by the military regime’s thugs—in Rangoon in 1996 and in Depayin in 2003,” Wunna said. 

“Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and her followers have used that non-violent method for the past 20 years, but there are more than 1,000 political prisoners still incarcerated today and except for a handful of the military and government leaders and their cronies, most of Burma’s 50 million people still suffer hardships,” Wunna added. “So if the source of those hardships and problems is gone, the people’s lives will be better off.” 

While admitting that attempts to kill beloved and respected leaders such as Aung San and Mahn Sha have been more successful than plots against the lives of ruthless leaders like Ne Win and Khin Nyunt, Wunna still believes that assassination is the most effective tactic in a war against a dictatorial regime.



« previous  1  |  2  |  3  next page »

COMMENTS (18)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
28/10/2011
"..to stand at the court of law." ? WHAT COURT OF LAW? I HAVE SEEN THE WHOLE DOCUMENTARY. I know the whole truth.

In any case, who would haul any Englishman BEFORE court FOR KILLING AungSan? Don't be naive.

Don't make a quick check. Make a very thorough check and infer!

Does anyone really think Prince Kanaung was assassinated by Burmese? Think again.
Burmese killed Burmese. It does not preclude English killing AungSan. Get the logic?

"BTW, the older the wine is the better and the more expensive."???? Have you been drinking wine?

Mogyothwar Wrote:
27/10/2011
Myanmar Patriots,

When I make a quick check the so called "new evidence" suggesting British involvement are not the proofs to stand at the court of law.

We know and we are seeing with our own eyes nations leaders were killed. for one reason or the other. We also know who are behind these killings. But no proofs beyond reasonable doubts to stand the trial, or tom have justifies conviction.

BTW, the older the wine is the better and the more expensive.

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
27/10/2011
mogyothwar Wrote:

"Further investigation is also needed on "who killed Aung San"" WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?

Check out "Fergal Keane examines new evidence suggesting British involvement in the killing of Burmese nationalist leader Aung San in 1947."

Shame Wrote:
27/10/2011
If he has no guts to carry his assassination attempt, why continue bragging that best way is to wipe the military thugs. He's a real coward with big mouth. Chicken !

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
26/10/2011
Democracy?

We are getting there. Ashin Than-Shwe has provided the bottle that never existed before. We get there without assassinations or collateral damage - thousands dying from bombing.

Be forgiving to yourself. Regardless of our failings in many respects, we, Myanmars, have brought about the change peacefully, by ourselves, free from outsiders' interference. We are no Arabs. We are Buddhists!

New wine is filling the bottle. Just keep adding new wine!

SuSu Wrote:
26/10/2011
>> Nyi Nyi said, "It is never good to see any kind of assassination to anyone. We don't want to see this happening in Burmese politics."<<

Sadly, we did have such cowardly assassinations in Burmese politics since the eve of the country's Independence. That is the very reason why, our country is in such a mess. Good guys are reluctant to perform such "dirty, cowardly acts," but the Bad guys have no moral values and readily commit these CRIMES. What lersay said was right, "With Brutal leaders, if you do not catch them, they are always there to catch you without mercy and consideration."

mogyothwar Wrote:
26/10/2011
Sell that story to 'Hollywood'.

Actor Bruce Willis, Angelina Jolie may be interested.

Anyway, this news is the proof of the intention of ABSDF or KNU. We need further more proofs of who are behind ABSDF and Kayins.

Further investigation is also needed on "who killed Aung San"

Leaders of nations who disagree with West were and are being assassinated or lynch by so called their own people.

Nyi Nyi Wrote:
25/10/2011
It's good he did not carry out the assassination. It is never good to see any kind of assassination to anyone. We don't want to see this happening in Burmese politics.

KML Wrote:
24/10/2011
I would like to rephrase those two statements….

“there was no other general who was cunning and clever enough to continue to rule the country”

“there was no other general who was cunning and stupid enough to continue to rule the country”

“Khin Nyunt’s disappearance from the junta would have lead to a better political landscape for the opposition groups to negotiate with the weakened regime”

“with the optimistic and realistic senior military officers in the regime”

lersay Wrote:
24/10/2011
With Brutal leaders, if you do not catch them, they are always there to catch you without mercy and consideration.

Kyaw Wrote:
23/10/2011
These guys poorly trained and not a combatant types at all. The present Government Military Operation and use of the heavy weapons in the Kachin will create effective terrorism very soon. The Kachins have already used the suicide attackers to destroy the 120 mm guns.

Moe Aung Wrote:
23/10/2011
Generally speaking assassinations carried out by the ruling class tend to achieve a near 100% success for obvious reasons compared with the attempts made by student radicals and revolutionaries. Capt. Ohn Kyaw Myint had a real chance but blew it by involving too many co-conspirators.

Whilst leaders do play a crucial role in both opposition political movements and govts, their elimination does not necessarily result in a collapse of the party or a govt, only a temporary setback which has a greater impact in the case of a popular movement. Hence ruling classes may use assassination as a last resort indicative of ideological bankruptcy and desperation on their part.

Frustration and desperation also drive the 'terrorist assassin' but a successful attempt tends to have little or no impact on entrenched power.

Popular struggle must rely on a mass organization, mass action, a general strike and ultimately a well prepared popular uprising where peaceful methods fail.

UNITE and PREPARE!

Mya Kyar Phyu Wrote:
23/10/2011
“I don’t care if killing is a sin or is unlawful if it brings good to my country,” he said. “But I just couldn’t do it.” <<< A true ( almost pathological level of weak-minded) nature of a Burmese including me if I've ever been out in the same situation like him. If Gadhafi had been born in Burma, he would have been much more luckier!

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
22/10/2011
Very interesting.

Billy Mackenzie Wrote:
22/10/2011
The title of this article would be more appropriate with THE ASSASSIN WHO DARE NOT KILL, rather than who can't.. He could if he had the guts.

Awng Wrote:
22/10/2011
What evidence do you have to write like this?
KIA doesn't have such history. According to the eye witness, no wonder, it was Burmese Military Government troops.

"While there were several other assassination plots against Burma’s top military rulers between the time Ne Win took power in 1962 and resigned in 1988, most failed. The highest ranking military officer who was killed during that period was Brig-Gen L-Khun Hpang, an ethnic Kachin and the powerful commander of the Northern Command, who was assassinated in 1985 by the Kachin Independence Army, an ethnic armed group."

Min Nway Wrote:
22/10/2011
It is obviously proved that Non Violent means to get True Democracy was not helpful in the past.

We have seen recently, Gaddafi
did not change his attitude until he was killed.

Non-violent means prolonged our suffering.
Decades have changed and it is unwise if we
still apply old method nowadays to achieve
True Democracy.

Maung Maung Wrote:
22/10/2011
Assassination of political or military leaders will not solve any problem, but will compound it as was shown by the outbreak of the world war I and continuation of the KNU underground after Saw Ba U Gyi's death and the similar continuity of the CPB after the death of its chairman Thakhin Than Tun. I'm not sure assassination of General Khin Nyunt in the 1990 would have made much difference to the SLORC or SPDC by looking at the more oppressive nature of the SPDC after Khin Nyunt's dismissal. I'm all for non-violent ways for change in Burma.

more articles in this section