Killing the Irrawaddy
covering burma and southeast asia
Sunday, January 11, 2026
Burma

NEWS ANALYSIS

Killing the Irrawaddy


By AUNG DIN Thursday, August 4, 2011


The Irrawaddy River is the past, present and future of Burma and major bloodline of the country. (Photo: www.galenfrysinger.com)
COMMENTS (12)
RECOMMEND (382)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 3 of 4)

But the price the whole country has to pay back for Chinese protection of the military regime is enormous.

There have been many countries rushing to Burma to exploit its vast natural resources ever since the military regime opened its doors to a market economy. The reality, however, is that it is not real capitalism, but crony-capitalism. China is the most aggressive investor among them, and is sucking the country’s blood everywhere it can set foot. Centuries-old evergreen forests in Kachin and Shan States were rooted out by Chinese logging companies. Many mountains are being destroyed by Chinese mine companies to search for gold, copper, sapphire and jade. Tens of thousands of people have been displaced and hundreds of villages have been destroyed along the route of construction of two pipelines that transport natural gas and oil to China from Burma’s Rakhine (Arakan) State. Some major cities of Burma are now becoming like Chinese cities, as Chinese populations and their properties grow and expand dramatically. Actually, China has colonized Burma without shooting a gun and has sucked the life of the people of Burma with the help of the Burmese regime and its cronies. Now, they are killing the Irrawaddy River as well.

Tens of thousands of Chinese workers have been in Kachin State, using heavy machinery and building infrastructures for the Myitsone Dam project. Forests are being cut down. Valleys and plains are being dug up. Nearly 20,000 ethnic people are being forced to relocate. The Myitsone confluence will be destroyed and most of the major cities in Kachin State will be flooded and submerged when the dams are completed. But the harsh repercussions will be felt not just in Kachin state, but also downstream, as 60 percent of the people of Burma rely on the Irrawaddy’s watershed.

After completion of the dam, the water flow from the N’Mai and Mali Rivers will be stopped by the dam and saved in the reservoir to generate electricity. The N’Mai and Mali Rivers will not be the origin of the Irrawaddy anymore, but rather the dam will be. The amount of water to be kept at all the times in the reservoir will drastically decrease the amount of water the Irrawaddy receives, and the flow of water in the river will be much weaker. It will create huge damage for the people living along the river, beginning with ships and vessels unable to sail in the shallow waters; fishermen unable to catch fish which can’t survive in the polluted waters; farmers unable to grow rice and vegetables due to frequent draughts and lack of sufficient and steady water supplies; the spread and epidemic of infectious diseases from using and drinking contaminated water and lack of clean water; permanent losses of vulnerable and endangered species of birds, flowers, plants and fresh water animals; significant changes of ecosystem and climate; destruction of mangroves; in addition to other extensive damages. During the dry season, which lasts four months from February to May, due to the low volume of water coming from the upstream of the river, sea water from the Andaman Sea will flow back to the Delta region with high tidal water volume, and Burma’s major rice production area will be flooded with salt-water. The Irrawaddy River may disappear in ten years, like the Yellow River in China.

This will be a major catastrophe for the people of Burma in terms of food security, health, society, the economy, poverty levels and politics.

The Burmese regime will receive about $500 million per year, 20 percent of the total revenue, when the project begins to generate and transport electricity to China. But this will amount to a tiny fraction of the losses the people of Burma will have to bear for generations.

The Chinese government has been aiding the Burmese regime in its crimes against humanity for many years. For decades, Burma’s military regime has been carrying out scorched-earth campaigns against its own civilian population, destroying over 3,700 ethnic villages, using rape as a weapon of war, enslaving hundreds of thousands of Burmese people as forced laborers, recruiting tens of thousands of child soldiers into its army, killing innocent civilians, and forcing over 2 million people to flee their homes as refugees and internally displaced persons. Such flagrant crimes are not simply human rights abuses—they are mass atrocities, amounting to crimes against humanity and war crimes. Compounding the brutality and magnitude of such international crimes is the system of impunity, which protects perpetrators and punishes victims.

Now, the Chinese government has crossed the line, stepped up further to commit its own human rights abuses in Burma by attempting to kill the Irrawaddy. Killing the Irrawaddy is destroying the lives of the people of Burma—both in the present and in the future—physically and mentally.

The Irrawaddy River is the past, present and future of Burma and major bloodline of the country.



« previous  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  next page »

COMMENTS (12)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Phillip Kyin Wrote:
12/08/2011
It seems that the author is blaming the Chinese more. Every country is trying to survive. At least give the Chinese credit for trying to make a name for themselves in the would. I cannot say the same about the regime. All the points that the author made are well taken. Will he feel better if the natives are working on the projects instead of the Chinese? Will the fossil power plants solve the environmental problems? By the end of the article I thought I was reading a press release from a regime, very bias. Those were the articles that I used to read back in Burma.

Zaw Zaw Wrote:
11/08/2011
Aung Din has made very good points and grave concerns of dam constructions on the Irrawaddy river and it's potential disastrous impact on the livelihoods of the Burma. As we all know, how greatly important for the future survival and prosperity of the people of Burma, we as the citizens of Burma must make sure whatever we can in order to save the Irrawaddy river ( Mother of Burma ).

Oo Maung gyi Wrote:
08/08/2011
Why Burmese peoples are coward? Why not kill those are involved killing Irrawaddy. Destroy all properties and wealth of those parties involved.

Maung Maung Wrote:
07/08/2011
Who is killing the River Irrawaddy?
(1) SPDC
(2) Chinese
(3) Burmese tycoons
Thank you U Aung Din

BotherNumberOne Wrote:
06/08/2011
Just FYI: China (and India, yet another big player on the no-ethics-whatsoever-market!) does the same in several parts of ... Africa.

Khin Lin Wrote:
06/08/2011
Thanks you Ko Aung Din. Burmese history is very rough, now even reached to destroy the physical geography. Rudeness thought of Chinese is out of words, so did Burmese government. People who only watch the pocket is reaching in main sources of the country. We all civilians need to stand together on this affair.many people in Burma are toxic by Chinese and their own government. Burma, Irrawaddy, Thanlwin, Chindwin, and all parts of Burma are own by all citizens, and we all need to protect our land together.

TAH Wrote:
05/08/2011
I think Chinese authority and its companies have already filled some of regime's most influential people's coffers with green bucks. Now that civilian regime is desperately speeding up to strike a peace deal with KIO speak its volume in this killer project. I see the day people of Burma will violently occupy these infrastructures, may be next ten years later when they get full citizenship rights of freedom of expression, assembly and choosing their leaders.

Zaw Min Wrote:
05/08/2011
Irrawaddy is the heart of this land that can be called whatever by whoever living there. This land and this river is not for Bama nor the Kachins but by all who live on it. They can be Bama, Kachin and any other ethnic minorities like Shan, Karens etc. as well as Indians, Chinese, Laotians and Thais. The only condition is that all must live together in peace in lawful way with understanding and willingness to stand up against anyone who is out to destroy it. Why can't we do this together? It can be a great oasis in this world and it must not be turned into a ruined land where no one can live.

Prozac Wrote:
05/08/2011
All People in Burma and outside Burma must stand up to fight the junta against the murders of the Irrawaddy AND the Salween Rivers before it is too late!

tocharian Wrote:
05/08/2011
Excellent article, Ko Aung Din!

It should be clear now for everyone living in Burma that China is public enemy number one. It's time to set aside, at least temporarily, local conflicts inside Burma to take a united stand against the robbing, ripping and raping of the natural environment and the social fabric of Burma by the selfish and greedy Chinese. I have warned about these sinister Chinese plans for dams, pipelines and naval bases for quite a while. The writing is clearly on the wall now! The local internal conflicts (both political and ethnic) can be resolved (later) once this huge external threat to the country is removed. In fact, Chinese commercial influence and political control are the main reasons why Burma got stuck in such dire straits. Damn the dams!

Myint Thein, Dallas Wrote:
05/08/2011
Excellent "Yellow Peril" analysis of the Myitsone Dam.

Freedom and Democracy in Indonesia was precipitated by anti-Chinese riots. Burma will follow the same Road-Map.

Brang Wrote:
05/08/2011
Dear Irrawaddy,

Please disable your autoplay adverts. It really annoyed readers who want to read the article.

more articles in this section