Port Project Raises Concerns about Rights, Environment
covering burma and southeast asia
Monday, April 29, 2024
Burma

Port Project Raises Concerns about Rights, Environment


By YENI Wednesday, January 12, 2011


Burmese farmers near Tavoy are worried about where they will be relocated to and how they will be compensated for the loss of their land. (Photo: http://www.burma-all.com)
COMMENTS (2)
RECOMMEND (631)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 3 of 3)

Fueling their concerns is the fact that no environmental impact assessment has been carried out and that the project does not include any environmental conservation plan.
 
“The construction of a deep-sea port and industrial zone on the Tenasserim coast will severely affect the biodiversity along the coastal region,” said a Burmese marine biologist from the Marine Science Association of Myanmar, speaking on condition of anonymity.
 
Another scientist who has studied the the region's unique, life-supporting ecosystems echoed these concerns: “Mangrove forest and coral reef are very important places for a wide range for aquatic species. They are necessary environments for the life and reproduction of those species. Without them, aquatic animals can no longer exist. As a result, biodiversity will be ruined.”

Especially sensitive, he said, are the 601 species of coral reefs that have reportedly been found in the Mergui archipelago, which comprises over 800 islands.
 
Referring to the lack of strong regulations and good governance to protect the environment, an official from the Forest Resource Environment Development and Conservation Association (FREDA), a leading Burmese environmental NGO based in Rangoon, also warned of long-term costs.

“Fuel wastes from ships and petrochemical waste from the factories will become an environmental problem that is quite difficult to tackle,” the official said.
 
None of this is likely to stop the Tavoy project from going ahead, however. As Matthew Smith, a senior consultant at EarthRights International (ERI), an international environmental and human rights group, has noted, “The well-being of the population and the environment simply haven't been prioritized under military rule, especially when business interests come into play.” 

This was amply illustrated recently when a court in Kachin state awarded villagers evicted from the Hugawng Valley Tiger Reserve just 80,000 kyat ($96) per acre for land confiscated by the Yuzana Company, which in 2006 was granted 200,000 acres in the reserve to establish sugarcane and tapioca plantations. This was the same amount that was originally offered to them by Yuzana, which is owned by Htay Myint, who is on the US sanctions blacklist and soon to become a sitting member of Burma's Parliament after winning a seat in Tenasserim Division as a candidate for the regime-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party.

Many observers believe, however, that it is precisely this disregard for environmental and human rights protections that makes the Tavoy project so appealing to Thai investors. They note that the shift to Burma comes as Thailand imposes stricter environmental regulations in the wake of findings that residents of Map Ta Phut in Rayong Province had an increased risk of cancer due to air and groundwater pollution from the country's largest industrial port. 
 
However, shifting to Burma carries its own dangers, say activists.

“Investors face serious material and reputational risks, despite the regime's propaganda, and what Asian companies investing in these projects aren't thinking about is the possibility of serious liabilities in courts of law for complicity in abuses in Burma,” said ERI's Matthew Smith.

Ba Thant in Tavoy and Aung Thet Wine in Rangoon contributed to this report.



« previous  1  |  2  |  3  | 

COMMENTS (2)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Kanye West Wrote:
13/01/2011
How much has Afghanistan cost the Europe & USA? What has been the benefits? What is the Environmental impact? Ask the same questions about Iraq!

Did either of these nations have just and fair elections?

Maybe the US, Europe, Australia & NZ could compete with Thailand and China in Myanmar offering better rights, conditions and hopefully less environmental impact.

Currently this hood of Capitalist international Conglomerate of Nations offer nothing more than further years of punitive sanctions; in the hope of what? They are only going to make themselves more insignificant.

The sanctions never hurt the rich, the sanctions only entrenched them whilst the poor were forced into the gutter. Denied access to international markets to sell their goods and the funds to buy labor saving machinery to ease the manual laborers burden.

Than Shwe now likely has no interest in having the sanctions lifted. Myanmar has learned to do without the west; the question now is who needs whom more?

U Tin Myint Wrote:
13/01/2011
Thailand has been using cheap Burmese labor for over a decade. In Thailand they have fully exploited the Burmese economic refugees giving them only token rights in 2008. At least by working for Thai businesses in Myanmar the Burmese can expect more rights. They will be able to settle down, purchase property, send their children to school and plan for the future.

Aung San Suu Kyi could not have prevented the Western sanctions against Myanmar. They were intended to prevent Myanmar developing and nothing to do with democracy. She choose to support the sanctions to appear as having influence and Great Britain and the USA played along. Now that China, India and Thailand have started to invest 10's of billions of dollars, the game has changed. Business in Myanmar is no longer about a couple of million $ worth of lentils and some prawns & fish.

How are Europe and USA going to support Aung San Suu Kyi? They need to have a very significant investment package worth $500 billion to give voice!

more articles in this section