Article 417 and Men Who Cheat
covering burma and southeast asia
Wednesday, May 08, 2024
Burma

Article 417 and Men Who Cheat


By KYI WAI Friday, September 3, 2010


In this 2009 photo, Burmese women light candles during a light festival at the famed Shwedagon Pagoda in Rangoon. (Photo: AP)
COMMENTS (16)
RECOMMEND (290)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

RANGOON — Burmese society was fascinated recently by a potential court case involving an academy award winning actress and her live-in partner, when the actress tried to sue the man under Article 417 of the penal code.

Pan Phyu and her Article 417  lawsuit against her partner Zaw Win Shein, the managing director of the Ayar-Hintha Company, highlighted the plight of many women who live with a man who promises marriage but later moves on, leaving the women abandoned.

“We were living together because we planned to marry,” the actress told The Irrawaddy. “But, he broke his promise for our marriage and also treated me very badly. That's why I have sued him.”

However, Pan Phyu said her case has been rejected by courts at the township and at the district level.

Yin Yin Hlaing, a female member of the judiciary system, said she feels sorry whenever she sees women in court suing men for deceiving them under Article 417. She said she supported Pan Phyu's action.

“I feel uncomfortable when I see women enduring the pain of testifying before the court with shame and bitter feelings,” she said. “I don't understand why the women were so eager to  believe in someone,” said Yin Yin Hlaing, 40, who has worked in the courts for 18 years.

“I am not sure whether love is blind or not, but many women who file lawsuits against their partners are poor,” she said.  “They couldn't even hire lawyers.”

“Women need to be brave enough and broadminded to fight against injustice and face the truth. I am in  favor of taking action against men who cheated women. And, I don't support women who become silent although they are bullied and cheated because they fear that it will be doubled their shame once their case is heard in court,” said Yin Yin Hlaing.

She said many men take advantage of women being shy and afraid to go to court to testify.

Kyi Htun, a women living in Rangoon, shared a similar case. She told The Irrawaddy that her lawsuit against her partner under  Article 417 was rejected by Rangoon's eastern district court.

“Money decides the winner,” she said.  “I was living together with him because he said he would marry me.” She said her partner bribed the judge to win the case.

According to the penal code, if a man is convicted under Article 417 he can be sentenced to one year imprisonment or be fined.

An woman official at the Rangoon Division Working Committee for Women's Affairs said there are many women who still don't know or understand that they can file a lawsuit against men who cheat them.

She said, “The don't know how to file their complaints. They can't afford it financially and it will affect their survival once they are in court. That's why many of them sit still after being cheated.”

She said the Working Committee has helped women with social problems, including seeking compensation for them so that they don't need to go to court.

“The worse thing is that once something like this happens, only women will be blamed in the Burmese community,” she said. “Also, women are more or less afraid of being in court with others' present. So, I think it will take time for Burmese women to even speak out about such wrong doing,” said the official.

A female lecturer at Dagon University in northern Rangoon said the root cause of the problem is the acceptance of living together without marriage.

“Economic hardship is the underlying cause of many problems,” she said. “When young people want to get married, they can't do so because of their economic situation. So, they chose to live together without marriage. Later, such cheating cases happen,” she said.

She said that since marriage is not easy anymore in Burmese society, many middle age couples have chosen to live together. In any case, men should marry the woman they live with, she said.

Ni Ni Thein, a female high court lawyer, said many young girls are deceived and sexually abused because they are poor and lack education and experience.

“They don't have a secure environment, so once they become an adult they look for someone who they think they can trust and live with. Men take advantage of their situation,” said Ni Ni Thein.

COMMENTS (16)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Moe Aung Wrote:
10/09/2010
Free Man

Our society makes fun of almost everything out of the ordinary but that's the extent of it. They are not persecuted and beaten up like elsewhere in the world. They are not regarded as a menace, not yet anyway.

Ko Gyi Kyaw is one of the more famous nats called U Min Kyaw who is partial to drink and cockfighting. You'll see in the wiki article below a picture of a gay natkadaw dressed up as Ko Gyi Kyaw.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nat_%28spirit%29

Like it or lump it, it's an integral part of Burmese culture that goes back to pre-Buddhist times.

Free Man Wrote:
09/09/2010
MA!
I don't think our society tolerates gay men and lesbians. For instance, they call gay men A'khyauk, Gundoo, etc. and mock them. We can know how they feel, due to this kind of derogatory and derisive remarks, by putting ourselves in their shoes.

I didn't know that there are gay natkadaw, and I have seen only female natkadaw. Anyway, good to know. By the way, what is Ko Gyi Kyaw? Are they also a kind of natkadaw?

Moe Aung Wrote:
09/09/2010
Free Man

If you look at the 'Traditional Burmese Buddhist Marriage Law' referred to by Dr Maung Maung Gyi below, you will realize that there is no such thing as 'living in sin' in Burmese society. It can only apply to adultery, and the Burmese term for the new lover is simply 'lesser wife/husband'.

The other time honored expression is 'if the man's paso (sarong) is on the rail, they are husband and wife'.

So neither living together nor homosexuality that Bryan the Burmese mentioned pose a challenge to the religion and moral values of Burmese society. Just don't try and convince the Burmese that homosexuality is normal.

Gay men and lesbians do not need to come out since they are as a rule easily recognizable unlike in the West. They are well tolerated, and may flaunt themselves at Nat spirit festivals or shows. Indeed the tradition of gay men fulfilling the role of spirit mediums called 'natkadaw' (nat's consort) is well established.

Bryan the Burmese Wrote:
08/09/2010
In next few years, homosexuality (Gays & Lesbians) will challenge the moral value of Burmese society after this "Living together' or "Live-In together" phenomenon. I am not for or against homosexuality, it is just my prediction.

Free Man Wrote:
07/09/2010
@Nan Tal

I wonder how you have come to the conclusion that being in a de facto relationship is "a kind of moral corruption". Is that because the Buddhist teaching says so? If so, why?

Nan Tal Wrote:
06/09/2010
I don't really think we just can say “Economic hardship is the underlying cause of many problems,” but I would rather say that it is a kind of moral corruption—sex without marriage, living together without officially marriage against the buddhist teaching.

Soe Wrote:
04/09/2010
I agree with Dr. Maung Maung's comment, the
lawyer should filed the case under Burmese
customary law if this law is still active since so much law and rules are changing so much now a day...

Moe Aung Wrote:
04/09/2010
It's not peculiar to Burmese society although it becomes newsworthy because the phenomenon of living together('living in sin' in the old Western parlance) is new here.

As in all societies, it is arguably a case of women selling themselves short on a promise. They used to have 'breach of promise' cases in the West until the earlier part of the 20th C.

It certainly is economics underlying the phenomenon, as marriage has become unaffordable to young people when many of them still live with their parents. But once a couple can set up a home together, hardly a problem in this particular case, it's down to the woman to assert her rights unless it's her choice to carry on unwed.

The expression - if you are getting the milk free, why buy the cow - strikes a chord with the majority of men. By the same token, caveat emptor (buyer beware) should make sense to the majority of women. Prevention is better than cure. It gets messy and acrimonious as passion flips from love to hate. The lawyers win.

James Wrote:
04/09/2010
It seems as Burmese society rushes to adapt this “modern” life style without preparing for consequences. But, changes are not always easy. Even in modern society had to face many social problems when they start practicing this live-in style. Live-in together without marriage may cause so many damages socially, economically, psychologically, culturally, religiously, politically and etc. This causes the commitment problem and unstable lifestyle. In the modern society, people might be living decently and possess materials but most of them are hollow inside. It is a fact. Depression is one of the lead problems in our modern society. Loneliness and lack of family value cause these problems among other problems such as financial and etc. This is something we should think about and “Live-In together” is a social problem that people do not want to touch because we are kind of enjoying it, too. I have 3 words for everybody-commitment, commitment & commitment, Ladies & Gents.

Bryan the Burmese Wrote:
04/09/2010
My hypothesis to this “new-life style” per-se in Burmese society in Burma is that we tend to copy this so called “Modern” life style without thinking and preparing ourselves mentally and socially. In the US and most “modern” societies, neither women nor men could care less “if he or she left me” or “If things don’t work out” and for some don’t expect to get married at all. Some do get married finally and some just walk on their own way with some degree of emotional damage but they can move on. Some meet the right person eventually.

In Burma, I think women expect and trust too much without preparing some negative consequences. This applies to men as well. Society, especially women, is not ready to accept as any other normal person the departure of a partner from a live-in together situation; being open-minded plays major role but we have to think what is right and wrong before jumping on bandwagon.

Free Man Wrote:
04/09/2010
*In a country, if lovers who have been in a de facto relatioship for 3 years break up, the law requires that their wealth is divided equally among them. I don't know how the current Burmese laws work.
*I wouldn't call this whole thing cheating. People change. A person may love one person today, and another the next day. Or he/she may love them both, or more than two at the same time. Both man and woman have the right to break up with their partners, if they don't want to be in the present relationship anymore.
*A marriage certificate won't make someone love and/or want to live with you, if he/she doesn't love and want to live with you. A marriage certificate doesn't determine the level of our partners' commitment to our relationships either. Who wants to be in a paper-based relationship/marriage where there is no love, commitment,caring,etc.? So, it would be better to forget this piece of paper.
*All we have to do is to liberate our mind and change our way of thinking.

Kayla Wrote:
04/09/2010
I don't see what women in uniform lighting candles at the pagoda image has to do with this article about men cheating. Why not display a picture of Pan Phyu or a court scenario?

Natshinnaung Wrote:
03/09/2010
Pan Phyu,
If you are a cheap woman, you will be treated by men this way in the future too. Without a written agreement you will always lose. Buddhist law may not work under the military, who do not care even for the lives of holy monks. Women who sleep around make themselves cheap women.

Violet Wrote:
03/09/2010
Re: Dr Maung Maung Gyi comment

I really appreciate his comment. It's very valuable for both lawyers and Myanmar women to broaden their knowledge.

Myanmar Lawers should fully understand all laws related to protection of Myanmar women in particular as they have to consult those who face such situations.

Myanmar women are very vulnerable to be cheated and most Burmese men want to take advantage. Myanmar society only blames women, not men. This is completely unacceptable. The community should totally support women who are innocent and help them avoid such men.

Let's hope more strict laws fully favored to protect Myanmar women rights will emerge and Judges can be free from prejudice in near future.


Dr. Maung Maung Gyi Wrote:
03/09/2010
In this kind of case, I would like to suggest Burmese women and their lawyers should apply "Traditional Burmese Buddhist Marriage Law" (Buddha Bathar Einhtaung Hmukhan Dhammathaat) instead of section 417.

Traditional Burmese Buddhist Marriage Law states: "If a man and a woman live together, eat togther and sleep together and seven neighbours or 7 persons can attest for this, the couple becomes Husband and wife automatically. Then the husband is obligated to pay alimony to the wife!

Hence, Pan Phyu and her ex-boyfriend were already married according to this law and her case should be considered as a divorce. Therefore, he is obliged to pay her alimony!

timothy Wrote:
03/09/2010
It is world wide problem of break down of family units, marital disruption and communal break-down. In Burmese custom, when a woman is divorced, she is somehow socially outcast. Living together used to be unthinkable and unacceptable as acustom. Now the economic mismanagement and political raping of the country by the army brought those unacceptable customs right into the society. For survival, poor young girls had to use their bodies as slaves of the rich men. Previously unthinkable, living together as a couple is a sort of modern fashion. But when the false custom breaks down, the same old customary punishment of being an outcast is put unfairly on women. It is the unfair socio-economic condition pounding more salt into the wounded disgruntled women in addition to the presence of traditional unfavourable customs for women. The lack of women's rights assaults the women further. Until we get the democracy in the country---

more articles in this section