India-Burma Relations Hitting a Dead End?
covering burma and southeast asia
Saturday, January 10, 2026
Opinion
CONTRIBUTOR

India-Burma Relations Hitting a Dead End?


By CAMILL BUZZI and ÅSHILD KOLÅS Thursday, March 11, 2010


COMMENTS (3)
RECOMMEND (172)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 2)

They have also pitted the Indian government against sections of its own population who favor support for democracy in Burma.

India’s interests would be better served by joining the ranks of the international community seeking to encourage political reforms and respect for human rights in Burma rather than continuing down the current path. Most importantly, India should immediately suspend military assistance to Burma and instead join global efforts to seek an arms embargo on Burma. 

Furthermore, India should press for conditions that will allow free and fair elections in Burma, including for representatives of the country’s ethnic minorities. The Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand have all spoken out in recent weeks on the need for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners in Burma. India also needs to state its position publicly.

Finally, India should end its current silence on gross rights abuses taking place in Burma, and support international attempts to seek an independent commission of inquiry into the most severe violations of human rights and humanitarian law in Burma.

Such a reorientation in India’s Burma policy needs to be accompanied by a similar shift in Delhi’s policy towards the northeastern states. Indeed, Delhi would be better served by allowing a greater international humanitarian presence, especially by UN agencies, in the Northeast, and by joining regional initiatives to combat non-traditional security threats.

Without a significant shift in India’s Burma policy, India-Burma relations could soon be hitting a dead end. What is India waiting for?

Camilla Buzzi is a Ph.D candidate at the Centre for Human Rights Studies and Social Development, Mahidol University, Thailand. Åshild Kolås is a researcher at the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), Norway, and leader of PRIO’s Conflict Resolution and Peace-building program.



« previous  1  |  2  | 

COMMENTS (3)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Kyaw Wrote:
15/03/2010
The writers are quite ignorant,destructive and pretentiously uneducated in their article.
India contributed, forced by England, armies to the illegal British invasion/colonization of Burma's Konbaun Dynasty and noble governance.
Burma is a land unfortunately stuck between communist China, greedy-Capitalist India and troubled Bangladesh.
Moral ASEAN leaders can help, and so can Europe in strategically persuading the Myanmar government to include Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in the reconciliation and reconstruction of the Burmese Civilisation/State.
Ms.Buzzi, think of co-operative ways to inject harmonious/sympathetic diplomacy on Myanmar issues, not divisive, shallow Anglo-Saxon perspectives only using the English language to destroy and colonize the interpretational context of indigenous cultures of Southeast Asian people who live in poverty.
Your high-brow, pessimistic doctorate tone of the article does not represent the voice of Burmese people. Please read more books on Asia before writing rubbish.

Tom Tun Wrote:
12/03/2010
If enlightened Ghandi were still alive he would have chosen the high moral approach of engagement or disengagement. Maybe India has finally lost great leaders who really know right from wrong, not just from the basic economy or territorial interest.
India is ignorant about Burma human rights abuses. I believe India leaders know more about human rights abuses than critics like me.
Leading a country and making a hard choice, Indian leader made definitely a wrong choice. While the whole world is busy grebbing money, whoever suffers or dies becomes a not quite important matter for some business enterprises and countries. When did money become above humanity? The poor countries are searching for money to get a better state. Wealthy countries defend their interests seriously over humanity. But, remember not all wealthy countries are unethical.

Kerry Wrote:
11/03/2010
India does not need to align itself in any way in 2010 with such grubby and brutal money.

India is admired in the world for so many humane things. Whole nations have sadly of late dealt more with China out of fear of their avarice and brutality. It is time the world begins to take better care of our very good friendship with India.

more articles in this section