Donor Dispute Shakes Six-party Alliance
covering burma and southeast asia
Wednesday, January 14, 2026
Interview

Donor Dispute Shakes Six-party Alliance


By THE IRRAWADDY Monday, October 18, 2010


COMMENTS (1)
RECOMMEND (462)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Than Nyein, chairman of the National Democratic Force (NDF) talks to journalists at its headquarters in Rangoon. (Photo: AP)
Early this month, six pro-democracy parties formed a political alliance to win the election and to work together in parliament. However, a few days after its formation, the alliance was shaken by a dispute over a donation to the National Democratic Force (NDF), the leading democratic party. The Myanmar Post,a local journal, reported that Hla Maung Shwe, a Rangoon-based businessman who is close to the ruling generals and an executive board member of the Union Myanmar Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (UMFCCI), gave financial support to some candidates who will run under the flag of the NDF.

Htet Aung, chief reporter of The Irrawaddy’s election desk, interviewed Dr. Than Nyein, the chairman of the NDF, about the donation and the resignation of Party for Democracy and Peace (PDP). 

He also interviewed Aung Than, the chairman of the PDP and a supreme court lawyer, about the PDP's resignation from the alliance.

Interview with Dr Than Nyein:

Question: According to the Political Party Registration Law, parties are allowed to receive donations from individual citizens or organizations and to set up a business of their own in order to raise party funds. Why did the dispute over the money that your party received from a businessman occur?

Dr Than Nyein: A party can operate its activities only if they have funds. We received the money in accord with the law issued by the Election Commission. We can’t do anything which is outside the legal framework. In this case, only those who criticized us will know why they targeted us.

Q: Taking the example of elections in Burma and in the world, an election-related financial dispute among political parties usually happens only after the election. What do you think of the timing?

A: [Laughing] If it's a real problem that needs to be tackled, we don’t hesitate to do it. But we don’t need to solve it if someone is just trying to make trouble for us on purpose.

Q: Hla Maung Shwe is a businessman widely known as having a close relation with the ruling generals, as well as one of the founders of Myanmar Egress, a social organization working in the field of education. What do you think his intention was when he talked to the media about his financial support of political parties?

A: He wrote a personal letter to apologize to us for what happened. In the letter, he explained that he didn’t give an interview to the Myanmar Post regarding his financial support, but he did talk to one of his friends about that. The journal got this information through his friend. Therefore, we don’t think that he had any intention to harm our party.

Q: Aung Than, the chairman of Party for Democracy and Peace(PDP), said the reason their party resigned from the six-party alliance is that from the legal point of view, the NDF can’t accept the money from Hla Maung Shwe who currently has a position in the UMFCCI, which is a junta’s institution, and it [the donation] can’t be in accord with the law. How do you  respond to that?

A: The candidates that Hla Maung Shwe helped are less than five, and as far as I know, there may be two or three candidates [who received money from him]. In fact, he helped only a few candidates who are friendly with him. We can’t bar our candidates from receiving such financial support. However, we didn’t know about that in advance. Regarding the issue that U Hla Maung Shwe has a relation with the junta and has a position in a government institution, it is better to ask him directly and for me not to answer on his behalf.

We tried to increase our strength through an alliance of the democratic parties that have a vision that we can do work together for the betterment of the country. We took the responsibility to explain what we were doing honestly.



1  |  2  next page »

COMMENTS (1)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Ko Maung Wrote:
19/10/2010
Everybody can promote an approach to their own problem. The NDF does so too, peacefully. We must tolerate diverse approaches. This is essence of democracy.

I do appreciate the NDF's approach to participate in the polls by applying the theory of democratic principles. Normative in states: There is the normal division of estates into an executive, a legislature and a judiciary. The triad political model was first developed in ancient Greece.

The norms for the governance of democratic states are the constitution and the elections. Functionality of parliamentary system: the executive is drawn from the legislature. There is control by a minority opposition, often by an independent judiciary. The government's role in the parliament does not give them unlimited legislative influence.

The NDF likes to take responsibility for the executive, legislature and judiciary powers. Open debates on the country's economy and social welfare will definitely occur with NDF's part in future. Let theNDF struggle for itself.

more articles in this section