ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
China and Burma: No Longer Birds of a Feather?
By AUNG ZAW Wednesday, October 5, 2011


COMMENTS (11)
RECOMMEND (401)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 2)

Burma is also strategically important to China, because it is only through Burma that China has access to the Bay of Bengal and the Indian Ocean, and Chinese naval vessels made port calls in Burma for the first time last year.

For these reasons, China also does not want to overreact to the Myitsone Dam suspension and push Burma into the arms of the West.

It is a well known fact, however, that some Burmese leaders—including some in uniform—want to distance Burma from China. Therefore, some pundits argue that it is time for the West to change its Burma policy and be more accommodating to the leaders of the new government. But the US has thus far insisted that Burma make concrete reforms, including the release of political prisoners, a comprehensive dialogue with the opposition and ethnic leaders and cooperation with a CoI.

In any event, one thing is clear: Burma under President Thein Sein has a chance to develop a closer relationship with the West if speedy and substantive reforms are undertaken in the near future.

Thant Myint-U, author of "Where China Meets India: Burma and the New Crossroads of Asia" (a must-read book on Burma), concluded that progress in Burma would be a boon for the region, and a peaceful, prosperous and democratic Burma would be a game-changer for all Asia. Everyone would like to see Thant Myint-U’s happy ending scenario become a reality, and in order to move in that direction it is important for Burma to re-enter and integrate into the world community with dignity.

It is time for Burma to step out of China’s shadow and embrace the West and regional neighbors in order to gain new allies that help counter China’s influence. To make this happen, Burma’s president Thein Sein must make major political reforms in Burma, and perhaps the suspension of the Myitsone Dam project was his first step in that direction.



  1  |  2  | 



COMMENTS (11)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Moe Aung Wrote:
12/10/2011
I doubt it if Howard Yeong meant the Chinese living in the dark. NIMBYism in the West is a well recognized phenomenon and refers to domestic projects in the main. But if Howard hasn't clocked that power generated from the dam and the offshore gas are both earmarked for China and not for domestic use, like the Yadana and Yetagun gas for Thailand, I'm not sure who's ignorant but it's most definitely not the Burmese people.

What personal gain can the activists of the Shwe Gas Movement expect I wonder? The govt will confiscate every piece of land and fell every bit of forest along the way from the Rakhine Coast across the Burman heartlands and over the Shan uplands to Kunming while all the locals blink in the dark.

Philip Kyin is right however in pointing out we shouldn't also suspend vigilance and drop our guard over the govt's smart maneuvers in an effort to have the sanctions lifted and secure the Chair of ASEAN.

Nyunt Han Wrote:
12/10/2011
@ Tettoe Aung

"the government that came into power by legitimate means" ?? You must be joking !

tocharian Wrote:
08/10/2011
Is Howard Yeong a member of the Wu Mao Dang?

Phillip Kyin Wrote:
08/10/2011
Ko Nyi Nyi, I understood what Howard Yeong meant. What is the difference between the 90% Chinese with no electricity and 100% Burmese with no electricity? They all lack the basic necessity. How will those 90% Chinese pay for the electricity? I don't think CPI is giving electricity for free. I just would like to see everybody has electricity to enjoy life.

Nyi Nyi Wrote:
07/10/2011
Howard Yeong is referring to Chinese people who live without electricity in China because 90% of electricity generated from the dam will go to them.

Phillip Kyin Wrote:
07/10/2011
Excellent words of wisdom from Howard Yeoung. I cannot say the same about Mualcin's. I think for Burma, we need reliable power source whether it is from hydro or fossil. Don't worry about the emission or pollution for now. It's too bad that with all the manpower in Burma we cannot build these vital power plants.

One thing I noticed about these new articles on Thein Sein's decision to suspend the project, everybody is changing their tune on the regime. Can he be cooking something else behind his latest decision? I think we are too quick to embrace his or his regime decisions.

Oo Maung gyi Wrote:
07/10/2011
President Thein Sein needs to have both physical and moral courage so that he can resist any amount of pressure from china.
Those are the contacts signed during military regime should be passed by the existing parliament other wise those do not recognize as legal contracts. As such how can china sue Myitsone project under international laws.

As for gas line and train project also must be obtained parliament approval, at the same time how can Burma effort to provide china naval base at Kyaukpyu. That issue is more serious and Arakan will become part of China and the danger of bay of Bengal security with many nations is a question.

Mualcin Wrote:
06/10/2011
China has exploited too much out of the ignorant Burmese dictators for too long. All the Chinese must be expelled from the Union of Burma.

Howard Yeong Wrote:
06/10/2011
Those claiming the dam will do nothing but evil must have been living in their luxurious electricity powered house, without any mercy of people living in darkness all the years.

Democracy is important, out rights are important, but that does not mean we should uphold the "Not In My Back Yard" mentality as the American do.

Be cautious about those who cry afoul of the dam project with some hidden political agenda. They are using ignorant Burmese people as their political tools for their personal political gains.

Power shortage creates the greatest inequality in our country. No electricity, no hope of development and elimination of poverty. Think about it!

Howard Yeong Wrote:
06/10/2011
I think those people living without electricity should unite and demonstrate that Burmese people deserve a decent life and the government should give revision to the dam project to protect the environment and carry on it, instead of cancelling it once for all.

Tettoe Aung Wrote:
06/10/2011
Yes, they are no longer to be 'birds of a feather'. If neither China nor the regime in Burma a 'scapegoat' soon they both be 'birds without feathers' at all. When common knowledge in law is that if something is not legal in the first place can never be legal at any stage. China, for it own interests, is up to its hilt in support of an illegitimate military government but the contracts it enter into with the illegitimate cannot be honoured by the government that came into power by legitimate means. We'll have to wait and see. Let's hope that they both don't fall into the hands of a monkey who likes to pluck feathers off the birds.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.