ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Hurricane McCain Blows into Burma with Message of Change
By AUNG ZAW Friday, June 3, 2011


COMMENTS (7)
RECOMMEND (384)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

During his 2008 presidential campaign, US Sen John McCain branded himself as a maverick and a straight shooter. It didn't win him the election, but the image has stuck. And now, as he completes a three-day visit to Burma, his reputation for speaking his own mind has been put to good purpose, bringing a gust of fresh air to a stale debate about how the West should respond to the country's recent transition to quasi-civilian rule.

It was clear from the outset that McCain's visit wasn't going to be like those of senior State Department officials—emissaries of the Obama administration's policy of “pragmatic engagement”—or even that of fellow senator Jim Webb, who traveled to Burma in 2009 and met with junta supremo Than Shwe.

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

Unlike Webb, who skirted the issue of how the regime treats its own people, and focused instead on extracting a US citizen the junta was only too happy to be rid of (while also plugging the idea of abandoning sanctions that stand in the way of US investment in resource-rich Burma), McCain put the plight of Burma's people front and center.

He did this even before he arrived in the country to meet with Burmese officials and opposition and ethnic leaders, by visiting the Thai border town of Mae Sot, home to hundreds of thousands of Burmese refugees, migrant workers and political activists.

But this was more than a symbolic detour. The trip to Mae Sot—a town also visited by former first lady Laura Bush in 2008—gave McCain a chance to see for himself that conflict in Burma is alive and well, and still destroying countless lives.

It also sent a message to Thailand, which has suggested that the end of overtly military rule in Burma means that refugees no longer need to remain on Thai soil, that the world is still watching what is happening on its borders. And it served as a reminder to McCain's colleagues on Capitol Hill, where many of his fellow Republicans are looking for ways to shrink the budget, that this isn't the time to think of cutting back on aid for refugees.

This wasn't McCain's first trip to Burma. Fifteen years ago, he met opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi during a visit to the country, and he has made many attempts to return since then. Indeed, speaking today at the US Embassy in Rangoon, he said, “I acknowledge that this new government represents some change from the past, and one illustration of this change was their willingness to allow me to return to this country after 15 years worth of attempts to do so on my part were rejected.”
 
If the new government hoped that this gesture would make McCain rethink his position on certain issues, it was mistaken. In his press briefing, he reiterated his call for the “unconditional release of all political prisoners of conscience” and stated that for any process of national reconciliation to be deemed legitimate, it “would have to involve Aung San Suu Kyi, ethnic minority and other opposition leaders, and the National League for Democracy.”

None of these are radical ideas, but in the wake of last year's election, and amid all the talk of “failed” sanctions and the need for a new approach to Burma, there has been serious discussion of whether Suu Kyi and her party are obstacles to progress. By stating that they are in fact key to the country's political future, McCain swept aside efforts by President Thein Sein to placate its foreign critics with platitudes about “good governance” and challenged his government to take meaningful action that could pave the way to closer ties with Washington.

“The United States is not condemned to have bad relations with any country, as our recent experience with neighboring Vietnam demonstrates,” said McCain, a Vietnam War veteran and former prisoner of war. But at the same time, he left no doubt that Burma's rulers can't hope for any real improvement in relations with the West as long as they continue to mistreat their own citizens. 

An important test of how much responsibility the new government is willing to take for the well-being of Burmese citizens will be the way it responds to Suu Kyi's plans to visit supporters outside of Rangoon.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (7)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Tin Wrote:
14/06/2011
The world is on the basic of self interest. you agree or not it is universal general human law.

So, I suggest you, the so-called Myanmar Juntas' Democratic Government, that you need to be very careful on your each and every future step. Frankly, the west or/and Americans are very smart in global political on either diplomacy or else. They do not need to care anything if they want something to happen. For example, when they want they, them-self breed or raise the dictators in Middle East and now what happen. Like Al Queda's story.

Therefore, it is my honest advice for the sake of all our people.

Thank you.

Oo Maung gyi Wrote:
09/06/2011
Burmese Independence was fall on 4th January, 1948 under the treaty of Nu-Atlee in which it was written as " Burma" not "Myanmar". Historically it was correct that 11th century it was Myanmar Naing-gan established by King Anawratha at Bagan, the central Burma. If military Junta change the name is illegitimate, to change a country name requires parliament approval; and where is the parliament during the time of Than Shwe era? Whatever laws and degrees promulgated during the time of military rule is invalid after the convening of parliament, or otherwise parliament has to make approval. So now is the time President Thein Sein has to consider how to make his good governance.

rufus plungemongrel Wrote:
08/06/2011
why don't you sponsor a survey of the citizens of burma/myanmar to find out how many of them want the americans and europeans to lift their sanctions?

Oo Maung gyi Wrote:
07/06/2011
If President Thein Sein and young generals who have taken the charge of the jops of regional commanders and commander in chiefs are clever enough fro the sake of the country
they should reconcile with tri-party dialogue immediately before the country happen alike middle east. Now President Thein Sein has to call all his immediate responsible personals including Bama Tatmadaw
commander in chief to solve the problem of future for which they are going to face and the best way out and to be a good governance
to reconcile with opposition party NLD which won the militay (Tatmadaw )sponsored election of 1990.

Myint Thein, Dallas Wrote:
07/06/2011
The requirements for removal of American sanctions was clearly articulated by Senator John McCain. The Burmese generals may not like these conditions, but they clearly understood the message since it was delivered by an American War Hero who was the Republican Party nominee for US President in 2008. The US State Department does not seem to understand that you cannot send officials at the Deputy Director-General or Director-General level to negotiate with a Head of State. This is why I preferred Madeleine Albright, the former Secretary of State, as the US Special Envoy for Burma.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
06/06/2011
The Man From Arizona shoots straight from the hip since day one of his landing at Naypyidaw.

And he MEANS BUSINESS as well.

His talk of WINDS OF CHANGE is NO JOKE either.

Mubarak, ben ALi, Gaddafi and others in the Middle East and Africa are FEELING THE HEAT as the result.

When the Americans SAY SOMETHING THEY MEAN IT as well.

bin Laden and others in al Queda know best
and after LOSING their lives no less.
Hence, in this case as well, if Than Shwe/Thein Sein fails to take HEED, then he stands to lose his HEAD, lest he forgets.

Kyaik-ka-san Wrote:
05/06/2011
20 months of engagement fruits none indicated something wrong? We are reminded the Bush Admin will escalate every possible punishment if junta plays tricks. Junta underestimates Obama. If junta regard the latter is too mild then it will be a great blunder.

The US is legendary to achieve optimum goals by acting at suitable “timing” and targeting for “multi-purpose”. To sideline China, push strategic partner with ASEANs as US shifts its focus from Central Asia to Asia-Pacific, while allying with India are a great show underway.

Gates reassures Asian allies in Singapore are actually pinpointed to Asean. In this case how it may let Burma be a spoiler on its way. Unless it performs genuine changes, it will be forced to change. This is the theme of what McCain reminded in Rangoon, and what Senate committee will demand Obama to do in the end.

While global changing wind is knocking strongly, it is pity that generals and Mg Lwin are yet staying at non-sense “Burma or Myanmar” issue.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.