ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Burma: Still a Pariah
By AUNG ZAW Thursday, March 31, 2011


COMMENTS (4)
RECOMMEND (497)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

If you read The New Light of Myanmar today hoping to find signs of change in Burma, you can be forgiven for feeling a bit despondent. Ex-Gen Thein Sein's inaugural speech as the country's newly minted president gave no indication that his government—sworn in just yesterday—has any intention of breaking with the policies of the past two decades.

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

The central message was clear: The army remains in charge, and real reform, if it ever comes, will only do so at a pace that Burma's entrenched military rulers approve of.

Among other things, Thein Sein laid out his foreign policy in his address to Parliament. Vowing to stand firm as a respected member of the global community, he invited nations wishing to see “democracy flourish” in Burma to cooperate with his government. To this end, he called on foreign governments to end “various forms” of pressure on Burma, “including assistance and encouragement to the anti-government groups and economic manipulations.”

But Thein Sein, a staunch loyalist of Snr-Gen Than Shwe, the head of the now-dissolved State Peace and Development Council, is not likely to get his wish.

Shortly after his speech, US State Department Acting Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner dismissed the nominal transfer of authority in Burma from military to civilian figures as “immaterial.” Military leaders are still in control, he said, meaning that sanctions would remain in place, even as the Obama administration continues to try to engage the Burmese authorities.

Toner told Voice of America that the US urges the Burmese authorities to release all political prisoners, recognize the legitimacy of Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy party, and enter into a genuine, inclusive, dialogue with all democratic and ethnic-based opposition groups “as a first step toward reconciliation.”

There was nothing in Thein Sein's speech to suggest that any of this would happen anytime in the foreseeable future. So Burma's longstanding pariah status in the international community looks set to continue.

It's doubtful that Thein Sein will ever exercise his executive power to free Burma's more than 2,000 prisoners of conscience, grant an amnesty for political dissidents, recognize the existence of opposition parties that decided not to contest in the 2010 election and order an end to the army's aggression toward ethnic groups. Even if he wanted to do any of these things, it really isn't in his power to do anything without the approval of his boss, Than Shwe.

Although Than Shwe has slipped into the shadows and is no longer the face of the ruling military clique, it is clear that he is still very much in command. As the de facto leader, he will continue to steer the country along the same course as he has since first taking the helm in 1992.

What this means in concrete terms is that there will be no compromise with the West. Instead, China will continue to exercise growing influence over Burma as its rulers look to Beijing as their chief source of foreign support.

To underline this fact, Jia Qinglin, the fourth highest-ranking leader in the Chinese politburo hierarchy, will be visiting Burma soon to meet the country's new president and senior government officials.  China has already invested heavily in Burma's “transition” by endorsing the outcome of last year's bogus election, so it should come as no surprise that it is eager to lend as much legitimacy as it can to Thein Sein's puppet government.

So where does this leave Western policy makers, particularly in Washington, which has taken the lead in imposing tough penalties on the Burmese regime? Having already ruled out the possibility of lifting sanctions under the current circumstances, the US may now consider even more stringent measures, including more targeted sanctions. This could happen even if blanket sanctions are eventually lifted.

Another thing the US can do is appoint a full-time special representative and policy coordinator on Burma, as authorized by the 2008 JADE Act.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (4)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

tocharian Wrote:
03/04/2011
Burma a pariah state? Definitely not for Peking. Mian Dian is an important new dependent client state of China.

Big-shot-politburo-chinamen are coming soon to Naypyidaw to give their blessings (and bribe Than Shwe with some prime real estate property for his family in China, just in case, something happens and he has to leave Burma)

U HLAWIN Wrote:
01/04/2011
The 2010 elections were held with the frauds and fraudulent by ending up with the winning of the military backed Union Solidarity and Development Party led by the ex-military personnel and their cohorts as we all know. On top of that, from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, the State Supreme Council is an eight-membered supreme advisory body to the civilian-run Government of Burma, which will take over power on 30 March 2011. It is not defined or mandated by the 2008 Burmese Constitution.[2] News reports have suggested that Than Shwe will head this body. Other members are from the State Peace and Development Council and include Vice Senior-General Maung Aye, Pyithu Hluttaw Lower House Speaker Thura Shwe Mann, President-elect Thein Sein, Vice President-elect Thiha Thura Tin Aung Myint Oo, former Lt. Gen Tin Aye and other two senior military. generals. And, that is what Ban Ki-moon calls it as a positive step forward. For all of us though, pig on the lipsticks is still a pig.


Maung Maung (Mandalay) Wrote:
01/04/2011
Bravo! You may still call General Thein Sein as General Thein Sein as retired army officers are entitled to be addressed as such like General Charles de Gaulle of France and Marshall Tito of now defunct Yugoslavia. In addition, General Thein Sein remains under the command of Sr.General Than Shwe and however much they try to pretend to be a democratically elected government. It' still a military government as the members of Thein Sein's cabinet are mostly made of army personnel starting with him whether "officially" retired or not. The military rule states that any retired person can be reinstated at any time if the government or army so requires!

It's glaringly significant that Commander in Chief of the Burma's Armed Forces General Min Aung Hlaing was not appointed by the parliament or the president, but by Sr.General Than Shwe who is above the constitution and cabinet! How on earth this cabinet is democratic and popular!? A government of the people, by the people, for the people? No.

Terry Evans Wrote:
01/04/2011
If it acts outside international norms, if it acts outside accepted international behavior, then it can't be surprised if the international community treats it like a pariah.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.