ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
The Dictator’s Survival Guide
By KYAW ZWA MOE Friday, February 18, 2011


COMMENTS (11)
RECOMMEND (521)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

What are the secrets to a dictator’s survival? Why do some authoritarian regimes collapse following popular uprisings while others remain in power?

Let's take a look at the Arab world and the national protests that seem to be spreading like wildfire from one country to another. Egypt and Tunisia saw their despots fall victim to mass uprisings, and the people of Libya, Syria, Yemen and Algeria are now taking to the streets in an attempt to remove their own authoritarian regimes.   

Kyaw Zwa Moe is managing editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

The popular revolts that led to the demise of Tunisian leader Zine Al-Abidine Ben Ali and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak seem to have sprung out of nowhere. But who in fact kicked them off?  

In Tunisia, it all started when a young Tunisian vegetable seller, Mohamed Bouazizi, was slapped by a policewoman in broad daylight and his wares were confiscated. As a result, the 26-year-old set himself on fire, and his subsequent death on Jan 4 sparked an uprising that led to the downfall of a dictator who had ruled the country for 23 years.
 
But that was not the end of the story. The successful revolt in Tunisia inspired the people of Egypt to topple Mubarak, whose 30-year rule ended only 18 days after the uprising began.

So the tragic act of defiance by a young vegetable vendor acted as the catalyst that brought down two powerful dictators who had ruled for decades — with more possibly to fall before the political sand storm in the desert finally settles.

We Burmese had our own Bouazizi, but unfortunately not the same end result.

Phone Maw was a fifth year student at the Rangoon Institute of Technology who was killed by riot police on March 13, 1988. His death sparked a nationwide popular uprising that toppled the Socialist regime of Ne Win, Burma's first dictator who had ruled the country for 26 years.     

But Phone Maw's sacrifice did not eradicate dictatorship in Burma. His death led to Ne Win’s downfall in 1988, but the military dictatorship carried on since then, and in 1992 it appointed Than Shwe — an even more ruthless and oppressive dictator—as the new junta chief.

Two decades later, Snr-Gen Than Shwe is still in power. But he is aging and desirous of a legacy, so he is now orchestrating Burma’s transition to a “civilian dictatorship” in an effort to prolong the life of one of the world’s longest-running regimes while at the same time attempting to prolong his own.

Between Ne Win and Than Shwe (and a couple of care-taker despots in between), the Burmese people have now been ruled by a dictator for almost 50 years during a time when many other dictators have bitten the dust.

Ferdinand Marcos ruled the Philippines from 1965 to 1986 before he was ousted by “People Power.” The Philippines later became one of the leading democratic nations in Southeast Asia despite experiencing several insurgencies.

Indonesian dictator Suharto ruled for 31 years until mass protests led to his political demise in 1998. The fall of Suharto brought democracy and a promising economy to Indonesia.    

In 1989, East Germany’s Erich Honecker lost the power he had held for 18 years when the Soviet Union collapsed.

Likewise, dictators Mobutu Sese Seko of the Congo, Augusto Pinochet of Chile, Nicolae Ceausescu of Romania and Jean-Claude Duvalier of Haiti were all deposed during the last few decades.        
 
But in Burma, the dictators have managed not just to cling to power, but to build a foundation for maintaining their stranglehold on the country for the foreseeable future. Clearly, they have studied the unwritten rules of the “Dictator’s Survival Guide” and taken its lessons to heart.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (11)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

saw greh Wrote:
02/03/2011
No wonder why funding have been cut to Irrawaddy by donors. Why on earth do we have a journalist that proclaims to stride for democratic change in Burma instead endorse a brutal technique of a cruel dictator we all try to get rid off. Every right mind of Irrawaddy readers and Burmese people who want to see change need to demand his resignation or at least his apology for this article.

jon hart Wrote:
01/03/2011
haha wo i wrote a blog entry for one of my uni classes doing something along the exact lines of this article, really wierd:

http://politicalwrapfromthehart.blogspot.com/2011/02/lessons-from-fellow-tyrant-4-things_09.html

Tom Tun Wrote:
27/02/2011
I am quite surprised to see that Kyaw Zwa Moe wrote such article. I am thinking of the reason for this article. Is this article contribute positively to the society? Is this article mainly true? I think this article doesn't contribute positively and it is not completely true either. First of all, Kyaw Zwa Moe doesn't talk about human conscience and nature of Power. There are a few good dictators in this world but non the less they are dictators and the future of their countries is never stable. First example, former Yugoslavia and Marshal Tito, who is a good dictator and kept his power and his country stable until he died, but after his death there were Bosnia, Serbia conflicts. Although there are problems in middle east, people fail to see UAE, why does UAE stable? King of UAE is fairly good leader and great visionary. I believe one should study how Tito and king of UAE hold the power and country together. No dictator can hold on to power endlessly. It is the truth.

Kyaik-ka-sak Wrote:
25/02/2011
Ben Ali and Hosni Mubarak are educated and with sense of humanity and integrity. They have ability to decide for serving their people or swimming in the sin-pool, at the critical moment.

Though born in Buddhist Burma Than Shwe and cronies lack these basic norms and morality. They knew only killing Monks and pushing Burma into hell.

Than Shwe and Gaddafi are rotten fishes on the same boat. They are making similar history like Hitler but not applying survival guide.

Their final days are numbered!

Option Wrote:
25/02/2011
That is only one way, as long as destroy to Army which is the core of Junta. Then they will be automatically become downtime. Now see just a part of DKBA reg.5 started and killed as much as soldiers of Burma Army then the inside of Junta started fear and try to find ways such as Than Shwe bought home in China etc. So all are depends on how much Burma Army collapse or defeated. Last '88 we didn't win because Burma Army won two places such as Methawall & Mine Yung battles. So it is cleared Burma Army totally defeated and the Junta regime can fall down.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
21/02/2011
Than Shwe's trump card in this game is not his ingenuity or luck for that matter I say.
He simply sold his soul and self to the Chinese communists in Beijing while surrendering all of Burma as well in this matter.

He keeps the people at gunpoint while baring his back hole for the Chinese communists next door for covering his ass in the international arena.

The despots in the Middle East fare worse for hedging their bets on US and the west for their future of course.

The Arab dictators are falling like flies today because they put their bets on the wrong horses like US, UK, UN and others prone to ditching their proteges - Korea, Vietnam and others - when the going gets rough and out of hand.

China would not even bat an eye to 'stuff' the likes of Than Shwe, Mugabe, Bashir and others with hardware, nukes even, if needed for that matter.

Hence, Than Shwe's survival card is Hu Jintao and the communists in Beijing.

U HLAWIN Wrote:
20/02/2011
With regard to the recent Egypt and the other nations in middle-east’s crisis, so many factors like globalization, global worming, food crisis and the long lasting dictatorship must be put into the account. The clip of the matter however is how the military will respond to it. That has been the problem for Burma since the dusk of U Nu’s era. Quite frankly, the 8888 uprising couldn’t be intimidated by the youth movements in Egypt. We had fought our heart out energetically, systematically and bravely for more than a month. Still, we the general people of Burma still have the will and the way to fight for it. We have just been waiting for the right moment for sure.

Thein Win Wrote:
20/02/2011
Mubarak was very kind to his people. He didn't use Military to kill his own people. He's not like a Rubbish Than Shwe.

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
20/02/2011
You can't write a dictator's survial guide as a universal precription. WE have been telling you to look out for differences rahter than similarities.

By differences cannot be similarities by definition; so ther can be no single theory, as yet.

But we do know the answer!

If you care to email us, we can have an intelligent dialogue with you.

Otherwise, keep bashing the junta and attacking individuals, rather than the system and the environment. OK, wise guy?

timothy Wrote:
20/02/2011
Yes, Than Shwe had learned from each and every steps of his movements crushing the popular uprisings one after another. Yes, he had successfully, ruthlessly able to put down public discontents with military fascist grip.

He is the head of military but with such a ruthless purges of his own colleagues, he had made so many enemies in army circles. These ghosts will bite him back. There will be another 1988-style Revolution in horizon now. There is no such thing as Dictator-safe notebooks. People had also learned the mistakes. The ethnics liberation forces had joined hands. One sparked on the time-bomb of social inequalities will set the blast loud enough to kick the despot out of power. Than Shwe knew it very well.I can not wish him luck for his final days.Sorry.

tocharian Wrote:
19/02/2011
So what's the survival guide for the NLD and the Irrawaddy? (if Than Shwe is that "good" at being a dictator) I think you are overrating him. In my opinion, Than Shwe got many of his marching orders from Peking, a lot more so than Ne Win.

From a more fundamental point of view, the "success" of despots in Burma (there were many other cases in Burmese history way before the last 50 years) is mainly caused by endogenous factors and is due to the nature of Burmese society, especially the upper-class (or wannabe elites). Of course there are exogenous factors at work as well, like colonialism, first British and now this Chinese "Great Leapfrog Forward" (like rabbits this year!), but I wouldn't give Than Shwe full credit for his "success". He just happens to know Burmese mentality very well (much better than I do!) and played the Chinese card. So now what?

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.