ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
It's the Same Old, Same Old in Burma
By KYAW ZWA MOE Tuesday, February 1, 2011


COMMENTS (13)
RECOMMEND (454)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

The current speculation about who will become Burma's next president, vice presidents and chairpersons of the houses of parliament is a ridiculous sideshow.  
 
In most countries, finding out who will hold key government positions is normally helpful in sensing what the political landscape and climate might be. But Burma is a political climate-controlled country and only one man, junta chief Snr-Gen Than Shwe, is allowed to touch the dial.

Just look at what happened inside the country's first parliamentary sessions on Tuesday following the unannounced resignation of all junta ministers, including Prime Minister Thein Sein, from their previous government positions.

Kyaw Zwa Moe is managing editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

First, Thein Sein nominated ex Gen Shwe Mann, the No 3 ranking junta official, as chairperson of the Lower House (People's Parliament) and Aung Thaung, the former minister of industry, supported the proposal. With the combined forces of the military and the junta's proxy party, the United Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), controlling over 80 percent of the seats in the lower house, Shwe Mann was of course elected.

Then Khin Aung Myint, the former minister of culture, was just as easily elected as head of the Upper House (Nationalities' Parliament), which is also dominated by military and USDP representatives. The process, which was identical to that in the Lower House, will become routinely and nauseatingly familiar to all Burma watchers in the future: a USDP MP nominates a former junta minister to his new post, another USDP MP supports the nomination, and all USDP and military MP's vote in favor.
 
No surprises at all, just the way the puppet-master wants things run.

The next step is to elect three vice-presidents, and from that pool of junta operatives, elect a president. We received reports today that ex-prime minister and USDP representative Thein Sein, and Phalon Sawaw Democratic Party representative Saw Thein Aung, were nominated for the vice-presidential slot to be selected by the Lower House.

And for the Upper House's vice-presidential selection, Sai Mawk Kham, a USDP representative, and Aye Maung, the leader of Rakhine Nationalities Development Party, were nominated. 

The military representatives, who make up 25 percent of both houses, are allowed to select the third vice-president, and they reportedly chose ex-General Tin Aung Mhyint Oo, the secretary-1 of the State Peace and Development Council, which is the junta's ruling body.

This means that of the five nominees for the three vice-presidential positions, a convenient three are also members of the USDP. Once again, no surprises. And this makes it easy to predict that Thein Sein, Tin Aung Myint Oo and Sai Mawk Kham, all USDP members, will ultimately be chosen as the three vice-presidents.

But the top question that Burmese journalists have raised and Burmese commentators have asked is: Who will be the president?

Most previous speculation centered around whether Than Shwe would engineer himself into the position. But since he chose not to make himself one of the vice-presidential nominees, he cannot become president. To predict who will nominally hold the position in his stead, however, is not difficult either: The “Oscar” will go to Thein Sein.

The 65-year-old ex-prime minister is considered the “international figure” among the ranks of regime leaders. Since 2007, when he was appointed PM, he has attended several summits of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) and visited several Asean countries. During that same time, Than Shwe avoided such summits and regional meetings like the plague.

In fact, Than Shwe has seen Thein Sein as Burma's political “head of the state” since the time he appointed him prime minister. But that does not mean that Thein Sein ever had significant power in the old regime, or ever will have such power in the new government. It simply means that nothing at all has changed: Thein Sein will serve as Than Shwe's primary puppet going forward, just as he served in the past.
 
So the only question remaining is what position, if any, Than Shwe will chose to hold in the new government.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (13)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Adam Selene Wrote:
11/02/2011
Tom Tun wrote: "Please read "It is politic, Stupid". May be the way I see things are different than you see it. I believe "Human Rights" are not given by government, but just need to be born as Human."

I read the piece you mentioned and was actually bothered by the flawed thinking in it. But that's another story.

With regards to human rights: the UN charter states that human rights are universal but in practice there are many malicious governments - like the Burmese regime - who effectively have stripped their peoples of human rights.

The question is: what are you gonna do about it? It's clear what you want, but like most Burmese activists you offer no solutions nor any realism... Come on, you can do better!

Tom Tun Wrote:
10/02/2011
Adam Selene,
Please read "It is politic, Stupid". May be the way I see things are different than you see it. I believe "Human Rights" are not given by government, but just need to be born as Human. I am preaching for open and transparent society, so I don't need hidden card. Burma must change and time is now. Alot of people around the world think some society do not deserve to have freedom and Democracy and should go on under opression of dictatorial politic. It is just an insult to me as my core value is equality and freedom. Civil disobedience is and may be moral weapon to fight injustice, but brutal opressive regime deserve violance. It is justifiable to give them back what they do to the people. Do not think it is impossible. Time will tell that time of tyranny is over.

Adam Selene Wrote:
08/02/2011
Tom Tun said: "If there is only labour rights selectively, how can society be balance? What we want is open, free and transparent society. Nothing less."

Easy to say, but what is your plan? I was just pointing out that progress is small but that there are some tiny highlights. I think a constitution is better than no constitution and I think labour union organization is better than no civil society at all.

You seem to want it all at once. I can understand. But the junta didn't give it to you for 23 years since 88. And they still are in full control.

How about considering this a small step towards the end goal and making the best of it, instead of doing nothing because you are not satisfied?

If you want the army to keep considering you its enemy then this is the right way to do it. The opposition scared them, that's one of the reasons why they are totally unwilling to give up control. You should've kept your cards closer to your chest and use more honey.

Wallace Hla Wrote:
06/02/2011
Now that the supreme monarch A-Laung-Gyi Than Shwe has decreed, Thein Sein, Tin Aung Myint Oo and Sai Mouk Kham to hold the roles of top jesters of the court, aside from continuing to plunder the country, one wonders what kind of different pantomimes they have in mind to entertain and please the likes of Suphaya-Kyaing, the crown prince and princesses designates of this evil dynasty..??

name me please,
Wallace Hla

DetDoe Wrote:
05/02/2011
What is very amusing to you, stupid Myanmar Idiot?

So far countless ordinary (innocent) Burmese citizens, monks and nuns were dead and injured in the hand of Than Shwe, who you considered a great Myanmar Patriots. If I remember correctly of your previous posts, your Shwe Bo Ming(tha)II fully approves of his (Than Shwe's) actions and misdeeds.
Why are you so jealous of DASSK? We love her and we would like her to be our leader.

Tom Tun Wrote:
05/02/2011
Adam Selene,
Why are you so hard to understand? The constitution is just to waste time. If you still don't get it, I will spell it out for you. Burma is not asking worker rights although it is just a tiny part of it. Industrial revolution and labour rights is old history. We are not that stupid to accept and swallow what ever regime shove it down into our throat. Society is built with, intelectual, white collar and blue collar labours, self employer, students, soldiers, lawers, stay home mothers, old age retire, farmers and countless alot other profession. If there is only labour rights selectively, how can society be balance? What we want is open, free and transparent society. Nothing less. What we have now is nothing important, even to have conversation. Another thing, are you willing to discuss about what have Labour Union in west countries becomming of and why large coporation such as GM is in red ink?

Wallace Hla Wrote:
05/02/2011
Is there no self-respect, no ethics, no integrity, no shame nor remorse left in these self-appointed rulers of the country? God help Burma and all their people regardless of what ethnic group they belong to.

name me,
Wallace Hla

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
03/02/2011
Tin Htet Sein Wrote:

02/02/2011
"It's no longer same old same old in Egypt now. The people are asking for Mubarak to step down right now and I think they are going to win. Irrawaddy and all the exiled media should take this great opportunity to broadcast this indormation to the people of Burma that a dictator is just about to bite the dust because of the people power."

HOW VERY AMUSING. A LITTLE KNOWLEDGE IS DANGEROUS.
So far 300 dead and 800 injured. Events are unfolding.
Now is the "game of chicken2. Look it us,boy, for definition wikipedia. Whilst at it also look up 'raison d'etet'.

Why not aks SuuKyi to go to Egypt.Burmese govt must allolw her to go there since since supports the protesters; a great PR opportunity for her. Go woman, go!

tocharian Wrote:
03/02/2011
I agree with Tin Htet Sein.
There was nothing reported in the official junta newspapers about what's happening in Egypt. China is also trying to block inquiries about Egypt on its Internet. "Irrawaddy" should be different. It should supply this information to the Burmese, especially since ASSK already publicly (in a BBC interview, I believe) supported the anti-Mubarak demonstrators. If Irrawaddy says Burma is "same old, same old" then Irrawaddy is also same old same old. Boring!

U HLAWIN Wrote:
03/02/2011
1. Everyone including the ethnic groups knows that the sham elections and the kangaroo court so called Myanmar parliament hold no water for the prosperity of Burma other than to prolong the dynasty of the mad-man Than Shwe who has hurt the nation so much for so long. The need for “dialogue” with all the stakeholders has never been mentioned by the regime knowing that it is the only way forward for the democratization of Burma. The regime well understood that through the talks the people could hope to accomplish national reconciliation and the removal of the military dictatorship and Than Shwe dynasty forever. That is the reason the political prisoners are kept in the jails and Daw Suu and NLD are denied in its political picture. Creating tremendous “fear” among the public is a part of its plan. Thus the regime is in denial of the inevitability of “change”. And, that is what is going to happen in Burma in the very near future somehow.

Nyi Nyi Wrote:
03/02/2011
Did anyone seriouly expect the new govenment to be different? There was no sign of this happening all along well before the election. Also, why would Than Shwe like to become a president if he can stay as a chief of staff in the army effectively controlling the president.

Adam Selene Wrote:
02/02/2011
The author is right in saying that the whole process has been a dissillusionment. Change is minimal, but there is some change, though. The NDF is in parliament, albeit with only 16 mp's. And the constitution has been ratified now. I prefer the rule of law to ruling by decree. And this constitution grants labour freedom, which is a step forward.

Most opposition politicians expected little this time around, they think they will have a better change in 5 years time, when they will have had time to prepare.

Another big thing is that this sham democracy will prove to be enough for many countries and companies to invest in Burma. The country awaits an economic boom. Much of this wealth will end up in the pocket of the new moguls and the military elite, but undeniable economic growth will lead to news jobs and raising of the living standards of ordinary Burmese.

I can understand Kyaw Zwa Moe is dissapointed. I am too. But its certainly not business as usual.

Tin Htet Sein Wrote:
02/02/2011
It's no longer same old same old in Egypt now. The people are asking for Mubarak to step down right now and I think they are going to win. Irrawaddy and all the exiled media should take this great opportunity to broadcast this indormation to the people of Burma that a dictator is just about to bite the dust because of the people power.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.