|
||
|
|
COMMENTARY
Who should be named Burma's 2010 Person of the Year?
In addition, Suu Kyi is a symbol of democracy not only for the people of Burma, but also for the people of the world, especially the oppressed. Her determination and dedication to achieve victory in the struggle for democracy in Burma—which during the 1988 uprising she coined “the second struggle for national independence”—has never swayed, and she has paid a huge price for her efforts. But has she brought any improvement other than hope and inspiration to people's lives this year? And has she come close to bringing democracy to Burma? Unfortunately, the answer to both questions is “no.” So while my respect for Daw Suu Kyi and appreciation for the significance of her release nearly tipped the scales in favor of choosing her as 2010 Person of the Year, I did not do so. Min Ko Naing, the most prominent leader of the 88 Generation Students group, was the next up for consideration. He was a leader of the 1988 uprising, and along with many of his colleagues was sentenced to 65 years in prison for his role in the protests. The sacrifice and dedication that he and his colleagues have demonstrated in their efforts to bring about change in Burma is enormous and noble. But as a prisoner, what did he manage to accomplish in 2010? From his cell in the remote Kengtung Prison in Shan State, he was unable to send his political message or work back to Rangoon. For the year 2010, therefore, he was just on the shortlist. Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, then popped into mind. The 26-year-old was chosen 2010 Person of the Year by Time magazine for his creation of a social network that since 2006 has connected more than a half-billion people across the world. Is there anyone in Burma, I wondered, who has brought together its diverse citizens in a relatively similar fashion? Or do we have a Burmese Julian Assange, one of the Time runners-up, who leaked over 250,000 diplomatic cables through his WikiLeaks website? During Burma's election on Nov. 7, many local journalists disclosed polling irregularities, vote rigging and other instances of election fraud despite heavy restrictions imposed by the regime. The media did a good job, allowing the world to see clearly how the military government manipulated the vote and stole the election. But everyone knew in advance the election was a sham, and I don't think the collective media exposed the “big story” that entitled them to be named Person of the Year. Probably the boldest move of 2010 was taken by Brig-Gen Saw Lah Pwe, the leader of the breakaway Brigade 5 of the Democratic Karen Buddhist Army. On election day, Saw Lah Pwe led his troops in a calculated assault on Myawaddy and Three Pagodas Pass near the Thailand-Burma border, during which they seized some official buildings in Myawaddy. The audacity of the attacks left the Burmese generals, who had previously made a big push to get Brigade 5 to agree to join its border guard force, with a significant amount of egg on their face. It also threatened to instigate an all out war between the regime and the country's many armed ethnic groups. Should the rebel leader Saw Lah Pwe, therefore, be the Person of the Year? I don't think so, because while significant, his calculated assault on the regime was isolated. Before being considered for nationwide recognition, he needs to coordinate with other armed ethnic groups and launch a larger offensive against the junta's armed forces. 1 | 2 COMMENTS (13)
|
Thailand Hotels Bangkok Hotels China Hotels India Hotels |
Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research |
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved. |