ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Aung San Suu Kyi: Burma's National Leader
By AUNG ZAW Sunday, November 14, 2010


COMMENTS (14)
RECOMMEND (376)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Burma's Nobel peace laureate and democratic leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, is free at last. Her release will no doubt raise hopes and expectations. She is not just the leader of her own party, the National League for Democracy; Aung San Suu Kyi is also regarded as the national leader in Burma.

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

In her absence, critics inside and outside of Burma privately or openly questioned her relevance and popularity, suggesting that she no longer represented a majority of Burmese people. They were wrong.

Britain's Rangoon ambassador, Andrew Heyn, has the answer: "As for her relevance, all the evidence points to a regime that still fears that she is very relevant." Burma's oppressed citizens have not forgotten her.

Since the news of her imminent release reached residents in Rangoon, many Burmese, including the younger generations who have never seen her in person, bravely flocked into her party headquarters to show support and walked to her lakeside house, chanting and waiting for her release in spite of the presence of the troops and riot police. The question now is how she will confront challenges and the new political landscape in her country.

The political challenges that Aung San Suu Kyi will face will be very much different from what she encountered during the two previous times she was freed from house arrest, the first in July 1995 and the second in May 2002.

The regime has just held a general election and rigged the votes and will soon claim "victory" with an improbable 80% of the vote. The regime will form a new government and convene parliament. But Aung San Suu Kyi won't be sitting there. So the generals may think they have sidelined her effectively. This calculation could be wrong.

Burma's sullen military leaders have taken a political risk to free the immensely popular democracy leader, but they might have also thought that, since they are in full control of the situation in the country and secured their role in future politics, her freedom was a risk worth taking. However, Aung San Suu Kyi could remain a thorn in the side of the regime.

Despite its views and values, the government of Burma has no shortage of friends around. The Association of South East Asian Nations (Asean) said the election was a "significant step forward". Asean's Vietnamese chair said in a statement published by the Vietnamese state media on Tuesday: "Asean encourages Myanmar [Burma] to continue to accelerate the process of national reconciliation and democratisation for stability and development in the country." China offered full backing to the election.

Aung San Suu Kyi's non-violence struggle also won friends and admirers around the world and she remains a symbol of democratic struggle in Burma. She has been asking her captors to have a meaningful political dialogue, but the past meetings between the regime leaders and Aung San Suu Kyi have reached nowhere. Instead she has been locked in and locked out again and again.

It is believed that Aung San Suu Kyi will continue to call for political dialogue; she will also call for the regime to free more than 2,000 political prisoners who remain behind bars.

More importantly, she will play a pivotal role in reconciling and restoring the unity of ethnic nationalities. Indeed, prior to her release Aung San Suu Kyi was interested in the second Panglong Conference—the first one was held in 1947, a year before the country regained its independence from Britain. At the conference, led by her father, several ethnic leaders formed a united front for independence. Since Aung San Suu Kyi can win the trust of the divided ethnic nationalities in Burma, the second Panglong Conference is as important as the first. The question is whether the regime will allow it to take place.

Aung San Suu Kyi wants to find a way to lift the international economic sanctions and is in favour of international humanitarian aid going into Burma and border regions. However, the question is how the regime will react to her olive branch.

Lastly, her supporters and party members have also expressed great concern for her safety. They know that the regime will remain unfriendly to Aung San Suu Kyi in spite of the release—this is not a gesture of goodwill from the regime, who have cooked up several charges against her in the past to lock her up.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (14)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
19/11/2010
Ko Ye is absolutely right.The woman just exploited the ignorance of our very sad people, who are intellectually very, very poor first of all because of colonialism, next Panglongism, next BSPP lunatic way to socialism/ruination of Burma, coupled with repressions, witch hunts, tortures, murders, and ultimately the ignorance of the rulers.
3. Sanction-imposing countries will want pounds of political flesh beofre lifting santions;the woman is so deluded that she can swing a deal. No way mate! We know world politics better than the lot of you put together.(We are receiving real education from our king HM King Schwebomin II). Despite her release, there is no quid pro quo; no reciprocal gesture from the sanction-imposing countries. What they want is to humiliate the 'state' of Burma.

Ko Ye Wrote:
17/11/2010
What did Aung San Suu Kyi do for Burma? As 16-year-old youth, I honestly really don't know what she did for Burma. It does not mean that all older Burmese people know more than us.

kerry Wrote:
17/11/2010
Myanmar Patriots, cowards and lackeys that you are, for once speak up for human lives.

IRRELEVENT? Are you kidding?

Blah, blah, blah... sad, irrelevent, unable to spoil the joy of the world, and like another brutal 'master', we are all over you.

PB Publico Wrote:
17/11/2010
In 1947, it was the enlightened British govt that encouraged and respected the Panglong Agreement, signed between the ethnic leaders and U Aung San. The British did not supervise the conference, let alone manipulate it.

Now we aspire for Panglong 2. We can only hope that the regime is now enlightened and wise enough to allow it to take place. They will be a partner to the conference, and have a say. Daw Suu (the Burman majority) and the ethnic leaders are the other two partners, each having an equal say, and not to be coerced. The three partners must thrash out an agreement that suits them all. No one is above anybody.

Would the junta leaders, if not the one Supremo, understand such reconciliation in unison and have a mind as big and honorable as the Attlee government? Would they understand such noble behavior as magnanimity of the mighty and the victorious?

I sincerely hope so. After all, they are proud, brave soldiers. They should certainly participate and strive for it.

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
16/11/2010
She changes tact just to stay in the (boxing) ring. But no one is boxing her. She is boxing thin air. The Tatmataw and Sen.Gen Than Shwe, you stay on course. That is our command to you.
Be noble. We can advise you on how to achieve economic progress. The Brtish embassador is only a flea in the scheme of things.
BRAVE HEART is the greatest!

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
16/11/2010
No, she is no leader! She is just a puppet of England.
IRRAWADDY, you have an ethical journalistic duty to tell the truth.

Than Lwin Wrote:
16/11/2010
No leader in the whole world represents his/her people more legitimately than Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. We, the whole of Burma, voted her to be our leader 20 years ago despite being at the junta's gunpoint.

ludu Wrote:
15/11/2010
As I have believe, she is the only answer for the current Burma crisis. What I am only concerned for is her safety. I don't want her to be a martyr instead of future leader of ALL BURMA. We can't trust the monk, student and ethnic people killers and rapists, THE JUNTA......

Tettoe Aung Wrote:
15/11/2010
Daw Suu has changed the meaning of 'leader' and 'leadership'. She leads by example and like her father she has made and is always willing to make huge sacrifices. Her meaning of life is very different from the generals (who are supposed to be the ones who make sacrifices for the people and the country). They were given privileges that no other public servant could dream of. In spite of all that, they can't satisfy their insatiable greed. What kind of wealth did the founding father of the Tatmadaw Bogyoke Aung San left when he was assassinated? He gave his life to the people and his country. Than Shwe should not be afraid of Daw Suu but he should be afraid of those who he has harmed in his own Tatmadaw. They are the ones who have arms and who have access. If not them, then the ICC will.

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
15/11/2010
Change of tact,eh?Where is the principle? She has no principle. 1.She called Tamataw fascist. 2.She usurped her brother who is a true Myanmar patriot. 3. She occupies the house that belongs to both of them. 3. She invited sanctions;many Burmese, ordinary workers lost their jobs. 5. She urged Western tourists not visit Burma; taxi drivers and the likes lost opportunity earn a living.

These will haunt you, Mrs. Aris. Besides, the West, particular UK and US never give aid without strings attached. This is not Marshall aid. Germany was rebuilt by the US as a frontier against USSR, not for the love of Germans.

Come on stop dreaming. Get real.
There will be no change.
Change can only come with economic progress.That needs brains. Sadly, our people are so uneducated they cannot appreciate who has brains. So they get very easily manipulated by the media.

In short SuuKyi, Mrs Michael Aris, Oxford housewife is totally irrelevant.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
15/11/2010
Britain's Rangoon ambassador, Andrew Heyn, has the answer: "As for her relevance, all the evidence points to a regime that still fears that she is very relevant."

Look at the crowd now, not to mention the global community rallying behind her and showing support as well. Than Shwe should add Andrew Heyn among his astrologers ASAP.

Of course Burma's oppressed citizens and the world at large have not forgotten her as evidenced. Hence, Aung San Suu Kyi is Burma's National Leader and the World's Political Icon as well.

Than Shwe must be SHIVERING in his boots now.
It is time Than Shwe comes to terms with the fact that sidelining people and rigging elections holds no water. And it is PAYBACK TIME now.

Second Panglong Conference in the offing would certainly NAIL his COFFIN for GOOD no doubt.
And when she PUSHES for release of all political prisoners and dialogue including ethnic leaders I fear the CURTAIN will COME DOWN again.

pyesone Wrote:
15/11/2010
I would prefer good business investments from global players like the G20 that would create job opportunities for Burmese people. That will be a lot better than aid.

Erik Wrote:
15/11/2010
I wonder why people idolize ASSK so much. Her call for sanctions didn't work. Her non violent approach didn't work as it didn't bring the generals to the bargaining table. She can invoke the memory of her father and Ghandi, but they were both backed by military forces, so the comparison is wrong.

The regime played the ASSK-card to deflect election criticism. "National leader" Aung San Suu Kyi hasn't lead anything yet and will be back behind bars if she gets too popular soon. And as she and her party are not involved in the modest evolution that will take place, she is politically quite irrelevant.

I know the people of Burma are afraid to demonstrate, strike or rise up again. But putting all their hope in the hands of one person who, due to here very restricted position and the lack of an efficient party with a program and a strategy, will not be able to get even a fraction of the result Burma's peoples dream of...

Wake up: it's not about Aung San Suu Kyi.

Soe Thane Wrote:
14/11/2010
Editorial says: ASSK is "in favour of international humanitarian aid going into Burma and border regions. However, the question is how the regime will react to her olive branch"

This is not really an olive branch. The regime doesn't want humanitarian aid. It doesn't care about humanitarian conditions. And it doesn't want international aid workers in Burma.

Many are also happy with sanctions. No sanctions mean they have to accept blame the for the economy.

She should call for more aid because it helps the people. It's not an olive branch for the regime. They might not even accept more aid.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.