ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Webb's Mission a Lost Cause?
By AUNG ZAW Friday, June 11, 2010


COMMENTS (9)
RECOMMEND (409)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 2)

Webb must also contend with skepticism from Burma's democracy movement, both inside and outside the country.

In a commentary published by The Irrawaddy following Webb's first visit to Burma last August, U Pyinya Zawta, a Buddhist monk who played a leading role in the 2007 Saffron Revolution, criticized the senator's “ignorance of the situation in my country,” citing a passage in his book, “A Time to Fight,”
in which he appeared to dismiss the importance of this mass uprising against military rule.

“If Westerners had remained in the country this moment might never have occurred, because it is entirely possible that conditions may have improved rather than deteriorated,” Webb wrote in his book.

Like many Burmese democracy activists, U Pyinya Zawta took issue with Webb's assumption that a Western presence in Burma would somehow deliver the country from the worst effects of military rule.

But while Webb seems to regard the efforts of Burma's own people to liberate themselves from their brutal rulers as an exercise in futility, he may now be learning that his own quixotic mission to save the country from itself is falling victim to the lies and intransigence of a regime that can't be trusted.



  1  |  2  | 



COMMENTS (9)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
15/06/2010
"The American will invade Burma in future and the only alternative is if one alliance of hill tribes capture the country first."

Hmm. Typical westerner fantasy.

A country with 50 million people as hostages and you will blow up the country or get some one to help you from within?

Have any sense?

You will have at least recognize the "enduring animosity" which simply translate to "tenacity", a "character" the people that you nonchalantly wish to destroy possess.
Yet here we are.

Peter Ole Kvint talked about invading Myanmar with or without the help of "hill tribes".

Will you care to define "hill tribes," Peter Ole Kvint?

Just a few from 100+ groups that fit your derogatory description. Are you referring to the Miong, the Akha or Karen? Please do clarify.

I belong to one of the hill tribes that you mentioned.

Incidentally, Peter O, you are not a "Pa-O".
Otherwise you wouldn't have said what you did.

Garrett Wrote:
14/06/2010

So far, it looks like Webb has only made the generals smile by wasting valuable time at a critical period in Burmese history, when the citizens need to be focused on the SPDC plans to legitimize their bastard regime spawned by overturning their 1990 defeat.

This time they will simply not allow defeat of THEIR candidates to be an option.

As for what will happen in the future, look to the past Burmese dictators, each a greedy mutant of brutality WORSE than their predecessors.

Whatever happens in this election, the citizens will suffer worse poverty, less freedom, and more corruption.

The regime will give them its SPDC faux democracy,& make sure it is such a disaster that by the time the military stages the next coup d'état, the citizens will be thankful.

That is probably when they plan to coronate King Than Shwe-bomin II.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
13/06/2010
Peter Ole Kvint Wrote: 12/06/2010

But that was a hard work to cut them down, American or hill tribes. The American will invade Burma in future and the only alternative is if one alliance of hill tribes capture the country first. Then the Chinese seen as the have need of a Burma policy. But Jim Webb does not like the hill tribes, because they are like the Red Indian. A cowboy does not like to see the "Native American" win. And that in a alliance by Red Communistic Chinese.
WOW! What a brilliant brain, what an analysis.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
13/06/2010
Don't engage!

Tide Wrote:
12/06/2010
Aung Zaw - don't try to manipulate news, particularly this one. What makes you think people can't get the correct news? Or perhaps your agency is based on rumors. See the link below.

http://webb.senate.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/2010-06-08-01.cfm

Peter Ole Kvint Wrote:
12/06/2010
We Westerners had several dictatorships, and they fell. But that was a hard work to cut them down, and all democratic neighbour countries worked for that. China have any foreign policy; Bangladesh no and Thailand no. India support the dictatorship, but half-heartedly. First then a chief give the Chinese that choice: American or hill tribes. The American will invade Burma in future and the only alternative is if one alliance of hill tribes capture the country first. Then the Chinese seen as the have need of a Burma policy. But Jim Webb does not like the hill tribes, because they are like the Red Indian. A cowboy does not like to see the "Native American" win. And that in a alliance by Red Communistic Chinese.

Tettoe Aung Wrote:
12/06/2010
In Burmese we have a saying, "The beginning must have to be good to achieve a good ending" (asa kaung-hma anaung thei-cha-myi).

All is well that ends well, isn't it? Has he realized that Westerners have remained in our country long after Ne Win's coup in 1962? Not only have they remained but poured in aid in billions only to make the military regime stronger with changes of constitutions and clothes but nothing has changed in the dire situation of the people.

Can I ask Senator Webb, where was he then? We should not put up with hypocrites. No wonder Daw Suu said you have to be honest to have political integrity!

plan B Wrote:
12/06/2010
Ko Aung Zaw has failed to explain in depth the logic behind his reasoning.

Presence of any west influence might have made a difference?

If he quotes Pyinnya Zawta to negate Webb, he then must believe Than Shwe/SPDC must be the only cause.

Only by removal which Irrawaddy staunchly advocated continually, and the ascent of NLD/Daw Aung San Suu Kyi will the difference made!

Now negating a west involvement assumption yet assuming the other as viable seem hypocritical.

Then again Irrawaddy helped contribute to the opposing SPDC at any cause instead of purely advocating for the citizenry of Myanmar.

Therefore Ko Aung Zaw must fess up to the consequences of the advocacy Irrawaddy has chosen instead of white washing with this present article.

From now on "Pure advocacy for the plight of the people" within the Soros' creed will be commendable.

[Editor's note: Please write names in full. In future, comments that refer to "UPZ", "SGTS" and "DASSK" will be deleted.]

Venus Wrote:
11/06/2010
Yawning with distractions in all engagement. Myanmar citizens as infant babies, bitten by mosquitoes at home, are rescued by hammering the mosquitoes on babies forehead.

Washington knows that China's been dominating and exploiting on all fronts, whereas a regime leader’s nuclear ambitions has been long, not just come up. Washington should have been in strategic engagement in military to military level, diplomatically, instead of sanctions and double-standard. In the art of states, military frontier and democracy frontier should be explicitly drawn the line. So as to hard military security and soft human security of economic, health, social.

All in all, Eric John’s decline, State Department’s slowness in Myanmar issues , Webb’s dilemma to encounter with regime & pressure-groups, Washington as world’s police should find tactful means of engagement on military front. Time is ripe to recall 1929 as we all seem to be in the era of Cyber Great Depression Info Age.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.