ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Time to Dig In
By YENI Tuesday, April 27, 2010


COMMENTS (7)
RECOMMEND (444)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

The recent rejection of the Burmese regime's Border Guard Force (BGF) plan by up to a dozen armed ethnic groups exposes the cease-fire agreements as increasingly unsustainable. The grim prospect of conflict looms on Burma's horizon yet again.

According to ethnic sources, all the top-ranking leaders of the cease-fire groups and their delegations were defiant following their talks with Naypyidaw's negotiator, Lt-Gen Ye Myint, whose arrogant conduct and acrimonious remarks scuttled what little amity had previously existed at the respective negotiating tables.

Yeni is news editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

Chief of Military Affairs Security Ye Myint reportedly threatened the ethnic leaders with legal action if they failed to sign up for the BGF plan by April 22, which was interpreted to mean that they would be declared unlawful organizations by the military government.

In southern Shan State, fears of a conflict have increased since the cease-fire deadline passed last week for the largest of Burma's armed ethnic groups, the United Wa State Army (UWSA), which has upward of 20,000 troops. According to local sources, the Burmese military has deployed tanks and artillery in Mongton, Mong Saik and Tachilek townships in preparation for war. Many local villagers are making preparations to evacuate their homes and move temporarily to the Thai side of the border to avoid any bloodshed.

Meanwhile, some 400 Mon people from resettlement sites located close to a New Mon State Party (NMSP) military base have fled their homes to avoid a potential conflict between the Burmese army and the NMSP, following a breakdown in talks. They arrived a few days ago at the Hlokhani Mon refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border. 

Last year's siege of the Kokang headquarters by the Burmese army has set an alarming precedent. Some 37,000 Kokang and Chinese refugees fled their homes and took refuge on the Chinese side of the border after government forces overran the Kokang stronghold of Laogai in August.

Similarly, between three and four thousand Karen villagers fled to Thailand when conflict broke out in Karen State between a joint force of Burmese-DKBA troops and the rebel Karen National Liberation Army.

Now, with the scent of war in the air again, many innocent civilians—who all too often get caught in the crossfire—are packing their bags in advance.

The junta’s move to transform the troops of the cease-fire groups into BGFs before the upcoming  election is believed to be in accordance with the constitutional provision that the “Union of Myanmar” have only one army. But their demands have largely been met with resistance from the ethnic groups who say they have nothing to gain from a BGF unit under Burmese regional command. Several ethnic leaders have also said that they don't have any faith in the new Constitution, which was passed through a farcical referendum in 2008.

In fact, the BGF issue must be frustrating the generals in Naypyidaw as the plan has failed to bear fruit. Instead, suspicion between the military government and the ethnic groups has increased. Moreover, in response to the crisis, Beijing, the Burmese generals' stanchest ally, has made repeated calls for stability on the border and for guarantees for the safety of Chinese people in Burma.

Frustration is undoubtedly a sentiment felt by detained democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and her party, the National League for Democracy. They have decided to boycott the 2010 election as a response to the regime's unjust election laws, which were drafted to prevent Suu Kyi and other political prisoners from participating in the election or even remaining as members of their respective parties.

The NLD position is based on its Shwegondaing Declaration, released in April last year, which calls for a review of the controversial constitution, political dialogue and the unconditional release of all political prisoners.

However,  instead of showing the world that they truly wish to move toward a legitimate government and gain international recognition, the military regime, led by Snr-Gen Than Shwe, has firmly responded that there will be no review of the Constitution, and that this year's election will go ahead with or without the opposition.

Faced with being disbanded after the election deadline on May 6, and fearing that their offices will be raided and their leaders arrested, the NLD and its political allies are preparing for the worst.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (7)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
02/05/2010
1.Than Shwe has no cause or concern for victory over the UWSA and Shan drug runners since day one. UTTER RUBBISH!
2.However, he has to look beyond the borders as well where there is a very possible and present danger of Chinese hordes pouring into Burma like in the 1950-53 Korean War in the wake of the UWSA and Shan debacle.
3. Of course the UNSC would intervene and Wa and probably Shan territories would go under China's jurisdiction like Korea divided at the 38th parallel.
Burma is a sovereign state! Divided nations are being united. eg. Germany. The Cold War is over. CYPRUS is a colonial legacy. KOREA must unite.
4.The monk murderer's position is certainly WEAK and UNTENABLE at this juncture also. BOGUS MONKS getting violent are not Buddhism. FACT is the troops begged the monks to return to monasteries, but the latter provoked! The government has a duty to stop further violence. Look at Thailand!

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
30/04/2010
Than Shwe has no cause or concern for victory over UWSA and Shan drug runners since day one.
However, he has to look beyond the borders as well where there is a very possible and present danger of Chinese hordes pouring into Burma like in 1950-53 Korean War in the wake of UWSA and Shan debacle.
Of course UNSC would intervene and Wa and probably Shan territories would go under China's jurisdiction like Korea divided at 38th parallel.
Hence Than Shwe is in a LOSE-LOSE situation no doubt.
The monk murderer's position is certainly WEAK and UNTENABLE at this juncture also.
His half a million men army could not stem the Chinese tide of course and lack of support of his own people much less international community as well would not HELP the monk murderer as well.
The mass murderer should THINK HARD before he puts his wrong foot out and considers the dire consequences in this matter.
However, he has a SLIM CHANCE in his favor in case he plays the game right as he has the cards in hand also.

hamaryut Wrote:
29/04/2010
Ethnic armed group don't have to transform their army to participate in election. Ethnic army is not for election. It is for protecting and for defending their ethnic people. As long as their is no political system or institituion to protect their people, they should never give up their arms. If someone would like participate in election, they can resign from the group and join the election. Army is backone of your revolution. In current situation, there is no rule of law that will protect your people. Only your army can protect your people. If the SPDC, the largest world terrorist group use force, you have to respond by force. Build your army whenever you have a chance and try to balance power of SPDC army.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
29/04/2010
How very tragic for Burma that a handful of unelected people took up arms against the state of Burma rather than help develop democracy but using the ballot box.
How very tragic that some of our people think that democracy is disintegration according to Panglong. And they simply fail to appreciate that Burma is a sovereign state and the sovereign power is to be in the hands of the collective including all elected representatives.
How very tragic... And all the army generals shall follow their mentor (Gen Ne Win)'s famous motto- "We guys shoot to kill, nothing else". There was no such mass murder since 1988. Our claimant in exile to the throne of Burma Shwebomin II specifically commanded that the shoot¨to kill policy must be discarded.ONLY USE TEARGAS AND RUBBER BULLET IF NECESSARY. Now how many people have been killed in Thailand? Does it make the Thai government murderers. and can riots go on forever, and should the government do nothing.

Andrew Wrote:
29/04/2010
This is a good review of the current tense situation in Burma and the confrontation occuring between the SPDC and the ethnic groups. If left unchecked by the international community, a blood bath will likely result. A concerted international effort lead by China, the EU, and the USA to prevent this is required; but I do not see that developing in force yet. The Burmese generals must understand that moving against the ethnic communities and their own people will lead to further international condemnation. The question is do they care enough about that and its impact to cease and desist from their threatened actions against the Karen, Shan, Chin, Kachin and others?

A.M.O Wrote:
28/04/2010
Well, the baton had been passed down from one army general to another (Ne Win to Saw Maung to Than Shwe); with a clear message that - "We guys are changing only 'the bottles, not the wine'".

In his attempt to pass on the baton to another army general in 2010, Gen Than Shwe is so adamant that he didn't know he is 'repeating the same history' of Gen Ne Win, which will lead him to that of Gen Ne Win's ungracious end in '88.

And all the army generals shall follow their mentor (Gen Ne Win)'s famous motto-
"We guys shoot to kill, nothing else".

People can see clearly that a blood-bath is in the making & naturally they had to dig in for the worst to come.

To paint the picture in a worst case scenario shall be - a repeat history of '88, in a situation like Pol Pot's Cambodia(few millions killed).

(NB: Cambodia is a Buddhist society as well; where killing is the worst offense)

Zam Mang Wrote:
28/04/2010
It must be give and take. The way SPDC is handling the ethnic armed groups seems forced and one-way. When we all can come together and sit around one table, we all can discussed how we see things. We can have give and take from each other. The Union will be peaceful and prosperous again. What we want is not domination by one group but exchange whatever we have between different groups. Difference will still exist but guns and bullets will not be the answer there but understanding and love will be there. Are we separatists? No. What we want is genuine democracy, not Than Shwe's way of disciplined flourishing democracy which is far from the real one. BGF program is not what we have been asking for. Gold nor silver neither. What we want is just a genuine Democracy.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.