ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
The Next Big Step
By KYAW ZWA MOE Wednesday, November 11, 2009


COMMENTS (11)
RECOMMEND (405)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 2)

According to sources close to the generals, Than Shwe’s reaction to Suu Kyi’s overtures has been “so far, so good.” But this could suddenly change, and the current situation could deteriorate rapidly, depending on the mood of the man who holds absolute power over Burma.

Knowing this, Suu Kyi has proceeded carefully. But as the leader of Burma’s pro-democracy forces, sooner or later she will have to raise sensitive issues like the election and the Constitution.

For its part, the Obama administration has also moved forward cautiously in its talks with the regime. It said it would not push for a review of the Constitution, saying that this should be discussed as part of a “national dialogue.” 

Although Than Shwe appears to have relaxed his guard somewhat, it is important not to underestimate his capacity for manipulation.

It seems fairly obvious what he wants—the removal of sanctions and acceptance of the outcome of next year’s election by the international community. But so far he has offered nothing of substance in return.

This suggests that his goals may not be as ambitious as they seem. Perhaps he is merely trying to reduce the pressure on his regime to tolerable levels so he can extend his hold on power a little longer. In other words, he may just be up to his old tricks, in which case, we can expect to see Suu Kyi remain under house arrest until after the election.

On the other hand, if he is genuinely interested in ensuring a safe exit for himself, he may take the risk of releasing Suu Kyi, although only after he has sufficient guarantees from her that she will not do anything to undermine his election plans. Indeed, if he really does want the election to be regarded as anything other than a sham, he will have no choice but to free Suu Kyi.

In any case, the situation is very delicate. Three key actors—Than Shwe, Suu Kyi and the US—realize this, and have played their hands very carefully. But at some point, someone will have to make a more daring move, and when this happens, it could be a game changer, or it could just force the situation back to square one.



  1  |  2  | 



COMMENTS (11)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Garrett Wrote:
25/11/2009
The SPDC seldom misses an opportunity to kill more than one bird with the same stone. Arranging to make DASSK a wedge between the urban majority and the rural ethnic minorites will serve them better than allowing her to become a bridge to unite all Burmese people.
Daw Suu is certainly important as a leader, but her freedom and leadership will mean nothing without freeing all Burmese citizens from persecution, corruption, and fear.

The majority of the money paid to army commanders, government officials and even teachers comes from extortion and corruption.
The massive Burma army is fed on the rice that is confiscated from the poorest ethnic citizens, who must watch as their families starve.
What provision is there in the SPDC constitution for the millions of ethnic citizens who bear the burden of the SPDC regime yoke?
Without true democracy and freedom, ethnic persecution and urban poverty will continue regardless of who wears the title of "Leader".
It is part of the SPDC plan.

Moe Aung Wrote:
23/11/2009
Than Shwe is definitely going through the motions as with all 'peace parleys' the military initiated until the last round of ceasefire agreements that benefited only the leaders on both sides of the table. There will likely be tangible results again benefiting the elites and not necessarily the people.

What exactly does plan B expect the US or TS to do? The former to appease and the latter graciously accept because he's in pole position? Because TS is going from strength to strength despite the sanctions, they must be lifted never mind the dire state of the country ruled by jungle law? Is give and take no longer the basis of negotiations?

plan B Wrote:
19/11/2009
Ko Kyaw Zwa Moe must be applauded for his sequential listing of fast occurring events as well as some significances.
However as a Burmese who knows the psyche well he should point out more strongly that Burmese most probably think Than Shwe is doing fine as it is despite the West's opinion. As if his planned visit to Sri Lanka did not say it loud enough.
Surely the west should not expect much out of Than Shwe in responding to this empty "let's talk" nonsense.
After all, Than Shwe knows well he has survived 2 decades of the West's useless, careless threats, emerging stronger than ever.
If as suggested "at some point, someone will have to make a more daring move,"
the West must realize that Than Shwe will not be the first to effect that quality.
The sooner the West realize that fact the faster a "daring" plan can be formulated.
A plan that consist of either an offer Than Shwe cannot refuse or coupled with a consequence of refusal that will make last the last two decades a walk in the park for the refuser.

Steven Baldesco Wrote:
13/11/2009
Very good article; I applaud the Irrawaddy.

It's great that the US is taking careful steps to persuade the junta to begin the so-called "dialogue" between them and the democracy movement (which is, of course, led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi), but if the steps are VERY, VERY slow, then what's the use if we'll just allow them to do their dirty work while talking to them about democracy, and staring at them feeling proud of themselves, as if they have ultimately won the game?

Moreover, it's as if the junta is taking part in two games at the same time; one is the diplomatic discussions between them and the US; and the other one is trying to legitimize their sham 2010 polls and their continued harassment of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.

But, like what Ngal Hriang has written, only the one above (no matter what faith it is) knows what the man in the green uniform will do next.

Myo Chit Wrote:
13/11/2009
Look out for the trump card. The Burmese political scenario of the moment seems to be gradually moving towards a hopeful turn. But knowing the track record of our psycho-warfare specialist junta chief, all unexpeceted things should be in due consideration. Let's say hopefully - DASSK and all political prisoners are released, and what if the election law, soon to be released, says "an election candidate should be free from criminal record."

This is a common requirement in election laws all over the world. It is a bona fide point in law. Please remember - all our political prisoners, including DASSK, have been convicted under criminal prosecution for breaking the junta's illegal laws, petty or serious, never mind. Then, they become automatically disqualified for contest in the 2010 election.

So, the dialogue in reconciliation should contain "to revoke criminal offense charges" on all political prisoners. It could be the chief's trump card, a vital blow to all oppositions.

Bob Wrote:
12/11/2009
I don't believe Obama will mention DASSK by Name in Singapore on Sunday. It is not important whether she will be released or not. The US will do business with the junta even if she is not free. Obama needs just to show his regret for her. He is not interested in freedom and democracy in Burma, but in natural resources and the power over Southeast Asia. Ms Clinton said "America is back to Asia". For what? In order to fight against China? Suu Kyi might be released, but she would not be allowed to make a speech on political issues. I think that would be a condition for her release. She could passively observe the election campaign. But the results are evident. The junta will hold on to the power. In politics there would be no change. But in economics the US would be present everywhere in Burma. US and Europe would exploit Burma. The Burmese people would lose all that they possess now. Only elite businessmen would profit. Burma would be corrupter than it is.

Ngal Hriang Wrote:
12/11/2009
Since Than Shwe is insane, it is very difficult to predict what he will do next. At the same time, he is not decision-maker. His soothsayer is the one who makes decisions. When a person is mentally insane, only God knows what madman will do next.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
12/11/2009
Than Shwe will take no further steps much less in the direction of democratizing Burma other than his penultimate step (holding his farcical 2010 elections)in his seven step road map designed for eternal military rule of Burma.

Daw Suu will not bend or bow to anyone if it is not in the interest of her people and country, trust me.

The NLD should follow her lead and honor her sacrifice by showing solidarity with her and the people she represents.

US must stick to its guns and upholding sanctions while demanding the release of Daw Suu and an all inclusive political process.

However, US should take note that freedom only for Daw Suu and her people without rights to exercise their political beliefs and others is rather hollow and meaningless.

James O'Brien Wrote:
11/11/2009
I could not agree more with Kyaw Zwa Moe.

The junta thinks after the "election" and they have "legitimized" themselves, everything will be hunky dory and they will be home safe.

That is not the case. The Burma problem will continue simmering with more and more severe flare ups.

Only time will tell which way the junta and the senior general will really exit.

But exit they must, sooner or later and they should see that they'd better have real changes or the outcome will not be pretty, as the Burmese like to say.

James O'Brien

timothy Wrote:
11/11/2009
It is wishful thinking for all of us that Than Shwe would release Daw Suu soon. The same is true for Than Shwe if he thinks he could retire peacefully when he hands over power to the new breed of military dictators.

He should not forget the faith of late Gen. Ne Win.

Even if Than Shwe retires peacefully, which is almost impossible in a dictatorship system, he will go to lowest level of hell to join Ne Win.

He lost his Buddhist faith after killing monks.

Than shwe must release Daw Suu and all prisoners in exchange for security for him and his family. He should go into a Buddhist monk-hood to clean his sins.

plan B Wrote:
11/11/2009
Ko Kyaw Zwa Moe
A good commentary everyone should read b/f jumping in to contribute.

As the lady has taken charge of this situation with the utmost care, the SPDC has very little choice.
What is important is:

What was said behind closed doors during Campbell meeting with DASSK.

What did the US convey to #1 and #2.

SPDC might think it has the upper hand, and the US might think it can still play uncle Robinson.
As it is the US is not winning any points grand standing.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.