ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
The Facts Remain the Same
By YENI Thursday, November 5, 2009


COMMENTS (9)
RECOMMEND (458)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

A two-day “fact-finding” mission to Burma led by US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell wrapped up yesterday after meetings with junta officials including Prime Minister Gen Thein Sein, opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and ethnic leaders.

Describing his visit as an “exploratory mission,” Campbell told reporters shortly before leaving the country that he had a chance to explain to Burmese officials the aims of the new US policy of “direct engagement,” which are “strong support for human rights, the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and all other political prisoners and the promotion of democratic reform.”

Campbell and his deputy, Scot Marciel, are the highest-ranking American officials to visit Burma since 1995, when former US Congressman Bill Richardson and then US Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright traveled to the country in a bid to push for democratic reforms.

During his trip to Burma, Richardson met with Suu Kyi at her lakeside home, where she had been detained since 1989, bringing with him a letter from President Bill Clinton. He also held talks with intelligence chief Lt-Gen Khin Nyunt, who was also Secretary 1 of the State Law and Order Restoration Council (Slorc), as the junta then called itself.

At a press conference in Bangkok after his visit, Richardson concluded that these two people—Suu Kyi and Khin Nyunt—would decide the future of Burma. Ironically, both are now confined to their own homes as prisoners of the ruling generals.

Albright also made a number of strong statements following her trip to Burma. Regarding her meeting with Suu Kyi, she said, “I have never been as impressed with another human being.” But she was less complimentary about the Slorc, calling it “an ugly acronym for an ugly government.”

This time, the new Democratic administration in Washington is taking greater care not to unnecessarily offend the Burmese generals. But at the same time, it is heeding Suu Kyi’s calls to engage not only the regime, but also the opposition and ethnic groups, as well as other individuals and groups inside and outside the country.

For Burmese who have long doubted the effectiveness of past US grandstanding, this is a welcome change. But it still remains to be seen if it will yield any substantive results.

The signs so far are not encouraging. Less than a week before Campbell arrived in Burma, the junta arrested 41 people, including journalists, political activists and students, in a security crackdown in Rangoon. Some of them are members of “Lin Lat Kyei,” a group that is involved in relief efforts for survivors of last year’s Cyclone Nargis, which killed nearly 140,000 people. No explanation has been given for their arrest, and there has been no word on where they are being held.
 
Usually on such occasions, the US State Department would release a press statement expressing concern about these unlawful arrests. This time, however, the White House chose to remain silent, perhaps hoping to pave the way for a successful Campbell visit. If so, it is sending a confusing signal, suggesting that the new US approach lacks a sense of urgency—an impression that was reinforced when Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Marciel responded to a question about the arrests by saying, “We are prepared for setbacks.”

Since a visit to Naypyidaw in August by Sen. Jim Webb—whose main concern is China’s growing influence in Asia—the Obama administration has hurriedly backed away from the policies of former President Bush, who favored isolating the Burmese regime. At the same time, however, it has indicated that it would not lift sanctions before the regime has demonstrated a willingness to make meaningful concessions.
 
At this stage, however, it is clear that the regime is merely adjusting its strategy for holding onto power, playing along with the new US approach in the hope that it will help to offset China’s growing influence, which has been key to the junta’s survival for the past 20 years.

Sadly, while Washington fine tunes its approach to Burma and Naypyidaw figures out how best to use the new diplomatic situation to its own advantage, a number of depressing facts remain unchanged: Suu Kyi is still under detention; some 2,100 political prisoners still languish in their dark cells; ethnic refugees continue to wait for the day when they can return to their homes; and clouds of fear still gather over every citizen of Burma.



COMMENTS (9)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
17/11/2009
Obama stated these following necessary conditions:
1)Release of all political prisoners.
2)End conflict with minority groups.
3)Genuine dialogue between the SPDC and opposition.
4)Genuine dialogue between the SPDC and the minority.
Yeni was right—nothing has changed. It's still SOS with "let's talk" and "engagement" as a header.


Tom Tun Wrote:
11/11/2009
Burmese People,

First of all, shame on you using the name "Burmese People".

Your opinion is not logical at all. Here is why. Do you know why the White House is criticizing Fox News? Do you think that the US has the power to control all media? If US could control everything in this world and wanted to control everything, your Burmese regime would not even exist.

You also criticize federalism. What do you know about federalism? If you know federalism, please share with us why that system does not suit Burma? The US is federal country, as is Canada. Both of these countries have diverse cultures like Burma. The only difference is they have no internal conflicts like Burma. Don't just say federalism is dangerous for Burma, prove it.

I believe Burma is not peaceful because people like you are against logical truth.

plan B Wrote:
10/11/2009
Burmese People,

I used to have that feeling about the Irrawaddy, especially early on. Usually when my words used are overly passionate and can be hurtful to the dignity of people other than the SPDC.

Yes, the Irrawaddy is not impartial; why should it be? It was created to be anti-SPDC.
In that process it does bring out tons of anti-SPDC sentiment. A good outlet, as some see it.

Letting people like you and me as well as articles by Steinberg, Tonkin also exposed other to views that might solidify their closed minds or open them for unique changes in the future.

If nothing else, this encourages the silent readers who are scared away by "muckrakers" that there are similar opinions out there that validate their quiet work to serve Myanmar through personal effort.

The Irrawaddy has been accused of being anti-SPDC. This is the first I heard of it being pro-US.

Again my question is, would you rather be doing the thankless task of the Irrawaddy?
Everybody feels censored, so the Irrawaddy must be doing the right things most of the time!

Burmese People Wrote:
10/11/2009
You are supposed to be impartial. But you censor the views and opinions that do not fit in your mindset, thus depriving Burmese people of the opportunity to develop general intelligence, keeping them intellectually at the level of the flea on overripe fruit.

Media like yours must be regulated. You promote federalism without considering the danger of balkanisation; you have no capacity to analyze anything because your thinking is trapped.

Now Burma has collectively submitted to New Rome. What exactly is the American interest in Burma? Pizza, burger and fried chicken joints owned by American capital and exploiting Burma's natural resources in the name of democracy and human rights? Media and banking will also be controlled by the US. Does the US do anything for the love of any country?

The English colonizers left behind the time bomb of Panglong. Stupid Burmese are cuddling it; now they have asked the US to pull the pin out. When you are overcome by hatred of the military, you become obsessed.

Tamlasay Wrote:
08/11/2009
I am a Karen from Burma. During Campbell's two days visit they met with the opposition and ethnic leaders. But the Karen representatives they met with are not representing the majority of the Karen people inside and outside of Burma.

plan B Wrote:
07/11/2009
kolorama
What is your stake in Myanmar beyond how you portrait in your post?
Any friend in prison?
If so you won't be saying such to make him linger longer.
Any relatives in the villages that depend on trickle down economic activity?
If so you will not want to prolong this present policy that is going nowhere.
Any acquaintances that can not escape the tyranny?
Wait till your jeering makes the SPDC N Korea like.
Any one who needs basic medical care?
They will be dying soon, so drink up.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
07/11/2009
Than Shwe has decided not to play 'threesome', as evidenced by giving the Reds next door the green light to lay their pipelines and arrest more activists while Campbell was chasing wild goose in town - seeing people, most notably ethnic guys, happy like Jesus himself is visiting them in front of Campbell and his sidekick.

This is Than Shwe's one way of torturing people—giving them something to ponder or dream upon.
They will soon wake up to the reality and suffer more.
Than Shwe has opted to cement further ties with Beijing in case guys from Washington DC and others are still not getting the message yet.
The engagement is off as far as the monk murderer is concerned since Campbell spelled out his policy on Burma and insisted on putting lifting sanctions on hold until further notice, no doubt.
Than Shwe wants sanctions lifted only in return for US investment to fatten his wallet.
He lets US guys meet with others just to see who says what and what is in their mind.

Tom Tun Wrote:
06/11/2009
The conditions that Burma is facing today can not be solved by Obama administration solutions. Maybe the Obama administration does not even have a stratagy yet for Burma.

The US is under extreme pressure of deficit and war. Burma is last on the "to do" list in the US mind.

In political idealogy, it is very important to consider stoicism. If a system is research from 3 corners: physical, logical and moral grounds, it is call stoicism.

(1) Physical check; Does the Burmese constitution physically show the sign of turning toward Democracy?

(2) Logical check: The Constitution approves a military role more than a civilian one. The regime said Burmese democracy is nearly complete. But, more and more politicians are behind bars. Is this logical?

(3) Democracy based on freedom of speech. If freedom of speech is violated every time, how can Burma democracy stand up for moral test?

If Obama's administration does not consider stoicism to fix Burma or the world, it will end up empty and getting nowhere.

kolorama Wrote:
05/11/2009
Hear! Hear!

In any case, the facts are all out there already. See CIA Fact Book on Burma online, Irrawaddy, etc.

The SAIS DC seminar last Friday was yucky. "Let's all dance the engagement dance, now the tune has changed. We'll get more funding that way. We'd better not miss the gravy train and our free trip to Washington, DC."

Just another puppet show orchestrated by puppet master David Steinberg.

History will show who sold off whom.

One should not hoot over anyone dying, but purged ex-junta foreign minister Win Aung (from Khin Nyunt camp) has also died in prison.

I still remember his oily face on TV doing doubletalk.




More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.