ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO






China’s Troublesome Little Brother
By AUNG ZAW Tuesday, September 1, 2009


COMMENTS (4)
RECOMMEND (514)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Behind displays of friendship, Beijing is showing signs that it is losing patience with Burma’s politically inept ruling generals

When Vice Snr-Gen Maung Aye, the second most powerful figure in Burma’s ruling junta, led a high-level delegation to Beijing in mid-June, China’s state-run Xinhua news agency dutifully reported that the visit—the general’s third in six years—was aimed at strengthening friendly and cooperative ties between the two neighboring countries.

Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping, left, holds a welcoming ceremony in honor of Gen Maung Aye, right, vice-chairman of Burma’s ruling junta at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on June 16, 2009. (Photo: www.english.cpc.people.com.cn)
Behind the scenes of the outwardly amicable visit, however, the story was not so simple. According to businessmen close to the regime in Naypyidaw, before departing for Beijing, Maung Aye complained that China was meddling in Burma’s affairs. A former commander of the Burmese army’s northern region who once fought several fierce battles against the Chinese-backed Communist Party of Burma in the 1970s and 1980s, Maung Aye has never really trusted Beijing. Now, he grumbled, Chinese leaders were trying to tell Naypyidaw how it should deal with Aung San Suu Kyi, who was facing imprisonment on charges of violating the terms of her house arrest.

On the Chinese side, too, feelings were far more ambivalent than the Xinhua report would have us believe. Since the 2004 ouster of former Prime Minister Gen Khin Nyunt, Beijing’s relations with the Burmese regime have been on a less secure footing. Unlike the relatively open-minded Khin Nyunt, the current leadership in Naypyidaw consists entirely of dyed-in-the-wool xenophobes. Even a friendly word of advice was likely to strain the relationship carefully built up over the past two decades.

In the end, Maung Aye’s visit passed without incident. Although Beijing had earlier joined Burma’s other neighbors in calling for the release of Suu Kyi, and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao told the Burmese regime’s No 2 that he hoped the military would help to promote democracy in Burma, the pro-democracy leader herself was not mentioned directly in discussions between the two sides. Significantly, however, news of the international outcry over the trial of Suu Kyi aired on Beijing television during Maung Aye’s visit, perhaps sending a message that world opinion could not be ignored, even in Communist-controlled China.

Despite such subtle hints, however, it is clear that Beijing is not about to depart from its long-held policy of noninterference in Burma’s political affairs—a policy that it has maintained even under more trying circumstances.

Chinese workers seal the pipeline along the 1,272-kilometer transnational natural gas pipeline in Luoyang in central China’s Henan Province on Dec 11, 2008. China’s demand for oil and gas has expanded rapidly in recently years to fuel its double-digit economic growth, as the country imported nearly 200 million tons of oil in 2007, up more than 10 percent from 2006. (Photo: AFP)
When Burmese troops and security forces were killing monks on the streets of Rangoon in September 2007, provoking international outrage, Beijing made it clear that it wasn’t going to join in the chorus of criticism. Instead, it reacted by issuing an anodyne statement calling on all parties to exercise restraint—and for the rest of the world to mind its own business. Soon after the dust settled, the Burmese regime’s leader, Snr-Gen Than Shwe, returned the favor by sending an envoy to Beijing to explain the situation. And so the whole episode was reduced to a mere bump in the road of Sino-Burmese relations.

It came as no surprise, then, that when a Burmese court sentenced Suu Kyi to a further 18 months under house arrest on August 11, Beijing did not deviate from its script.

“International society should fully respect Myanmar’s [Burma’s] judicial sovereignty,” said a spokesperson for the Chinese foreign ministry, adding that Beijing would not back any calls for UN action against the Burmese regime.



1  |  2 | 3 



COMMENTS (4)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Moe Aung Wrote:
05/09/2009
I find myself agreeing with both tocharian and Eric Johnston. Investment capital is not a neutral good but with consequences as to whom it really benefits. China is 'Communist' only in name and has pursued an unashamed capitalist line according to Deng's dictum. To be rich is good, and it doesn't matter if the cat is black or white so long as it catches mice. It's no different from Thatcher's looking out for number one. Both are self-centered and glorify greed and at the expense of the greater good. This suited the junta extremely well when it needed to ditch the socialist facade.

Once China switches its backing from the ruling junta to the opposition, there will be far-reaching consequences in store for us. And we need to stay on good terms with our big neighbor and be smart about it so it's to our own advantage.

tocharian Wrote:
04/09/2009
Naboo's comments make me very sad and angry. Han Chinese would never talk like that about their own people even if they are opposed to the Communist Party.

When I lived in Burma, Mao was still around and China was a very different place. China has now extremely ambitious goals, both economical and political, and the rest of the world should be wary of that.

Talking to educated Chinese living in the West, I'm always surprised how little they know or care about other Asian cultures. They assume that what's good for China must be good for other Asians (ethnocentricity)
I might be cynical but I see (Communist!) China acting more like neo-colonists nowadays. They don't need ideology or soldiers with guns to invade. It's more effective to use businessmen with money. You can call it investment, but ultimately who profits from it? Certainly not the poor people in the rural areas of Burma. China doesn't really care about them. Money and Guns rule the world (not quite what Mao said!)

Naboo Wrote:
03/09/2009
Burma has no options except self-destroying. The Army doesn't trust anybody, even its own people. The race always has low morality— looting, raping and cheating, even begging.

Eric Johnston Wrote:
02/09/2009
The Chinese government must be given to understand that, consistent with Burmese sovereignty, which belongs to the people, their investments will be safer under a government of Burma that caters to the needs and aspirations of its people; that, on the contrary, while their investments remain at the mercy of gangsters who recognize no law, least of all international law, whose word carries no weight, for their dictates and pronouncements vary according to the moment, their investments are in very unsound hands.

Moreover, investments that benefit the oppressors of the people are legitimate targets for those who yearn for freedom - which is to say the vast majority of the Burmese people - until such time as their yearning is fulfilled, when the investments will no longer serve such an immoral purpose.


More Articles in This Section

bullet The Mechanics of Manipulation

bullet Those Shadowy Advance Votes

bullet Locked In, Locked Out

bullet Hope on the Horizon?

bullet A Foregone Conclusion

bullet Stranded in Midstream

bullet Avoiding Details Like the Devil

bullet Business as Usual

bullet Boom or Bust?

bullet Mr. Beard Breaks Away






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.