ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
China Must Get Tough on Burma Too
By YENI Monday, June 15, 2009


COMMENTS (8)
RECOMMEND (289)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

The Burmese junta's No 2, Vice Snr-Gen Maung Aye, recently began an official six-day visit to China. This comes as international and regional pressure mounts on Burma to reconsider its ongoing trial against pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

It also comes just after several ethnic ceasefire groups based near the Chinese border reportedly rejected a regime proposal to be reassigned as border guards.

For Maung Aye, the deputy commander-in-chief of the Burmese defense services and commander-in-chief of the Burmese army, this is his third visit to China in six years. The official Chinese news agency, Xinhua, noted that Maung Aye’s meeting with Chinese Vice-President Xi Jinping is one of an "exchange of visits."

Whenever it is facing a crisis, the Burmese junta likes schedule one of these official visits to approach its big brother for advice.

The Burmese army is in turmoil—despite last year entrenching itself in Burmese politics after pushing through a constitution that gives it a guaranteed 25 percent of seats in parliament.

Suddenly, the Burmese army’s authority is being challenged by the ethnic ceasefire groups it has long taken pains to subdue, especially the powerful United Wa State Army, the Kokang group known as the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army and the Kachin Independence Organization, all of which have reportedly rejected the junta’s bid to transform them into border guard forces under Burmese army command.

Behind the pleasantries of his meeting in China, what Maung Aye will be trying to weed out is whether China will take a back seat if the junta launches a military operation against the ceasefire groups.

There is no doubt that China would like to see the Burmese regime and the ceasefire groups negotiate the sensitive issue peacefully and maintain regional "stability," so that China can continue to capitalize on Burma’s natural resources and a border trade which reached US $2.6 billion in 2008.

Apart from the pressing border issue, knowing that Naypyidaw is losing its diplomatic joust with the international community over Suu Kyi’s ridiculous conviction, the Burmese generals are anxious that their traditional ally stands by their side.

Maung Aye is expected to plead for the continued use of the Chinese veto to block any future resolution unfavorable to the Naypyidaw regime.

Concerning the issue of Suu Kyi, China has so far only said that the trial is an internal affair.

At the European Union and China summit in Prague in May, China's Prime Minister Wen Jiabao initially asked the EU to "ensure that our bilateral relationship will not be adversely affected by individual incidents."

However, soon after, Chinese foreign ministry officials voiced rare criticism of the Burmese junta’s treatment of the Nobel Peace Prize laureate at an Asia-Europe Meeting in Hanoi with Burmese Foreign Minister Nyan Win.

There is no doubt the Chinese government has been quietly expanding its international influence in the 21st century. It already commands a superpower’s status throughout Asia, Africa and Latin America in the energy and extractive industries.

China has added to its leadership role in the region by initiating a $10 billion investment cooperation fund and an offer of $15 billion in credit to its Southeast Asian neighbors.

China knows that in the political world, international recognition comes at a price. It must exercise its power carefully and, in countries such as North Korea and Burma where Western countries have little leverage, it must show responsibility.

Of course, Burma is China's closest ally in Southeast Asia and has been a major recipient of Chinese military hardware and a potential springboard for projecting Chinese military power in the region since 1988.

Like the recent public pressure on North Korea for its foolhardy demonstration of nuclear missiles, China must also show a firm hand when dealing with the Burmese regime.

China must send a strong message to Naypyidaw to release political prisoners immediately, including Aung San Suu Kyi, and to start a meaningful dialogue with the opposition, including ethnic groups.

Above all, the junta must be told that the time has come for it to allow its people an opportunity to participate in the development of genuine "national reconciliation."

To this end, China holds the key.



COMMENTS (8)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Duwa Wrote:
17/06/2009
I agree with AK 47.

ROBIN Wrote:
16/06/2009
If Maung Aye carries out a coup, the state media will simply announce that Than Swe has retired and Maung Aye has taken over. Everything will be the same as under Than Shwe. So we must get rid of all of the whole SPDC regime at once.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
16/06/2009
I greatly doubt the sanity of those people who believed China would lean on Than Shwe to release Daw Suu and hold an all inclusive dialogue that will lead to representative rule in Burma.

The Reds need Than Shwe as much as Than Shwe needs them at this time when the Reds are aiming for world hegemony.

Maung Aye has no ambition whatsoever. Expecting Maung Aye to turn on Than Shwe is akin to waiting for Jesus to establish his Kingdom of Heaven on earth any day soon.

The No 2 C-in-C of Burma went to China just to plead with big brother to lean on the Wa and Kokang ethnic Chinese to tow his line and join the so-called border guard units.

I don't believe the Reds will do that, either. Since day one, the Wa and Kokang ethnic Chinese are in place to serve China's purpose of gaining a foothold in Burma, like the ethnic Russians in Georgia.

Than Shwe can save his own hide by working with Daw Suu and live a free man or forever turn himself into a slave of the Reds in Beijing.

The choice is the monk killer's now.

timothy Wrote:
16/06/2009
To become a leader of the world, Chinese leaders must understand the need to build trustworthiness in the eyes of world citizens. I would like to advise the Chinese leaders that economic muscle is not enough to gain leader status. They must earn the respect of citizens by doing decent things.

Supporting the Burmese junta is the worst thing for the Chinese government to do at this juncture. If the Chinese government agrees with Burmese junta to prosecute Daw Suu, I am sorry to say that the junta has tarnished your name, and you should forget about gaining the love of citizens.

AK 47 Wrote:
16/06/2009
China's support for the junta is a short- sighted yet pragmatic strategy. However, there are long-term benefits for the people of Burma and China if the generals could retreat from politics by supporting and allowing free, democratic and open government.
China and the generals are the keys to the future of Burma's prosperity and can avoid going down in history as co-conspirators in the economic and political destruction of Burma.

Salai Hmung Wrote:
16/06/2009
Yeni is right. China holds the key to unlock Burma's problems. But unfortunately, it's unlikely that China will send a strong message to its closest ally in SE Asia in a critical time when Burma badly needs China's help and support over the ASSK trial and 2010 elections. It's not the usual way China plays politics.

Unsurprisingly, we can see China's involvement in every world outpost of tyrannous countries such as Sudan, Iran, Burma and N Korea. Apart from N Korea, China's involvement in these countries is partly because of China's petro-diplomacy. Because China's entire modernization strategy is based on access to abundant supplies of energy.
As we all know, China today accounts for 12 percent of the world's energy consumption, second only to the US. China's demand for oil and oil imports will increase 61 percent by 2020, as experts have predicted.
So, as long as China gets Burma's natural gas from the military regime, it's unlikely that China will send a strong message to the military regime.

tocharian Wrote:
16/06/2009
Perhaps it's the other way round, Mr Yeni. How about Burma getting tough on China? The country is practically run by Chinese (including Singaporean) businessmen and their cronies.

Moe Aung Wrote:
16/06/2009
China holds the key alright. Unless Maung Aye's loyalty to Than Shwe remains unshakable, it can turn Maung Aye effectively against Than Shwe in a palace coup. Provided Maung Aye can be convinced about a realistic exit strategy for the Tatmadaw by removing Than Shwe, the Chinese may yet save their skins and bring about change and a proper dialogue for national reconciliation.

Where the West have failed to make an impact (short of an invasion) on the Tatmadaw for a number of reasons, China has a much better chance to succeed.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.