ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
NLD Still Represents Moral Strength for the Powerless
By YENI Monday, April 20, 2009


COMMENTS (37)
RECOMMEND (265)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Next week, the National League for Democracy (NLD), Burma’s leading political party, which has its legitimacy through a landslide victory in the 1990 election, plans to hold a national-level special meeting. The party executive, those NLD members who were successful in the 1990 election, senior members and representatives of the women’s and youth sections of the party from throughout the country have been invited to attend.

In the two decades since the 1990 election, the NLD has been able to hold only two large-scale meetings, once before the country went to the polls and a second in 1997. An attempt to arrange a meeting in August 1998 of members elected in the 1990 poll failed when the junta arrested several who had planned to take part. Restrictions were also placed on members’ travel.

With the memory of August 1998 in mind, NLD members and observers inside and outside the country are anxiously waiting to see how the authorities react to next week’s planned meeting.

According to the invitations to the special meeting sent out earlier this month by the NLD's 91-year-old chairman Aung Shwe, the party's executive committee would read “a paper” to participants. Although the contents of the paper have not been disclosed, it is expected to cover several issues confronting the party—especially the proposed 2010 general election.

The NLD's current position on the 2010 election is to show readiness to negotiate with the Burmese generals if Naypyidaw agrees to review the constitution, which guarantees the continuation of military domination of the country’s political future, and to free the imprisoned members and leaders of the party.

In an Armed Forces Day speech to the nation on March 27, Burma's supremo Snr-Gen Than Shwe rejected the NLD demands, seeing no need for compromise over his so-called "roadmap to democracy." The junta's deputy leader, Vice Snr-Gen Maung Aye, also urged military officers recently to take responsibility for the success of the 2010 election.

According to the election law of 1990, a political party which can not provide candidates for at least three constituencies must disband. This may represent a serious threat if NLD decides to boycott the 2010 elections, and the junta naturally wants to see all opposition groups fall into this trap. Afterward the military will not hesitate to crack down on them, regardless of the reaction of the international community.

The regime won’t have it all its own way, however, if the NLD agrees to participate in the 2010 election. Observers point out that there is no political party other than the NLD that could win a landslide. The regime would be forced to use traditional techniques—physical abuse and harassments of the opposition parties and their supporters; and electoral fraud—in order to block an NLD victory.   

In its 20 years’ existence, the NLD has been a frequent target of the regime. Some elected members for parliament have died and some have fled into exile. Party leaders such as Aung San Suu Kyi and Tin Oo have been detained and imprisoned. NLD offices across the country have been closed down, their members harassed and forced to leave the party.

Burma's main opposition party realizes that it must continue to carry out its task of tackling the economic and political problems of the country as a leading political party that still has nationwide influence. It knows that its toughest challenge is to confront a brutal, malicious regime.

But the NLD should also know that it is still an organization which could strike fear into the hearts of heavily armed men.

Nevertheless it must remember that whether or not it agrees to participate in the 2010 election NLD will still represent moral strength for the country’s powerless.



COMMENTS (37)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

plan B Wrote:
08/05/2009
"Thanks for the name-calling which you claim you on the moral high ground don't stoop to."

Show me my characterization of you is unfair and I will show you how wrong you are!

"You'd like one side to compromise but not the other because they are now 'dictating from the upper hand' and 'all's fair in love and politics.'Remember the tree stump and the grass."

Can't deal with reality?

"The only thing that does not change in this world is change itself."

Facts, please!

"The support of hoi polloi (you seem to love this derogatory term for the common people - used advisedly then?)"

Here we go again. Empty blowing!

"Every ethnic group" has not diminished as you make it out to be.

With Aung San Suu Kyi still in jail, I did not see any ethnic group protesting.

"They know the real obstacle to progress is the junta when the opposition has exhausted the call for dialogue."

Old news. Move on.

"Resort to armed struggle."

Irresponsible fantasy at this point.

Moe Aung Wrote:
08/05/2009
plan B,

"Leave the 2nd amendment alone from your usual habit of 'quoting out of context'."

This troubles you, doesn't it - the right to bear arms (the people's right to armed resistance)?

I wonder if you are one of those people who admire and emulate the US for its historic and global success and domination, and would rather overlook and don't wish to be reminded of the ugly face of violence and exploitation. Of course it's too close to home for comfort, isn't it? Interesting.

Moe Aung Wrote:
07/05/2009
plan B,

Thanks for the name-calling which you claim you on the moral high ground don't stoop to.
You'd like one side to compromise but not the other because they are now "dictating from the upper hand" and "all's fair in love and politics." Remember the tree stump and the grass. The only thing that does not change in this world is change itself.

"The support of hoi polloi (you seem to love this derogatory term for the common people - used advisedly then?)/every ethnic group" has not diminished as you make it out to be. You wish. They know the real obstacle to progress is the junta when the opposition has exhausted the call for dialogue - just talking to a brick wall in the face of relentless repression, but will not resort to armed struggle.

I don't ask you to stop anything or leave "this or that" alone. You've quoted both the Bible and the Dhammapada. There's really no call for insulting the intelligence of the readers. They can see through your weasel words - no confusion.

plan B Wrote:
06/05/2009
Semantics again.

Did not see Aung San Suu Kyi compromising before her last arrest. That was then when she held a better hand. This is now.

The junta is dictating from the upper hand.
Can you deal with that?

Criticizing is not the same as attacking. May be for an ultra supporter and a rabid junta hater like you it is.

When your hand is weak you either fold or change the necessary cards. Since folding is not an option.

Haven't see NLD or Aung San Suu Kyi shedding the legitimacy card for the real ace: the support of hoi polloi/every ethnic group.
She took that ace for granted the first time.
This time she is going to have to earn it.
Or she will be just another symbol of sore losers.

The suffering of the people will continue.
Stop picking on every word and see the merit as it is.

If you have a specific question ask. Otherwise, stop assuming "this" or "that" for your own benefit.

You are really wasting time and confusing other readers. Leave the 2nd amendment alone from your usual habit of "quoting out of context".

Moe Aung Wrote:
02/05/2009
Attacking Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD on one hand and appeasing the generals on the other, willing to give them (but not the opposition) the benefit of the doubt and a "second chance" repeatedly is hardly "independent thinking".

Democracy has to be fought for and won. Any offer of genuine dialogue to anyone so far?

If anyone is a true believer in the dictum "political power comes from the barrel of a gun," it's the Burmese military regime. Forcing through a constitution in order to legitimize military rule is mere window dressing to conceal the rule of the gun. Legitimized state violence provokes armed resistance. The right to bear arms is enshrined in the American Constitution for exactly the same reason, against the British state at the time.

Moe Aung Wrote:
01/05/2009
plan B,

The "hoi polloi" (I'm not sure if this particular favorite of yours is a deliberate pejorative) are not expecting handouts from a charitable junta, plan B or anyone else. It's their country, their rights, they are the salt of the earth. They'll fight (literally) when it comes to the crunch.

"I recall clearly Aung San Suu Kyi stating unequivocally that 'the participation of this junta is necessary' to bring about the needed change."

What did you expect her to say in her situation? Down with the junta?

"Wealth/economic means power."

With your generals, you got it the wrong way round - a case in point. Fine, follow the money, follow the generals, and what do you get? Scraps from the lords' table, unless you happen to be opium warlords turned leading entrepreneurs. Then you might eat at the same table, or rather, snouts together in the trough.

"If the money is clearly used for corrupt purposes...instead of helping the hoi polloi"

Enlighten us if you know differently.

plan B Wrote:
01/05/2009
1)Building a temple doesn't make Than Shwe any more a Buddhist. With better next life guarantee.
2) Associating me with Ko Okkar and his ilk doesn't make me less independent thinking.
3) Dropping names quoting out of context refusing to recognize the consequences of your 3S plan does make you cavalier at best and dangerous at worst.

plan B Wrote:
30/04/2009
KMA can be counted on to:

1) Quote out of context, thus by innuendo dismiss those with different ideas as "junta sympathizers," or worse, anti-Aung San Suu Kyi/NLD. I recall clearly Aung San Suu Kyi stating unequivocally that "the participation of this junta is necessary" to bring about the needed change.

Does that make you anti-Aung San Suu Kyi/NLD, or worst, a junta stooge? From your 3s plan?
In your zeal to name drop names, using Talleyrand, Tocqueville and Turnell to your own advantage, you have failed miserably to highlight appropriate point.

Your charlatan Turnell even made a very good point you missed. The point about the money from the gas sale, what happened?

The implications are tremendous: If the money is clearly used for corrupt purposes, which The Irrawaddy should investigate and report, instead of helping the hoi polloi which Irrawaddy insinuate by bad news.

Wealth/economic means power. Knowing where the junta has its wealth can go a long way in helping the citizenry in a lot of ways.

KMA and his ilk: "We still need you but not this way."

Moe Aung Wrote:
29/04/2009
"..she (ASSK) is no longer different from the very regime she is fighting against." Okkar

"Substitute the SPDC for NLD with SPDC and one can no longer tell the difference." pLan B

Singing from the same hymn book.

pLan B Wrote:
29/04/2009
KMA,

In my comments so far where did I ever state or even imply that I would like you or anyone to "turn a blind eye on what's been going on under your fine upstanding generals"?

Call me a liar, or call yourself one.

Innuendos? Even your sarcasm is tinged with bitterness and hatred.

Some Burmese after being in a foreign land like Australia began to adopt a foreign acquired attitude of disdain without need to restrain, forgetting their origin--"Burmese".

Remember: in that foreign land of yours you will always be a foreigner, so do not delude yourself about being anything else.

Learn yourself and teach others the concept of "Ah Na There"

Facts, not innuendos. My 101 clearly stated.

Moe Aung Wrote:
28/04/2009
pLan B:

"Blind hatred for the present government." Only hatred for no reason or from ignorance such as color prejudice is blind. Fine if what you want is for us to turn a blind eye on what's been going on under your fine upstanding generals, draw a line underneath, and start again like that would happen.

"You know I do not label others unless absolutely necessary." Gee, thanks.

Aik:

"I'll be with any group who works against the stubborn ruling military regime, or to build a better society." My sentiments exactly. Join plan B to work with/for the generals; he's touting for business in more ways than one.

pLan B Wrote:
27/04/2009
Aik,

My sincere apology. I do not intend to be hurtful. My mistake in associating you with the likes of Ko Moe Aung, lorilmag and other non-Burmese armchair advocates got the better of me. it will not happen again.

Your individual take is now clear to me. Go for it.

You know well where I stand.

Kind regards. Please forgive.

Okkar,

Let's stick to the facts. They speak for themselves. There are two camps in this forum:

1) Blind hatred for the present government.
2) The rest of us who would like to see changes but not at the further cost of the citizenry, where our relatives and friends are embedded.

Speak clearly even if you are a plant as everybody claimed. It doesn't really matter unless one cannot think for oneself.

Worst is when somebody forces you to see their way through charlatans like Sean Turnell.

You know I do not label others unless absolutely necessary. In this case it is more than appropriate.

Read his thought here:
http://www.econ.mq.edu.au/burma_economic_watch

Moe Aung Wrote:
27/04/2009
Okkar,

The sons of ASSK are there because they happen to be Anglos and British-born. And like they would be safe living in Burma where their mother is the most hated and feared person by the rulers!

It's your generals who are pretty hacked off about their offspring also being blacklisted and barred from the West and having to make do with Singapore. That wedding certainly was in the public interest. How did that video get out anyway - like the one of Sandar Win's anniversary? Only these days we have YouTube.

Is that the best you can do now - "no longer different from the very regime she is fighting against" or "equally guilty"? Pathetic and desperate.

Like Aik said, the NLD is not the only player, but it remains the main one that stands a real chance of trouncing your lot once again should they change their mind and decide to contest the elections. Hence you lot have been concentrating your attacks on Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD in the media and physically on the party activists and leaders. Scared?

nono Wrote:
27/04/2009
There is no difference between Than Shwe and Suu Kyi? I will tell you the difference: dictatorship and democracy.

Okkar Wrote:
25/04/2009
It doesn’t have to be "below the belt" to point out the facts. Opposition supporters have been doing this practice since long ago. Did you forget about Than Shwe's daughter’s wedding? How The Irrawaddy and other media covered. Is it not below the belt too? At the end of the day, it is like, you reap what you sow.

It is an entirely valid point to question about Suu Kyi's sons. After all, she was propelled into her position - in her own words - "her father's daughter." Would Suu Kyi have called on sanctions if her sons were living and studying in Burma? The point I am trying to make here is selfishness and self preservation of Suu Kyi. In light of that, she is no longer different from the very regime she is fighting against.

Aik Wrote:
25/04/2009
plan B:

I don't think I have to or should tell you when I was last in Burma. But one thing I know is that my family, my relatives, my friends are still suffering under the military rule.

I don't think I or the people have to rely on NLD for their living or well being. And I don't think that Burma's politics is just between NLD and the ruling military regime. I don't think that the people in exile, who are relying on international donors, are the agents of change.

But I can surely tell you one thing. There are ordinary people who are willing to do anything for their children, or to help their children so that they can lead a decent living standard.

It's a very sad thing that we only think about the junta and NLD, and forget to consider other alternatives. There are many armed groups around Burma and so many other political parties who are important for the future.

I'll be with any group who works against the stubborn ruling military regime, or to build a better society.

Moe Aung Wrote:
24/04/2009
plan B,

That's a hat-trick with your link. Great article by Kyaw Zwa Moe or by plan B? And of course, sanctions have nothing to do with Okkar's and your generals' policies and actions. Must be my stupid mistake.

"..Aung San Suu Kyi is in jail without much complaint from within." You wish. You are sounding more like Sandar. Where's she gone?

plan B Wrote:
24/04/2009
KMA—Be your own worst enemy. I am trying to see the "below the belt" accusation you have on Okkar opinion and your response to mine. "Venomous" is what comes to mind.
No wonder Aung San Suu Kyi is in jail without much complaint from within. The without help she expected is just exactly that—"without".

Aik—Playing armchair politician is fine and dandy with no personal stake. When have you last traveled inside Burma to justify your advice that the NLD should again boycott the so called road-map. Wasn’t there a great article by Ko Kyaw Zwa Moe just recently pondering that subject?

http://irrawaddy.org/opinion_story.php?art_id=15422

Please, no more pushing the NLD to oblivion through pouting. Time to play the villain's game. Call their bluff. All they have to lose is this now nearly empty 20 + yo legitimacy. This claim to legitimacy is becoming an albatross.

The cards may be stacked against them. The Burmese people can still be their aces. It is not too late to win them back over.



Moe Aung Wrote:
23/04/2009
Aik, well said.

Below the belt, Okkar. Deprived of her freedom and family? No goodbye to her husband? Shame on you.

All you can accuse all comers of is "ambition for power." Can't use the other ones - sovereignty and holding the union together?

plan B,

"..other milder mannered individuals that are willing to sacrifice for the Burmese people in their non-political way."

Everyone has their role to play, my dear fellow. It takes all sorts to make a world. Wouldn't fancy living in a world where everyone's like you or me.

"..middle ground..through..armed struggles"?

Isn't that a bit of an oxymoron?

"Substitute the SPDC for NLD with SPDC and one can no longer tell the difference."

A cunning prejudgement in whose favor I wonder.

"The NLD is playing politics—Not I."

Not guilty, eh? No,of course not; punching just a little bit above your weight. Give all your best to health and education charity work where you claim you've done so much and are well appreciated. But don't give up your day job.

plan B Wrote:
23/04/2009
Lorilmeg—In reviewing the comments of the supporters of the NLD, one can not help but notice:

1) Will not accept anything less than what they think they should rightfully have. For instance, no middle ground, be it through election or historic armed struggles.
Corollary: Any suggestion that reveals their flawed approach. Any hint of that flawed/mistake is immediately labeled as pro-enemy and ridiculed, dismissed, characterized with very strongly negative terms.
2) Will do anything at the expense of the ones that they profess to benefit to achieve their mandate. Be it through political/forceful/corrupted means from without or within.
3) Will persecute any opposing view literally (prison), figuratively (words).

Substitute the SPDC for NLD with SPDC and one can no longer tell the difference. It's one of those "Damned if you do and damned if you don't" situations for the hoi polloi of Burma. Talk about apathy.

plan B Wrote:
23/04/2009
KMA—In your glaring bitterness you have proven that you are willing to pay any price to achieve your wishful idealistic hope. Even if the price is off the back of the citizenry.
Exactly what I said about the attitude of Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD.
Look at the articles today on TB and, yes, diarrheal Diseases you are so blinded by your own hatred for the regime you will forfeit the chance for immediate care to these most vulnerable over political differences.
The coming historical, albeit absolutely shameful election will again test the NLD. If the NLD attitude and action again parallel your venom it will be another 20 years of lost opportunity.
In projecting yourself as an intransigent hardcore I sincerely hope you will not be found guilty of turning off other milder mannered individuals that are willing to sacrifice for the Burmese people in their non-political way.
Please do not confuse being political with playing politics. The NLD is playing politics—Not I.
Everything else can be construe as political.

Okkar Wrote:
23/04/2009
The only thing the NLD represent is their ambition for power. So far, they have proven that all they care about is getting their hands on power and claim that they would do so "by any mean necessary," even if it means pushing the country further into the poverty pit.

Its easy for Suu Kyi to call for sanctions because her sons are not affected by the sanctions. They live a life of luxury and having good education, while the rest of the country has to suffer due to the mistakes and irresponsible actions of their mother. How is that for representing the country's powerless?



Aik Wrote:
22/04/2009
Representing moral strength for the powerless alone should not be the role of the NLD. The party is politically too weak as its leader Daw Suu has been under house arrest, that it has been for two decades bogged down in the results of 1990 elections, which are simply ignored by the stubborn military regime. The party could have been playing a greater role in resolving the political crisis in the country by actively and pro-actively engaging with other existing political forces, including parties that participated in the 1990 elections as well as those that didn't but have potential in taking part in building a new nation.

The NLD must not just request or demand dialogue with the regime, whose ignorance is obvious enough.

There is a chance for the NLD to prove its leadership role in the movement for democracy, by publicly and openly ignoring the junta's roadmap, and instead spelling out its own one which can be accepted by anti-military rule forces including armed and other ethnic political parties.

Moe Aung Wrote:
22/04/2009
Plan B—

My reputation is the last thing I'm worried about. And if it's not hurting it's not working.

You remain hopelessly mixed up in your laudable zeal in helping people personally and the broader picture which, despite your denial, is called politics. Party politics is merely the public face of politics, what's on stage, get it?

If "mixing politics with good deeds will muddy the water", why are you so persistent, like an attack dog in savaging Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD on one hand and urging everyone to work with your good generals (whose record for such cooperation is conspicuous by its absence) on the other?

Perhaps you simply fancy yourself as the next messiah for Burma. Don't keep your hopes up with your sermon on the mount. It's too pedestrian, since all the beef in it is merely charity organization kind of work where you belong. And look! Why is there poison in your holy grail?

plan B Wrote:
22/04/2009
Lorimag—

Why does the fear of benefiting the generals have anything to do with helping the healthcare and education of the citizenry? Killing the patient may be an ultimate cure for the disease; however I shall not condone such method. If the general benefit from serving the most vulnerable, so be it.

plan B Wrote:
22/04/2009
Lorimag—

Just an anecdotal remark on the mandate that you assume the NLD has earned.
If you will care to comment on the mistakes the NLD has made in last 20 years that incite the paranoia of this junta, thus setting the country back considerably to this present near-failed state, then we can begin to discuss the mandate that you conveniently bestow without qualifying the responsibilities that the mandate entails.

plan B Wrote:
22/04/2009
Lorilmag—

As for the NLD:
My first comment below will suffice. What the NLD has done has been primarily for the glory of the NLD. There are works that need to be done and are being done both by the government as well as individuals and non-political entities quietly, unheralded and, yes, sacrificially.
I hope that answers your question,
Remember in one of my 101 opinions posted, if you think it through you will find your unique answer.
As for what else the NLD can do to remake itself, I implore you to read my comment carefully again.

plan B Wrote:
22/04/2009
Lorilmag—Sacrificial= Anything done for the benefit of others without even appearing self-serving.
Please read my simple 101 opinions carefully and thoughtfully and you will find your answer. By the way I do not do "Platitude". This is a take it or leave it 101

plan B Wrote:
22/04/2009
Ko Moe Aung, if you sincerely wish to learn what needs to be done—which I doubt you do—then read carefully the 101 comments that you have so willingly, disrespectfully dismissed here:

http://irrawaddy.org/opinion_story.php?art_id=15422

Mostly unjustified and could be hurtful, if the provider had been less understanding.
Remember you represent the possible future of Burma. Be very careful in recording words that might tarnish your reputation.

plan B Wrote:
22/04/2009
I have spelled out what one can do to support the citizenry in my other comments.

http://irrawaddy.org/opinion_story.php?art_id=15422

These are simple ideas upon which anybody can build on once we are beyond belittling each other.
Building/supporting healthcare/clinics can offer the most vulnerable the needed help.
I will let you figure out the education part.
I am quite sure you will see the opportunity in social services too.
Providing or supporting the ongoing relief effort is another one.
Did not I mention mixing politics with good deed will muddy the water.
NLD has from day 1 being anti-junta in everything be it good or bad for the citizenry.
Now you know why there is very little sympathy from hoi polloi beyond token protest for the persecution of NLD members.
You keep mentioning red army ironically in your zeal to mock me you conveniently forgot how the future PLA members help the most vulnerable first. THis is building consensus from the ground up.

lorilmag Wrote:
21/04/2009
Plan B,

I've read numerous comments by you on the need for a "sacrificial" commitment to improving the lot of the citizenry. I still have no idea what, in fact, you have in mind. Could you please spell out exactly what it is you want, without resorting to the same old platitudes ("We must do what is good for the people.")? Specifically, what is it you expect of the NLD? If I recall correctly, they have in the past provided food relief to impoverished citizens, only to have their efforts shut down by the junta. What "sacrifice" would you have them make? Many are already in prison for their crime of trying to represent the citizenry that elected them two decades ago. Having sacrificed their freedom for the sake of the citizenry, should they now "sacrifice" (i.e., abandon) their mandate to speak on behalf of ordinary Burmese? How exactly would that benefit anybody other than the generals?

I look forward to your response.

Moe Aung Wrote:
21/04/2009
Seems like open season for those ever so keen to hit the NLD into the ground while it's down, never mind even to call a special meeting, let alone do something practical, is subject to the whim of the junta that more often than not comes down like a ton of bricks on the party activists. Bravo!

plan B Wrote:
21/04/2009
That one must learn to lead through serving seems to elude the powers that be of the NLD. Clinging on blindly to the now tragically near empty claim of legitimacy, nothing else in services to the citizenry is offered.
Services to the hoi polloi beyond talk?
Even the present ruling junta knows how to stage these services for the benefit of the press.
To show that it really is the representation of the better future it should remake itself through sacrificial acts at the level where the hoi polloi can identify with. Imprisonment for political ideas is tragic.
Getting persecuted for really serving the citizenry, such as giving alms, arranging relief efforts, encouraging healthy habits etc, and even agreeing with the rare positive contribution of this present government, will surely incite the support of citizenry from the ground up.
Otherwise, by volition or omission, the NLD deserves historic oblivion through its present empty self-serving claim of representing the powerless/most vulnerable.

Moe Aung Wrote:
21/04/2009
"..whether or not it agrees to participate in the 2010 election, the NLD will still represent moral strength for the country’s powerless."

Hear,hear!

'Elections 2010' and the NLD - you are damned if you do and damned if you don't. But yes, the moral authority that ASSK and her party enjoy can only grow for making a stand on behalf of the oppressed peoples of Burma.

It's not so much the elections per se than the premise this whole thing stands on and the kind of parliament it will lead to, all stemming from reneging on the results of the last elections and from a new constitution got up like some loaded dice and steamrollered through on the back of Nargis.

The NLD must prepare for all likely scenarios, transform and rejuvenate its leadership and formulate strategies not just for its survival but to strengthen the people power movement and forge ahead - because it looks like it is make or break time for the NLD.

plan B Wrote:
21/04/2009
The NLD has long ago sold itself off to the patronizing Western promise/illusion of rescue from without. While doing such, it has endorsed policies that have extracted a heavy price off the back of Burmese citizenry, even though the present junta is to blame for much.
If the NLD really aspires to represent the powerless/the most vulnerable, it needs to totally remake itself from a ground-up approach.
A party for the people must not abandon any avenue that will benefit the people in any way.
Advocating for the most vulnerable of the citizenry must be the absolute guiding principle. This principle must then be transformed into action that must not appear self- serving but rather sacrificial.
Only then can the NLD again claim to represent the powerless/the most vulnerable.


Okkar Wrote:
21/04/2009
Could moral strength feed a family? This just goes to show how much the NLD is out of touch with reality.

Kyaw Sein Wrote:
21/04/2009
It's so true that the NLD still represents moral strength for the country's powerless. However, that's not the right way the NLD should follow. For this 2010 election, the NLD should have an informed decision what to do, and how to do, as well as why to do for the sake of the country. In this sense, it's clear that the NLD leadership is so weak. We didn't hear anything from them.
Perhaps, the leadership is so old and the NLD itself hesitates to believe young Burmese people who have every understanding of the country, and hand over their powers to them. This is killing the country. So, this is the right time for the NLD, whether they can produce informed decisions regarding the election 2010 or hand over their leadership powers to young people, those who have such decisions and talent.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.