ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Burma’s Future Hangs on the Suu Kyi Trial Verdict
By YENI Monday, August 10, 2009


COMMENTS (9)
RECOMMEND (360)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Unless the trial of Aung San Suu Kyi is again adjourned, a verdict will be given on Tuesday. It will demonstrate how the Burmese regime responds to calls by the people of Burma and the international community for an urgent start national reconciliation.

Suu Kyi faces a sentence of up to five years’ imprisonment if convicted of violating the terms of her house arrest by sheltering the American John Yettaw after he entered her home illegally in May. Her trial has dragged on for three months while the US, European governments and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) have all called for her release.

In one of the most recent appeals, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon last week urged the junta to free all political prisoners, including Suu Kyi, after convening a meeting of the "Group of Friends" of Burma. The group consists of 15 countries—Burma's neighbors, interested Asian and European nations, and the five permanent UN Security Council members, the US, Russia, China, Britain and France.

"I expect that the authorities of Myanmar [Burma] will respond positively and in a timely manner to the expectations and concerns and repeated calls of the international community to release all political prisoners and particularly Daw Aung San Suu Kyi," Ban told reporters.

However, on the eve of Suu Kyi’s “judgment day,” there is no sign of a change of heart by the generals.

Security forces have been deployed increasingly on the streets of the old capital, Rangoon, since the trial began. Over the weekend, the state-controlled media warned that the junta may be preparing a significant crackdown.

"Demanding [the] release of Daw Suu Kyi means showing reckless disregard for the law," said a commentary in the state-run English-language newspaper, New Light of Myanmar.

But the constant postponements in the trial may be a signal that the junta is at least examining the consequences of possible domestic and international anger if a tough verdict is handed down. As The Irrawaddy reported on Monday (The Irrawaddy online: “Regime Reportedly Divided over Suu Kyi Sentence”), sources within the Burmese army are also saying the delays are caused by disagreements within the military regime over how severely to punish her.

Whatever the court decides on Tuesday, the Burmese military leaders need to find a way to release Suu Kyi and to start immediately a political dialogue with the opposition for the sake of the country.

A recent suggestion by Singapore's Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong offers food for thought. Fielding questions at a luncheon conference on Asia-Middle East engagement with editors and senior journalists from Southeast Asia, the Middle East, China and India last week, Goh said: "Leadership is important, law and order, a pro-business environment; work out the necessary strategy for Myanmar. If it pursues the right path, the right economic policies, in 10 years, you’ll boom."

In that way, Burma's military can demonstrate, by dropping the charge against Suu Kyi, freeing all political prisoners and immediately starting political dialogue, that they can change their political position from being part of the problem to part of the solution. It’s to be hoped that Suu Kyi and her opposition will follow that path.

It is time to grab this opportunity. If it’s missed, Burma's miseries will just continue with no end in sight.



COMMENTS (9)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

pLan B Wrote:
15/08/2009
timothy
Okkar can say anything. Pointing out his fallacy and his obviously sentiment-driven anti-DASSK do not constitute stifling of free speech at The Irrawaddy.
Okkar can say what he wants even if he is a SPDC representative, which has not been proven beyond reproach.
By all accounts, any one here is only one word away from being labeled as such.
As for the freedom denied inside Burma, the root of which is the SPDC, are there any other factors that make the SPDC rooted that well today? Doing what they do well, oh so well?

There are more sufferings among the Burmese than DASSK's persecution. DASSK's freedom is not the Burmese mass's freedom.

timothy Wrote:
14/08/2009
Okkar is giving his comment on this message board and enjoying the freedom of expression in democratic civilised society. This is the freedom people in Burma yearning for. They want to be liberated from oppression of military dictatorship. The people hope is Daw Aung San Su Kyi. I advice you to go to www.theelders.org. You will see the empty chair reserved for Daw Su by elderly nobal laureates. Daw Su and these elders had attained the saint status and revered by current greatest leaders of the world. Will you dare to say that Daw Su and Elders are criminals? I challenge you to make such statement on this message board.

pLan B Wrote:
13/08/2009
Ko Okkar,

I have always respected you as an independent thinker that will cast doubt through intelligent questions which you have done quite often.

Calling DASSK a criminal is NOT one of the great example.

Your bad assumption detracts from your legitimate claim that DASSK should not be valued above the Burmese people as a rule.

DASSK is not a criminal by any standard. DASSK do not deserve the present trumped up incarceration.

DAASK need to be freed right away and unconditionally. There must never be "no if,and or but about these 3 facts".

If you loath DASSK at least make sure that you make clear those two facts are mutually exclusive. You will be then no better than SPDC haters here.

Please continue pointing out fallacies. Take all the heat of incivility. Make it worthwhile by stating something bold to benefit the people. Otherwise leave DASSK alone

S Wrote:
11/08/2009
The junta will never see themselves as wrong. They will never say "sorry." They are very egoistic. They will never care about the future of the country because they are not the leaders. They don't know what is leadership. They are soldiers. They did not go through the hardship or struggle for independence except the battles. They are good at battles, not at development of a country or nation.

Like Daw ASSK, we are pessimistic aboutthe trial. Delay is most probably because of disagreement among themselves. They don't care about the international cry and requests and demands because they and Daw ASSK and the international community do not talk the same language, do not have the same interest.

Two lines which are going in their own direction will never meet and cross each other.

The fate of the people of Burma is grave if the junta do not want to see themselves and change.

offshore Wrote:
11/08/2009
Economy, economy, economy!
Suu Kyi's release is not relevant for the country. Why all the fuss?
"Leadership is important, law and order, a pro-business environment; work out the necessary strategy for Myanmar. If it pursues the right path, the right economic policies, in 10 years, you’ll boom."

timothy Wrote:
10/08/2009
"Demanding [the] release of Daw Suu Kyi means showing reckless disregard for the law," said a commentary in the state-run English-language newspaper, New Light of Myanmar. In one of the most recent appeals, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon last week urged the junta to free all political prisoners, including Suu Kyi, after convening a meeting of the "Group of Friends" of Burma. The group consists of 15 countries—Burma's neighbors, interested Asian and European nations, and the five permanent UN Security Council members, the US, Russia, China, Britain and France.

pLan B Wrote:
10/08/2009
Here we go again, tying up other hands to ensure the status quo. DASSK must be released.
There should be no quid pro quo as far is any engagement/lifting of blanketed sanctions with DASSK's release.
Tying any DASSK liberty with any needed policy changes by the West may be cosmetically good for both sides.
It will just allow both sides again to use that as a factor to their own advantage when ever it suits them without regard of the "the people."

Okkar Wrote:
10/08/2009
I am a citizen of Myanmar and I did not call for the release of Su Kyi. My country's future does not depend on a criminal. As a criminal, if she is found guilty, then Suu Kyi should serve her prison term just like everyone else. She should not be allowed to get away from committing the crime. Suu Kyi as a politician should set herself as an example that no politicians are above the law. If she is her father's daughter, she should take the guilty verdict gracefully and show Myanmar people and the world that she truly believes in truth, justice and peaceful society.

CB Wrote:
10/08/2009
It is certain that if Suu is not released this time tomorrow there's never any end for her. It's the rich military junta for ever and poor citizens for ever.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.