ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
The US-Burma Connection
By AUNG ZAW Tuesday, November 15, 2011


COMMENTS (8)
RECOMMEND (397)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Burma is nowhere close to America geographically—the Southeast Asian nation is sandwiched between the two most populous countries in the world, rising powers China and India. However, Washington has a growing strategic interest in Burma and is a vital player in shaping the international community’s Burma policy and the collective efforts to bring democracy and human rights to the long-oppressed people of the country.

Some critics have argued for years that Washington’s brand of megaphone and big stick diplomacy will never work to bring about change in Burma. But it seems that the Obama administration’s current dual track approach—of engagement coupled with sanctions—has been the most effective international Burma policy to date, helping both to prod the Burmese government into opening up to constructive dialogue and motivating it to make changes that it may not otherwise have made.

“In Burma, where the United States has consistently advocated for democratic reforms and human rights, we are witnessing the first stirrings of change in decades,” US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in an address to the East-West Center in Honolulu, Hawaii on Thursday.

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

While noting that many open questions remain, including the issues of political prisoners and conflicts with ethnic groups, Clinton said that the Burmese government will find a partner in the US if they pursue a policy of genuine and lasting reform that benefits the people of the country.

As the US secretary of state said, the US has long supported Burma’s democracy movement, investing diplomatic capital in the effort and openly supporting its leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, for the two decades following the deadly crackdown by the previous Burmese military regime on the 1988 mass uprising.

In the subsequent years, Washington downgraded its diplomatic relationship with Burma, cut off foreign aid and imposed strong sanctions on the previous regime, its leaders and its cronies—sanctions that were passed by the US Congress and continue to receive bi-partisan support.

In 2010, the Burmese regime orchestrated an election under the auspices of a military-drafted Constitution. Most of the political leaders of the new government, both in the executive and legislative branch, were senior generals in the previous brutal regime that thumbed its nose at, deceived and manipulated the Burmese people and international community for two decades. The Obama administration appropriately stated that the election was neither free nor fair, and US sanctions carried over and now apply to the new Burmese government, its leaders and its cronies as well.

At the same time, however, the door to dialogue between the US and Burma clearly opened with the Obama administration’s new engagement policy and US officials have received warm receptions in Burma since, especially after the election.

During the year leading up to the election and continuing to date, high-ranking US officials have made many visits to Burma. They have sent a consistent message that it wants Burma to rejoin the international community and will work with the current government and reduce or eliminate sanctions to the extent that concrete democratic and human rights reforms are instituted.

Among the parade of officials delivering this message in person has been US Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and, more recently, US Special Representative to Burma Derek Mitchell and US Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Michael Poser, all of whom have met with senior Burmese government officials and opposition and ethnic leaders.

The US has already demonstrated that it will loosen its restrictions if doing so will aid the process of communication and reform—the Burmese foreign minister, who previously was subject to a US travel ban, was permitted to visit Washington D.C. and meet with Campbell and other high-ranking state department officials.

But the lifting of US sanctions is another matter, and the Burmese government still has a long way to go if it wishes to see that happen. As Mitchell noted in his press briefing, the US sanctions are US law, so the Obama administrations could only lift sanctions in consultation with the US Congress.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (8)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Olive Wrote:
22/11/2011
Although, we have lack of positive understanding of current development, we still expect the promising future of our country. We Burmese are always optimistic as current situation is a promising wind of new political change as things are moving forward, dramatically so we Burmese look this situation in positive way as DSKK even agreed to re-register her party and participate in by-election. Look at the world, everybody knows the attitude of 50 years old military government, and their puppet civilian unformed government, but all are positively pushing the current government to make more changes, thus we people of Burma suffering distress for more than 5 decades should also have entitlement to expect some wind of reconciliation and democratic reform in our war-tern and socially-ailed country. We Burmese should also be united and support the effort of DSKK,UTS (the president), Mr. Obama, Mr. BK Moon and others well-wisher who want to see Burma as a leading Asian country and a blooming eastern STAR again. Thanks

Phillip Wrote:
22/11/2011
As much as I like to see change in the future for Burma, most of the comments below make me think differently. Please remember everybody is out for his or herself, except the general public of the Union of Burma. Burma needs help from outside like the minorities needed help from outside back then. It just too bad that we as a whole has had to wait for the help to come for the past 60years and still waiting. But the help is knocking on the door. Let's see if that help can transform Burma. Still waiting.

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
22/11/2011
There is no such thing as free lunch. By the way, I knew precisely what would happen to Egypt.

ludu Wrote:
21/11/2011
Burma never need support from US to counter-balance this or that. They just need actual genuine help from US, something like all Burmese exports goods can go to US and EU. That can really change lies of poor people in the country.

Moe Aung Wrote:
21/11/2011
The seeming ambivalence in the record of US policy on successive regimes in Burma starting from the AFPFL govt since independence can be explained by one crucial element - the role of anti-communism which became less relevant after 1989.

Obama's dual track approach has achieved results but worked only in tandem with the change in the generals' perception of their own situation and status inside and in the wider world; the strongest incentive for change has to be their survival instinct. They seem confident and to know exactly what they want and what they are doing. You underestimate them at your peril.

Venus Wrote:
20/11/2011
Anyway, US- Myanmar relation is a good sign of no matter what their personal interests are. Once Myanmar has gained the exposure to the world especially US, EU, and civilized world, this new horizon of Myanmar will be brighter than China-Myanmar- India" three in one" horizon. The potential of Myanmar will be rising again. US, EU, Thailand, China, India, they all have their own interest, but at least balance of power can prevail.

Norman Hla Wrote:
20/11/2011
Thank you Zaw Aung for your fair comments on all world superpowers. If bama military rulers are sincerely to change, it is like a fighter jet with all are in automatic control(step down at once). I am in doubt as long as than shwe does not stop killing ethnics. Reasons are (1)ethnics never invade Rangoon and Mandalay in all Bama cities even during democratic eruptions (see 88 cease-fire agreement). What are the ethnics'threat? (2) US help Ne win for arm supply and spy techniques when Ne win was hitting Bama communists (see Zaw Aung's writing). However, those arms were for hitting all ethnics later. US must knew this kind of Ne win's cruelty on all ethnics by any means.(3)Now, US is coming again to Bama for communist influences.(4) i myself welcome any superpowers to come to crush "than shwe" by any means whether you are US, China, India or Russia. Anybody who can crush than shwe is our friend whether US or China takes advantage on us in future for another 50 years in contract. I never respect the all governments of superpower.

KML Wrote:
16/11/2011
This is a very good opportunity for the U Then Sein’s Government to shift higher gear for the reform, i.e., proactive rather than reactive. Reform is like driving a manual car, not automatic one. If we see Japanese after the WW2, how hard working and resilient are they? Majority of Burmese are optimistic, hardworking and resilient, but coming with at least four weaknesses,
1. Never admit past mistakes
2. Seldom learn form the past mistakes
3. Thinking all expectation will come together overnight
4. Thinking changes will come automatically

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.