ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Suu Kyi Free; The Struggle Resumes
By KYAW ZWA MOE Sunday, November 14, 2010


COMMENTS (6)
RECOMMEND (370)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

On Nov. 13 when Aung San Suu Kyi was released, the world celebrated, in contrast to Nov. 7 when the ruling junta held its election, and the world bemoaned the sham election.

Kyaw Zwa Moe is managing editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected].

Suu Kyi's release has stirred Burma's stagnant political waters and overnight boosted the  morale of the Burmese people.
 
After her father, national leader Aung San, was assassinated in 1947, no one could unite the Burmese people and capture their imagination. But since Suu Kyi return to Burma, she has taken up her father's mantle and wherever she appears crowds gather.

On Friday, one day before her release, thousands of people gathered in front of her house to greet her. On Saturday, they came back early in the morning and waited patiently until about 5 p.m. when she was finally released, and she emerged to greet her supporters at the gate of her lakeside compound.

Again, on Sunday thousands of people gathered when she made her fist public speech at the headquarters of her party, the National League for Democracy, despite the fact that they might become targets of the oppressive security forces. When she entered politics in 1988, at her fist appearance she drew about half million people at Shwedagon Pagoda in Rangoon.

“Do not lose your heart,” the 65-year-old pro-democracy leader told the crowd at noon on Sunday. “We all have to keep trying to win what we want.” Again, she inspired the crowd, but her mission is now long overdue. 

Her release from house arrest was not an act of kindness or generosity. Her sentence simply expired, and the generals believe that they have a “mandate” after their proxy, the Union Solidarity and Development Party, won in a landslide. Than Shwe must believe that her release will have little affect now that his party will control the new parliament.

But he may be wrong. In her Sunday speech, Suu Kyi stressed that everyone must work for national reconciliation. However, the generals have never been interested in reconciliation. They only want their power consolidated.

Though her speech didn't go into policy or strategy details on how she might work to move democracy forward, Suu Kyi conveyed a determined and flexible image.

“I will not only work with my party,” she said. “I want to work with all the people and all pro-democracy forces. We will also work with all people across the world who support and sympathize with us.”
Burma has several critical issues waiting for her attention, such as the release of all political prisoners, ethnic conflicts, the unjust 2008 Constitution, and the vote rigging in the election.

However, it's certain the military regime will never allow her to work with leaders of political and ethnic parties. That was one of the main reasons she was imprisoned for 15 of the past 21 years. If she reorganizes the NLD and tries to organize other democracy forces, she will only become a target again and her days of freedom will be numbered.

On top of that, don't forget that she was arrested in 2003 after her motorcade was ambushed by junta thugs in Depayin in Upper Burma. That attack was an assassination attempt. If she again becomes a political threat, the current military government won't be reluctant to orchestrate a Depayin-style ambush again.

When asked about her security during a press conference after her speech, she said that she doesn't think about her personal security, but, like all other citizens, her security depends on the authorities. Senior NLD leaders are obviously concerned about security.

“After the Depayin incident, we saw that there had been an attempt to assassinate her,” said Win Tin, a prominent NLD leader. Citing the assassination of Pakistan's former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto as an example, he added: “As a political leader who always deals with the people, she can be assassinated by a killer who is hiding in the crowd at any time.”

People might think such thoughts are too pessimistic, particularly on the second day of her release. But who knows? We have witnessed the oppressive heartlessness of the generals in the 2007 attack on monks.

In spite of the past and the dangers of the future, Suu Kyi said she doesn't bare any grudge against the junta. “I am willing to talk to Snr-Gen Than Shwe,” she said at the press conference.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (6)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Myanmar Patriots Wrote:
22/11/2010
Tom Tun Wrote:
"Adam Selene,
1) If there is a fair and just labour law, why should a country need labour unions?.."

TOM TUN, Labour unions or trade unions are integral part of management. A union represents the members,the workers. It is not feasible for the bosses to deal with individual workers effectively, openly and fairly. The union promotes the wellbing of workers. For your education we advise you to start reading about Robert Owen:pioneer of personnel management- and companies like Rowntree.

Tom Tun Wrote:
19/11/2010
Adam Selene,
I did not know that you are a communist or socialist until this comment that you wrote. I even have some doubt that maybe you are an advisor to the Burmese regime. Name a country that doesn't have labour law? If there is a fair and just labour law, why should a country need labour unions?
I know some dirty secrets about Union giving campaign contributions to possible political candidates to support their agendas. If there is central government and a just law, why is there an extra organization? Justice and fairness is the key, not the organization. Organization is to hold collective power. Collective power many times steps over individual freedom and rights.
Burma will choose the path that suits them, may be your way or may be mine. Ask yourself, why is your country's economy tailing China in the 21st century? Do you still have liberal idealogy? I see what is right is right and wrong is wrong. Nothing in between.

Adam Selene Wrote:
18/11/2010
All commenters write about "we should this or that.."

Actually the regime is controlling the game. And their control is more complete than it was ever before. They are playing the NLD and ASSK - both without a feasible strategy - like an instrument.

About the constitution: there are some nasty clauses in there, for sure. But there is stuff in there which is an improvement too. It guarantees freedom of labour organization for example. Actually the attorney general is writing new labour laws now, because the constitution demands that.

If there is freedom of labour organization that is a big step forward. If you look at other unfree countries in the past, upcoming labour movements played a big role in achieving meaningful change.

If Than Shwe so obviously is in charge of the situation, what use is it to antagonize him even further? What didn't work in the past will certainly not work now.

Tom Tun Wrote:
16/11/2010
It is great news that Daw Suu is free at last. However, is she really free? Is Burma heading to the right direction? I think not. Remember,the regime is very clever. Why did the regime release Daw Suu right after election? Releasing international pressure?

On the other hand, what should take place in Burma? (1) Does 2008 constitution serve the interest of Burmese people? (2)Should not we have written the "Rights and Freedom" of Citizens. Only when we have written "Rights and Freedom" can we all be equal under 1 covenant. (3) We should convene "National Convention" or second Penlong meeting that includes all groups in Burma. (4) Based on citizen's "Rights and Freedom" and National Convention results, we should write a new Constitution. Only then will Burma have hope for a positive future. (5) War crimes committed since 1962 must be investigated and the guilty charged according to the international law. If these can happen, Burma will be free.

ludu Wrote:
15/11/2010
Her reappearance in the public touches our soul. The Lady, you are not forgotten by your people. Never, never,........

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
15/11/2010
“Do not lose your heart,” the 65-year-old pro-democracy leader told the crowd at noon on Sunday. “We all have to keep trying to win what we want.”
That's the BATTLE CRY!
The generals believe they have a “mandate” after their proxy, the Union Solidarity and Development Party, won in a landslide.
Like Kim said, "That's all rubbish." I echo.
“I will not only work with my party,” she said. “I want to work with all the people and all pro-democracy forces. We will also work with all people across the world who support and sympathize with us.”
That's a RALLYING CRY.
The military regime would never let that happen as that would be its WATERLOO.
Hence, Than Shwe will OPT for MURDER instead.
He had tried at Depayin and he would again when she travels the country.
“I am willing to talk to Snr-Gen Than Shwe.”
Well, that depends on the monk murderer, of course.
To be honest, he has no answers for Daw Suu.
Hence, he has NO WORDS for the people, much less WORK for them.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.