ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Did the NLD Make a Blunder?
By AUNG ZAW Friday, April 2, 2010


COMMENTS (38)
RECOMMEND (347)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

The decision by Burma’s main opposition party, the National League for Democracy (NLD), not to take part in the election is seen as a political blunder among some diplomats, international observers and former activists inside and outside Burma. They say the NLD missed an opportunity and that the decision was hasty, playing into the hands of the regime.

However, several leading NLD figures defended the decision and told me that there was a fundamental reason not to re-register the party for the coming election. They say the main reason for the decision is the regime’s election law. (See: Suu Kyi Unhappy with Election Law)

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected]

In March, NLD leaders filed a lawsuit against election laws at the supreme court. However, a supreme court official reportedly told the party leaders that the court does not have the power to handle the case, and returned the documents.

In any case, the critics say that Aung San Suu Kyi’s message in late March before the party leaders’ final meeting in Rangoon largely influenced the decision of NLD members and complain that it was unfair.

Two camps formed within the NLD: party Chairman Aung Shwe, and some senior party members favored re-registration, while  leading critic Win Tin, Nyan Win and several other NLD leaders opposed it. The party’s youth wing was also active in opposing the election.

As expected, there were several meetings before the party reached a final decision not to re-register. (See: NLD Divided on Party Registration). At a meeting on March 15, Aung Shwe proposed re-registration but no final decision was reached.

Underlying movement at the grass-roots level in the countryside was meanwhile occurring.

Opposition to the party's re-registration began in Pegu, Magwe and Irrawaddy Divisions, where several leaders openly told exiled media, including The Irrawaddy and the Norway-based Democratic Voice of Burma, that they favored a boycott because of the repressive election law.

Heated discussion meanwhile continued in Rangoon, where rumors surfaced of a split within the party.

Several party leaders came out in opposition to re-registration at a Rangoon meeting on March 23, a strong indication that grass-roots members were playing a major role in shaping the decision.

Then came Suu Kyi's statement, issued through her lawyer Nyan Win, that she would not even think of registering under the unjust election law.

“She wanted party members to know that the party would have no dignity if it registers and participates in the election,” Nyan Win said.

Many inside and outside Burma said Suu Kyi’s message strongly influenced the party’s final decision.

In defense of Suu Kyi, Win Tin told me that even before Suu Kyi came out with her statement, there was consensus among  grassroots NLD and youth members that the party should not re-register for the election.

“But we respect her decision and she is still a powerful voice,” he said. More than 50 per cent of NLD members at the grass-roots level favored shunning the election, he disclosed.

At the party executive meeting on March 27, Aung Shwe and NLD leaders who favored re-registration did not show up. Word came from Aung Shwe's camp, however, that he agreed to Suu Kyi's message and would respect the decision.



1  |  2 | 3 



COMMENTS (38)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Moe Aung Wrote:
13/04/2010
Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF

I reckon you are simply jealous that whereas Ne Win rubbed shoulders with royalty in Britain, all Than Shwe (persona non grata anywhere in the Western world) might claim is the pretensions of Naypyidaw and the rest, perhaps your alleged association with His Maj, another pretender, and the pair of them bound for the asylum.

'Where were their proposed policies and solutions for improving the country and the plight of the people?'

When you face relentless persecution, your activists thrown into prison and tortured, your offices closed down all over the country, with no freedom of speech, this question is little better than a sick joke. Contrast that with the junta in power for the past two decades, and their wonderful achievements for health and education, and particularly (did you say 'compromise'?!) with the ethnic nationalities.

It would be very funny if it weren't so tragic.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
11/04/2010
You Can't Handle The Truth Wrote: 08/04/2010
"NLD. Good riddance. Less talk about this superficial 'political' party, if it can even be called a political party when it can't even handle politics efficiently, and more talk and focus on the plight of the Myanmar people. Basically, ASSK couldn't run for office, so she wanted to disintegrate the NLD. The truth came out finally, the past 20 years it was all just a power struggle for ASSK, instead of a struggle for the people. The NLD's platform included only the 1990 elections, their disagreement with the junta and the Constitution, and the release of ASSK. Where were their proposed policies and solutions for improving the country and the plight of the people? The healthcare system, the education system, the compromise with various ethnic groups, etc."

COMMENT: Absolutely spot on! Thank goodness, we have hope, if the poster is Burmese. We had to put with so much diatribe against the junta by those enthralled to the traitor woman.


Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
08/04/2010
chanlawn Wrote: 07/04/2010

"NLD will survive without registration. The African National Congress (ANC) survived as a non-registered political party for many years. NLD needs to learn from ANC methods how to survive and how to moblize people and democracy movement."

COMMENT: See a donkey for what it is, not as a horse. There are no similarities; South Africa did not have Panglong legacy; it was a pure racist - white supremacist-construct.




n Wrote:
08/04/2010
I don't think it was a blunder. It is a damn if you do damn if you don't situation.

A previous commentor pointed out that NLD lacks strategy and they are merely responding to the Junta calling the shots. That is the reality. This was expected, whatever they decide, they will still fall into a trap.

In the end Burma as a country and us Burmese as a people still loose. I think it is time for a new strategy and new leadership.

Perhaps this time our brothers and sisters in the army will join for the greater good of the country and the people.

I am greatful and believe DASSK has sacrificed enough. The question now is could she still succeed or is it time for her to pass the torch.

You Can't Handle The Truth Wrote:
08/04/2010
NLD. Good riddance. Less talk about this superficial 'political' party, if it can even be called a political party when it can't even handle politics efficiently, and more talk and focus on the plight of the Myanmar people. Basically, ASSK couldn't run for office, so she wanted to disintegrate the NLD. The truth came out finally, the past 20 years it was all just a power struggle for ASSK, instead of a struggle for the people. The NLD's platform included only the 1990 elections, their disagreement with the junta and the Constitution, and the release of ASSK. Where were their proposed policies and solutions for improving the country and the plight of the people? The healthcare system, the education system, the compromise with various ethnic groups, etc.

KKK Wrote:
07/04/2010
It seems to me Aung Zaw is not happy with NLD's decision. Irrawaddy is no less than junta's media. Rubbish, rubbish!

Thandar Wrote:
07/04/2010
For me, it is not right time to criticize or argue about NLD's decision. Nobody knows whether it is the right decision or not at present. History will decide.

But I am sure that it is the best option under the circumstances. NLD has shown their unity and leadership by taking their responsibility.

What our people have to do? What is our people responsibility to achieve our goal? Only thing what we have to do is to surround NLD and follow it's leadership and decisions. That's it.

chanlawn Wrote:
07/04/2010
NLD will survive without registration. The African National Congress (ANC) survived as a non-registered political party for many years. NLD needs to learn from ANC methods how to survive and how to moblize people and democracy movement.

Myanmar patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
07/04/2010
Maung Maung Wrote: 05/04/2010

"Myanmar Patriot 4UMPF is trying to smear the name of the NLD by associating it with the public enemy number 1 BSPP and U Ne Win. SLORC, SPDC and NUP are the progeny of U Ne Win and you cannot hoodwink the people of Burma. Sr-General Than Shwe is a poor imitation of the late General Ne Win.Chips of the same block look alike and act the same whatever the change in name."

Utter rubbish from someone who cannot think outside the box.Fargaung ShuMaung was welcome in London,even invited to Buckingham Palace to dine with the Queen, because he was a colonial slave, whilst killing, torturing and maiming our people with impunity. Come on, wake up and learn real politics.

Sen Gen Herzog Ashin ThanShwe is a visionary. Order of the Peacock will be bestowed upon Lord ThanShwe whether you like it or not. Down with traitors! Up with Myanmars!


Tin Htet Sein Wrote:
06/04/2010
NLD and ASSK were pushed into a corner by the absurdly unjust electoral laws.
A scenario that came to my mind is that of a new prisoner that was placed into the cell of the prison bully. The bully told the new prisoner. "My law is that whoever's in the same cell with me has to give me sexual favors, otherwise I will attack and kill you".

My question to the readers. Which path will you choose.

Fight like a man even if there's a chance that you will die or bend over and will never be able to live with yourself for the rest of your life.

mogyo Wrote:
05/04/2010
Election is set. It is the show business of Junta. The results are set. If junta is not willing to tolerate ethnic armed groups who has limited authority despite their guns, what will you expect from junta without any guns or any other means of leverage.
People in opposition should not waste time talking about elections. Instead they should find ways how to fight the junta by the people.

Maung Maung Wrote:
05/04/2010
Myanmar Patriot 4UMPF is trying to smear the name of the NLD by associating it with the public enemy number 1 BSPP and U Ne Win. SLORC, SPDC and NUP are the progeny of U Ne Win and you cannot hoodwink the people of Burma. Sr-General Than Shwe is a poor imitation of the late General Ne Win.Chips of the same block look alike and act the same whatever the change in name.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
05/04/2010
TSM's comment is most interesting. Could it be that Shu Maung's ex-henchmen are tying to do a Mark 2 BSPP under cover of NLD as the biggest party? The SPDC is for liberalisation of the markets (as advised by our king HM King sShwebomin II) whereas BSPP was for wholesale nationalisation. Khin Nyunt was loyal to Shu Maung. Win Aung was with Khin Nyunt. He had an audience with our king in London before becoming Foreign Minister.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
05/04/2010
Dear Maung Wa Toke, You are broadly right. The old generals in the NLD were Shu Maung's generals, brainless, uneducated and weak. When they were in power, they acted against the people, obeying their thug master Shu Maung.
As for the 1990 election results, have you analysed them in depth? Yes, there was huge bias against the NUP; much as we dislike their parent BSPP, we need to admit our people had voted out, of hatred of BSPP, for the NLD.
SLORC and SPDC ARE A TOTALLY DIFFERENT MATTER.
Our people need education. For the past 40 years education in Burma had hardly been education at all.

Maung Maung Wrote:
05/04/2010
TSM erred.It's not Brigadiers Maung Maung and Aung Shwe that General Ne Win looked to for approval, but Brigadiers Maung Maung and Aung Gyi. You are confused with Burmese names or are you purposely mix it to discredit Ex-Brigadier Aung Shwe, now U Aung Shwe of the NLD?

Garrett Wrote:
05/04/2010
mogyo:"We are slaves and we will soon be voting to say we will willingly serve our masters, in the name of our country, with our lives, blood and what ever they ask for including our dignity. World will be amazed at how stupid these people in a country called Myanmar is. Our children were destined to end up becoming slaves in foreign countries (which seemed a better option) or in so called motherland by so called people who rescued us falling down the gorge."

Ko Ko Htay:"Blaming the victim is an easiest way out. This is what exactly political analysts and pundits do for living. Sitting in air-conditioned rooms, sometimes thousand miles far away from the field, they produce one story after another scratching their smart brains with no guts, no representation and of course no responsibility."

Hear! Hear!

These comments & the comments like those of Moe Aung are what the citizens of Burma need to be reading.

There is strength in numbers, so unite, organize,& prepare to free Burma!

Maung Wa Toke Wrote:
04/04/2010
It was unfortunate that NLD do not survive to work with people toward democracy. But it was their best choice.

They know instinctively that they cannot do better. It is an irony that NLD do not care much about the people. They only care about themselves and stay irrelevant during many past crisis. They still ignore about ethnic issues or people's plight in economic crisis. They don't even care much about democracy but only for their survival, and 1990 election result.

Generals at NLD had never offend generals at SPDC during their reign. They always comply SPDC's wishes, and ready to kick out everyone from NLD, including Daw ASSK. Even if NLD survive, it will be a disgrace for the democratic movement. If there were another big crisis in the people or ethnic area, they will stay away from it, and try to appease the SPDC, as during saffron revolution or white shirt movement. But in Nargis, they did participate, after everyone else were arrested, and funds went their way.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
04/04/2010
NLD made a blunder? It is their specialty. To begin with, they have no intelligence to understand that the woman is a traitor, or strength of character to stand up to colonialists and imperialists doing their damnest best to foist the traitor woman upon us.

Anyone with more than two brain cells can understand that we will never accept the traitor woman in any political capacity. It is not just SPDC that rejects her; all Burmese/Myanmars who have seen the light reject her too.

Rest is just academic.

TSM Wrote:
04/04/2010
"Whenever there was a CO meeting (Commanding Officers’ meeting), General Ne Win, as chairman of all the CO’s meetings, looked to the two officers (Maung Maung and Aung Shwe) for approval. What they didn’t approve could not be carried out."

I don't understand why Ne Win's yes-man has been leading NLD? Anyone has any idea?

TSM

Eric Johnston Wrote:
04/04/2010
"The NLD decision not to stand ... has created something of a dilemma for [Western Governments], because a focus of their support inside Burma may soon disappear."

The focus of support of Western Governments inside Burma has been the NLD because it won the last elections by not merely a majority but by a landslide. Could Western Governments continue as before if the NLD participated in the forthcoming elections but won no seats? Even if claiming the elections to be rigged, it would seem to be stretching a point to continue to regard the NLD as the legitimate representative of the people in such circumstances.

Some may regard the elections as genuine, but numerous are they who see the 7-point road map, the national convention, the constitution, the referendum, and now the elections as a massive and not very successful hoax.

Moe Aung Wrote:
04/04/2010
Derek Tonkin

'If the NLD no longer exists, what is the US to do?'

The US can continue to focus on engagement and work toward:

1.the release of ASSK and political prisoners

2.dialogue and national reconciliation between the junta and opposition groups, both Burman and ethnic, some 'illegal' such as the KNU as well as the ceasefire groups

3.inclusive (including freed political prisoners as well as independent candidates) free and fair elections

The NLD may cease to exist, but ASSK and the rest in prison do not; they continue to languish in custody. The polling still needs international oversight and scrutiny, or it's going to be another dazzling show of black magic as usual.

Or the US can take a running jump, if it feels the junta now wins fair and square by default, so it's time to give the business lobby the green light.

Myanmar patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
04/04/2010
Derek Tonkin Wrote: 03/04/2010

"The NLD decision not to stand in the elections has been neither welcomed nor criticized by Western Governments, who have without exception said that they respect their decision." THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT WE WANT!

We will sort out our problems by ourselves democratically.

We do not approve of washing dirty lines in public.

We will endeavour to protect the honour of Burma; we are a sovereign state.

Free Man Wrote:
03/04/2010
Very good to read the article. Did the NLD make a blunder? I don't think at all. In fact, if the NLD had registered, it would not only tarnish its political image but also make its allies, especially non-Burman ethnic forces, feel badly betrayed. One can imagine what would happen to the future of our country with a long history of conflicts and broken promises in this context.

Therefore, stop getting excited about this upcoming election and the undemocratic constitution drawn up by the men handpicked by the SPDC for the SPDC at the sham NC. If Bo Than Shwe seriously cared about the people and the country, he would have done things in a totally different way in the first place. So, let's think about what to do next.

Adam Selene Wrote:
03/04/2010
Timothy is right: the NLD should've registered without dropping any members. The law offered this opportunity. It would've forced the regime to say that they wanted the NLD out of the process and the election, instead of the NLD saying "no" and looking like an unwilling party only interested in the "dignity" of its leaders.

I agree with Soe Thane also. The biggest problem of the NLD is not having a strategy and a programme. Personally I favoured the NLD competing in the elections and trying to make the most of the space that is offered.

But if the NLD would've had a real and sensible alternative (strategy), with a real chance of succeeding, I would've supported that.

Sadly the NLD is not a constructive political force. It's hollow and only reacting to steps taken by the junta. They should've made the regime react to THEIR smart moves years ago. They should've caught the junta with its pants down.

Well, what can one expect of a party led by elderly people...

mogyo Wrote:
03/04/2010
People will be coerced to vote in elections as they were in approval of constitution. And all the votes will go for the candidates decided to be won by regime regardless of how people vote or how many people vote. The regime's candidates will win the majority votes.

It is how we enjoyed the elections ever since General Ne Win took over in 1962.

Next election will be the same.

We are slaves and we will soon be voting to say we will willingly serve our masters, in the name of our country, with our lives, blood and what ever they ask for including our dignity. World will be amazed at how stupid these people in a country called Myanmar is. Our children were destined to end up becoming slaves in foreign countries (which seemed a better option) or in so called motherland by so called people who rescued us falling down the gorge.

Thank you NLD for preserving our dignity. If NLD is for people, it will survive.

If NLD is for its leaders (as it is in an organisation) , its soul will die

Ko Ko Htay Wrote:
03/04/2010
They would lament that it has played into junta hands by registering the party.
Today’s Burma is not on the road to democracy. Not even by lowest benchmarks. Therefore don’t blame the victim for holding principles high while itself is falling down on its knees. A tiger would rather die to eat grass, yet its remains will still be the source of potency in many ways.

Ko Ko Htay Wrote:
03/04/2010
Blaming the victim is an easiest way out. This is what exactly political analysts and pundits do for living. Sitting in air-conditioned rooms, sometimes thousand miles far away from the field, they produce one story after another scratching their smart brains with no guts, no representation and of course no responsibility.

In this so called post decision analysis, they have just granted an assumption for themselves that people on the street will still cheer up support for NLD should the party say YES to go ahead with registration.

Contrary to their nicely painted scenario, radicals within the party would leave the course and take matters in their own hand while others would say “we would rather support USDA since NLD betrays the people”, and a peaceful democracy movement for more than 20 years will become under siege, bearing attacks from both left and right.

And again, analysts would decry that NLD leadership has made the blunder by dividing the party.

Soe Thane Wrote:
03/04/2010
The problem is not that the NLD decided not to take part in the elections.

The problem is the NLD has not strategy.

They are only reacting to what the junta does. And they have done this for 20 years with no effect.

A decision to join or not to join could be correct within a realistic strategy.

But where is the strategy? No where.

Calling for dialogue and then being disappointed is not a strategy. Calling for a review of the constitution and then being angry when it doesn't happen is not a strategy. Waiting for the election laws and then being angry when the force the party into a corner is not a strategy. It's being unimaginative and lacking in leadership. It's time to call a spade a spade. ASSK has let the country down.

Nyunt Shwe Wrote:
03/04/2010
I'm sure NLD's decision was unwise, irresponsible, and frankly put, madness. The party, Aung San Suu Kyi, U Win Tin led hardliners must take the responsibility for this action.

Expecting a democratic election under strong and resourceful military regime is too naive and there was no such election in the world history. NLD abuses the people with her popularity basically Suu being our beloved and revered her father Aung San and Western countries' media manipulation plus several awards.

Moe Aung Wrote:
03/04/2010
Than Shwe's celebration may well be premature, if people choose to vote with their feet by staying indoors on polling day. Spread the word quietly, and popular support for an all out boycott seems more than likely with anti-regime feelings running high at this juncture.

What would the junta do if turnout dwindles to a mere trickle? Frogmarch people everywhere to the polling stations? There's still the option of voting for whoever stands against the junta's proxies, or simply spoiling or losing the ballot paper.

Then the authorities will resort to blatant cheating as usual. The NLD on its part has plausible deniability; all it did was not re-register. If allowed to disband itself without further persecution, it can re-form into civil society groups in order to maintain its organizational network and influence.

The sham elections will of course go ahead in the face of ridicule and censure from the international community which will continue to insist on the release of political prisoners.

timothy Wrote:
03/04/2010
I had wished NLD would register for election without dropping or discarding any imprisoned members including Daw Suu. Is it possible? The junta do not recognize NLD who carries the like of Daw Suu and jailed leaders. It is obvious in 2008 constitution and recently announced election laws. So NLD got no option but to boycott the election. There is no such thing as dreaming along the line of Than Shwe`s tactical cruelty. He had successfully weather the international outcries of his heavy-handedness. Next step is to counter the threat of thuggish troops sent to force the closures of NLD. People revolution is inevitable. War between ethnic forces and fascist junta troops are inevitable. Than Shwe is seeking sanctuary for his family in Vietnam if the liberation revolutionary forces invade Naypyidaw to capture him. Who said that Than Shwe is celebrating. He must be so stupid to do it.

Derek Tonkin Wrote:
03/04/2010
The NLD decision not to stand in the elections has been neither welcomed nor criticized by Western Governments, who have without exception said that they respect their decision. But it has created something of a dilemma for them, because a focus of their support inside Burma may soon disappear. The recent Asian Society Task Force Report presented as its first recommendation that: "The National League for Democracy should continue to be a focal point of US policy support……." If the NLD no longer exists, what is the US to do?

This raises an interesting question of diplomatic practice, because since the demise of communism in Eastern Europe, diplomatic missions have increasingly asserted their right to support human rights activists in the country to which they are accredited as activity not incompatible with diplomatic practice. However, at the end of the day, any country can declare a diplomat "persona non grata" without the need to give any reason.

A.M.O Wrote:
02/04/2010
Than Shwe is a thug (ref: Colin Powell's term for him, as self-confessed mastermind of Depayin massacre); no doubt about it.

As he is a thug, he had drawn up 2010 electoral laws on his own terms to marginalize ASSK & to keep NLD at bay during this election; regardless of credibility or controversy which a thug like him won't care.

From 2008 (rigged) referendum to 2010 electoral process(road map), he is putting a lot of efforts copying his boss(Ne Win)'s steps(like in 1974) to legitimize his rule (shall we say '2010' as-'old wine in a new bottle').

But he is so adamant that he didn't know he is 'repeating the same history' of Ne Win, which will lead him to that of Ne Win's
ungracious end('88).

But NLD's refusal to dance to the tune played by Than Shwe could be a 'blessing in disguise'.

You know why?

Once a thug, always a thug; and he's got the gun.

Chit Thein Than Wrote:
02/04/2010
I'm sure the NLD did not make a blunder by deciding not to register because:

(1) The status of the NLD will not change except that it has to expel their leader ASSK and those in prison

(2) The elected members of this election cannot change anything except that they must approve whatever the SPDC wishes to do meaning to legitimize its rule and wrongful and criminal acts

(3) The NLD must repudiate its Shwegondaing Declaration calling for the recognition of 1990 election results among others

(4) By agreeing to re-register and contest election it has to support the 2008 constitution and accept the unjust electoral laws

(5) By not registering NLD can continue as of now. Maybe there may come more oppression.

Tettoe Aung Wrote:
02/04/2010
Before it even begins, the game is rigged, most of the opposition players are being issued a 'red card' and disqualified, the referee is not going to be fair either, so to ask a question that the NLD's decision not to contest the election a blunder, does it seems fair? I think not. There's a saying in this situation - you cannot lose if you don't play!

Kyaik-ka-san Wrote:
02/04/2010
Illegitimate ID has haunted killer Than Shwe for 20 years. He hasn’t had a single peaceful day because he committed so many crimes. 1990 experience showed that fair contest doesn’t help in beating DASSK. Therefore, he planned to apply every possible wicked method to LEGITIMIZE the election.

(1) Play US card – Use direct talk to justify the flawed election.

(2) Unfair law – Block Oppositions taking part the contest. It also aimed at demolishing NLD Party.

(3) Allow reopen of offices at the last moment- Show fairness but aiming mainly to create NLD members’ demand for registration.

(4) “Hidden” unfriendly members openly pressed for taking part in the poll. If so, NLD showed agreeing with 25% Constitution; it will be in great dilemma also.

(5) Once it declared registration, TS already achieved his aim, the LEGITIMACY. For NLD, there are hurdles waiting and unlikely pass the final validation by the wicked commission.

NLD has done its homework well at this phase.

Mg Myanmar Wrote:
02/04/2010
Thanks Ko Aung Zaw. It is really good to read.
I believe the main reason why many NLD members opposing the re-registration is TRUST. We don't trust Aung Shwe and his camp. I give them enough time, 20 years, in driver seat to lead us to democracy.

Thura Wrote:
02/04/2010
Fully agree with Ko Aung Zaw. This is exactly the best scenario for the junta.

I think one of the junta's intentions to release U Win Tin and U Tin Oo was to lead to this decision. Their strong comments inspired a lot of young party members and reinforced the NLD's confrontational stance even before Daw Suu expressed her views on the election.

My wishful scenario going forward is:

- After losing the legal organization, Daw Suu, U Tin Oo, U Win Tin, etc. remain as icons of democracy and continue to fight for democracy but not as the main political force as it is now.
- Some senior NLD members set up a new party, work together with other democratic groups and become a significant force in parliaments.
- The new forces try to improve the daily lives of ordinary Burmese people to the extent possible even if we cannot get real democracy.
- Political prisoners are released soon after the election and western countries relax their sanctions against Burma.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.