ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Hypocrisy Replaces Hope after the NLD Decision
By AUNG ZAW Wednesday, March 31, 2010


COMMENTS (22)
RECOMMEND (343)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

There's no shortage of hypocrites when Burma's the subject, and recent events have given them ample room on the world stage.

The show started in New York, where UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Friday that the military junta's efforts to make the upcoming election inclusive, free and fair were “frustrating” and “disappointing.”

How many times has he expressed this frustration and disappointment? In 2009, Ban claimed that he had a good meeting with junta leader Snr-Gen Than Shwe in Naypyidaw, receiving from the general a promise that the election would be free and fair.

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected]

Ban urged Than Shwe to free all political prisoners but the general refused to listen. Ban now says he respects the decision of the National League for Democracy (NLD) not to take part in the election.

The US, a vocal critic of the repressive regime, followed suit.
 
At the Washington headquarters of the US State Department, Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs P J Crowley said the Obama administration respects the NLD’s decision.

Responding to a press briefing question, Crowley said: “That was a decision for the NLD to make, and we think it’s regrettable that this is a reflection of the unwillingness of the government in Burma to take what we thought were the necessary steps to open up the political process and to engage in serious dialogue with not only key figures like Aung San Suu Kyi, her political movement, others, as well as the various ethnic groups that want to have a say in Burma’s future.”

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who once called Suu Kyi a friend and declared he was “saddened and angry” at the “monstrous” sentencing of Suu Kyi last year, added his voice, saying: “Sadly, the Burmese regime has squandered the opportunity for national reconciliation.”

He then added, “Aung San Suu Kyi must be allowed to take her rightful place at the heart of Burmese politics.”

Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith told ABC Radio: “I don't believe that any election without the National League for Democracy can be a full, free and fair election”.

Smith said the new election law made it difficult, if not impossible, for the NLD to take part in the election with Nobel Peace laureate Suu Kyi as its leader.

“Unless something fundamental or substantial changes, regrettably I think it does put paid to what slim prospects we had, hopeful prospects we had earlier this year that we might make some progress on the democracy front in Burma,” Smith said.

For its part, Japan is due to raise Burma’s current political situation  on the sidelines of the G-8 foreign ministerial meeting in Canada, which kicks off on Monday.

The Tokyo government, one of Burma’s largest donors, warned that it would not expand its economic aid to Burma if Suu Kyi is barred from the election. That's an interesting stand in view of the well known fact that senior Japanese diplomats usually accuse Suu Kyi in private of being stubborn and uncompromising.

Meanwhile, Indonesia's foreign minister plans a trip to Burma to discuss the party registration law and the planned election. It's safe to predict that he will leave Burma empty handed.

In Singapore, whose government is a staunch supporter of the pariah regime in Burma, a foreign ministry spokesman said: “We are disappointed that the new election laws have led to this result. This will make it harder for national reconciliation to be achieved.”

The spokesman added: “We have always held that national reconciliation among the stakeholders is a critical element for the legitimacy of the elections. This would require the participation of the National League for Democracy and other political parties. It is still not too late for all parties to reach a compromise and we urge them to do so.”

I am sure that both Than Shwe and Suu Kyi are fully aware of who are friends and foes in the international arena.

They both always compete to win friends, as well as hypocrites, saviors and experts who would have difficulty even pronouncing the names of  Suu Kyi and Than Shwe correctly, let alone possess any command of Burmese language.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (22)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Myanmar patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
07/04/2010
Tide, Keep up the good work! We will do our best to make the whole world understand the real Burma.

Tide Wrote:
06/04/2010
Sorry mate - Okkar!

I might have missed your points. I guess all I wanted to say was focus on the topic and don't let ourselves become like Suu Kyi's admirers.

Than Shwe might be a bad guy in the eyes of millions, but at least he has been doing lots of good stuff especially infrastructures across the country. And Suu Kyi just sits and sulks. Why can't people understand the fact that the power is not in the hands of Than Shwe nor Maung Aye? What the military regime is doing is all about team work; they are not like former Ne Win's socialists. They are not like former regimes at all. What they are doing now is implementing U Nu's vision (to some extent) plus the real politics. They are not destroying Suu Kyi's centre politics; they are just trying to take off the country to another level - that's it. Aung San used to use the slogan "Burmese's opportunity arises when English faces difficulty". That shows how much Aung San lacks vision and strategies. Like father like daughter!
Cheers!

Garrett Wrote:
05/04/2010
I am a bit put-off when I read an article pointing out "hypocrisy" by the countries who have been trying to work on behalf of the Burmese people to help them do what they have barely raised a finger to do for two decades.

No countries such as the United States, Great Britain, or Australia are bound by law to help the Burmese people deal with the corrupt SPDC. Yet these countries often do more for the citizens of Burma than the citizens do for themselves.

However, the United Nations is altogether worthy of being labled hypocritical due to its lack of taking the necessary steps to protect the Burmese people from an illegitimate regime which takes advantage of the UN's weaknesses to continue gleefully raping Burma.

The time for blaming others is over.

This is it, the time for the Burmese people to unite for freedom, and prepare for democracy when the SPDC falls.

No anarchy, no looting, no kangaroo courts.

Ask the world for its help ousting the SPDC, not to do it for you!

Myanamr patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
04/04/2010
What percentage of elegible voters turned out at US elections, or at any Western election?

Gaining power by abstaining?
Well, that is genius!

KKK Wrote:
03/04/2010
One of the Burmese weaknesses is personal attack on each other.

Moe Aung Wrote:
02/04/2010
Hypocrisy, in other words double standards, has been the norm in a good deal of politics and much of diplomacy as both are based on group interests. It's just dressed up in jargon laced with platitudes and lip service to justify one's limitations as well as one's real agenda. It is indeed a part of statecraft.

One step back, two steps forward:

If the NLD can muster popular support for a mass boycott of the polls nationwide, that's the right strategy to employ. It needs only to spread the word 'unofficially', and it can maintain 'plausible deniability'. No protest marches, no banners. People simply need to stay in on the day. The NLD can still expect a crackdown if it does nothing anyway.

Whether people not turning up or being frogmarched to the polling stations but voting for anyone but the junta's proxies, the SPDC can only cheat the way it did in the sham referendum. And once again it becomes the laughing stock before the entire world. Legitimacy?! Time for the NLD to up the ante.

Kyaw Wrote:
02/04/2010
The NLD ignored the "big picture in Burmese politics and the important role it has to play in helping to transform the country towards a democracy," a senior official of a Southeast Asian country told IPS. "Democracy is a process, not a morality play."

Okkar Wrote:
02/04/2010
Tide,

I was merely pointing out the hypocrisy in his article because it was like the pot calling the kettle black. In case you missed the point, I was actually discussing the content of his article, where he ridicules others for their lack of command of the Burmese language and being unable to pronounce Su Kyi's name correctly.
That in itself is hypocrisy, since Mr. Aung Zaw himself can barely speak English let alone getting correct pronounciation on anything.

Tide Wrote:
02/04/2010
Okkar!

I for sure do not agree with Aung Zaw's ideas and arguments.

But - come on - this is not a place to attack his weakness in language. After all, this is not even your business, and that shows how low you are. You have every right to discuss his article, though.

myichi tarheel Wrote:
02/04/2010
I don't think Daw Suu and NLD made this decision to win favor from anybody abroad. I believe they did it in reflection on the developing situation, which in a broader sense would not in anyway help the people and country of Burma, but pepetuate the agony in the abyss of tyranny.

MW Wrote:
01/04/2010
We all are sad with the NLD's decision. Anyone who truly loves the country is. Stepping in NLD's shoes would find that they are all sad, too. But we should be happy/proud that the NLD has made such a right decision unanimously. And which is noble and needs support - doing the right thing with saddened, heavy heart or doing the wrong thing joyously? So for those whose conscience are clear they truly love their country and the people please check "yes..but" at this time of critical moments in history.
After all most of us who read/write in this page are not at the core of this painful decision mechanism nor the actions that definitely follow suit. Probably not even inside the country that we loudly love. Moral is what we really possess and moral support is what we can unwaveringly offer. Never doubt that this is the force that moves the mountain. A country has the government it deserves. What we have deserved we all have now. What we will deserve is around the corner.

Kyaik-ka-san Wrote:
01/04/2010
Politically, a friend indeed doesn’t necessarily be a savior. As long as there's a stand with justice, hypocrisy or even an enemy can be convinced and turned into a friend. A person with principle and morality is a friend. In other words, an evil person like Than Shwe is dangerous to Burmese people.

Thanks to the NLD’s concerted efforts, many drifting governments are become supportive and friendly countries, because these countries are governed by leaders that possess basic international norms of human rights and prosperity.

Crimes committed by the junta are multiplied with respect to time scale and are not acceptable by human society. The evil acts compounded with endless bullying of TS caused difficulty for neighbors, including China, to accept their policy.

Mr. Ban of the UN gave a most relevant fact that TS has promised him to cooperate with the UN. The junta never showed cooperation but always acted against the UN, he said. Over time, dirty tricks played by TS made all fed up.

The NLD has earned great hope for Burma.

Thura Wrote:
01/04/2010
For this decision, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi will be admired more by a lot of people around the world for her strong beliefs, her morality, her persistent defiance against the junta. She will surely be recorded as a great figure in history.

However, what will happen to most of her party members? Without a legal party platform, their activities will be very limited and will be much less effective going forward. They will finally lose an opportunity to play effective roles in politics.

How about the impact on the people? Obviously, there will be an election and a junta-backed party will win the election. Moreover, there won't be a strong opposition in the parliments although a strong opposition in parliament is really needed for check-and-balance. On the other hand, the sactions are likely remain and the deadlock will continue for more decades.

Although I admire Daw Suu much, I have to say she is not the solution and she is rather a part of the problems.

Thura Wrote:
01/04/2010
I was really sad about Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's decision not to register the party for 2010 election. From morality perspectives, it may be right but I do not see any workable future strategy on the NLD's side.

Will she continue to rely on pressure/sactions from international community? The past two decades have proved that this won't solve the problems.

Will she try to create mass demostrations to challenge the junta or the new government? Although people hate the junta a lot, most are not ready to risk their lives for a change in Burma and they care more about their daily lives. Moreover, the junta is very well-experienced in oppressing such demonstrations.

myichi tarheel Wrote:
01/04/2010
Dear Editor,
In refuting your article, I don't see hypocrisy but consistency and frustrations. The UN has been pushing towards an inclusive free and fair election all along, but when the announcement of the unfair election law was made, they knew what this was leading into and thus the frustration.
The West similarly has the same goal, with a different approach by the US also ending up in frustrations.
China, whose intention is to suck the blood out of Burma until the last drop, is also consistent, too, in supporting the junta no matter what it's doing.
Japan and Asean countries using covert and overt support for the junta, in the hope of a change for better are frustrated.
I used to have a great respect for The Irrawady for its unbiased and clear presentations of the truth, but now I'm a little disappointed.
I wonder what could have fogged the eyes of our dear chief editor?

Moe Aung Wrote:
01/04/2010
In the absence of any concrete measures forthcoming from the international community, the sham elections will take place just as the sham national convention did without the NLD. After all it's going to be a defining moment and a crucial milestone on the roadmap of the junta in its bid for legitimacy, in other words a new lease of life.

Whether the NLD can transform into a mass organization, like the USDA which is going in the opposite direction, and continue to operate in the local communities is questionable. If the feasibility of a nationwide mass boycott of the polls is in doubt, it can only reorganize in the form of a number of loose civil society groups, rather like the YMBA in colonial times, so it can fight another day following a strategic retreat. It certainly cannot voice its opinions on political matters, let alone pursue openly political goals in this form.

ASSK's detractors are having a field day for now. Their unashamed glee however will be short-lived.

SAM Wrote:
01/04/2010
"They both always compete to win friends, as well as hypocrites, saviors and experts who would have difficulty even pronouncing the names of Suu Kyi and Than Shwe correctly, let alone possess any command of Burmese language."

Well said!

Now let's see what those "experts" have to say and do, and how those righteous "saviours" aim to support a healthy and disciplined transition towards "democracy".

I can't help but think of General Ne Win's "The Burmese way to Socialism"...

This new system seems to be Sr. Gen. Than Shwe's "Myanmar's path to Democracy."

The former gave us over two decades of isolation, oppression and poverty.

Would this new system add on decades of continuous oppression, disempowerment and poverty to the previous 22 years (1988-2010)?

Quite likely, if we leave things as they are.

Nang Wrote:
31/03/2010
Yes, I have the same opinion like you. If not taking the opportunity now, how many years do we have to wait again?

The NLD's decision not to take part in the election is definitely falling under Than Shew's script. Instead of complaining and keep resisting, why don't we work for change bit by bit, with the little opportunity we have in hand.

I am disappointed and sad with the NLD's decision. We should not respond to violence with anger, but with rational calculation.


A deeply disappointed person Wrote:
31/03/2010
Thanks for exposing the hypocrites from both sides of the world.

Nyunt Han Wrote:
31/03/2010
When will this re-play of the same old record over and over again by the Western world stop before substansive actions are initiated ?

Okkar Wrote:
31/03/2010
Dear Aung Zaw,

Possessing any command of a particular language does not make you an expert. How hypocritical of you to say such things after your inability to cope with speaking English during the Al Jazzeera interview on TV.

Hypocrisy of self proclaimed saviours of Burma knows no bound and this is the perfect example of it. Having seen you struggling to cope with speaking English, there's little wonder in who is actually editing the contents of Irrawaddy English edition.

Dear Aung Zaw, perhaps you should learn to possess a command of the English language, if you want to be taken seriously!

timothy Wrote:
31/03/2010
Than Shwe can not get all the thing he wants in this law of Karma. He thinks he got rid of Daw Suu and NLD out of the political picture he likes to see and enjoy fully. People will give hima mass boycott on election day to desert the streets and polling stations.
You can force the people to come to voting circus stations but it will be under the watchful eyes of global citizens and on youtube, facebook and twitters. Every move now on will be under global spotlight. You can not get all the things you wants. You are not a 1 year old child any more. Grow up. Get education.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.