ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Suu Kyi Gives Than Shwe a Smart Sidekick
By AUNG ZAW Thursday, March 25, 2010


COMMENTS (26)
RECOMMEND (367)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Snr Gen Than Shwe is known to be fan of Chinese Sholin martial art movies. Burma's opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, on the other hand, reads books on philosophy and works of world literature—but she has just delivered the junta leader a sidekick worthy of a kung fu master.

According to her lawyer Nyan Win, “Suu Kyi would not even think of registering under these unjust [election] laws.” This probably means that leaders of Burma's main opposition party, the National League for Democracy [NLD], will decide not to contest the planned general election.

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at [email protected]

Earlier, Suu Kyi expressed her unhappiness with the election laws, saying they are unfair because they excluded her and other political prisoners.  According to Nyan Win, “She said she did not think the regime would release such a terrible law.”

Indeed, the election (or “the only game in town”) is in jeopardy as Suu Kyi's powerful message will influence many faithful members in her party and beyond. Many ordinary Burmese who despise the generals and have little faith in the coming election and the repressive election laws are likely to support Suu Kyi's stance.

Her message indicates that Suu Kyi wants to make her stance vis-a-vis the election laws and the planned election crystal clear to regional governments and the international community.

Suu Kyi knows well that the member governments of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are divided on the issue. The foreign minister of  Indonesia is to visit Burma shortly to discuss the election laws with the regime.

Suu Kyi is also aware that the US administration and other western governments are closely watching developments within Burma and are keen to know the intentions of Suu Kyi and her NLD.

On the domestic front, Suu Kyi's message was aimed in two directions. One target was those NLD leaders who want the party to contest the election; the other was her captors.

The NLD itself faces a split and could divide into two main groups—pro-election and anti-election. Party chairman Aung Shwe and Dr Than Nyein are known to favor participation in the election. Deputy chairman Tin Oo and Win Tin head a number of NLD leaders who oppose the unjust election laws and participation in the election.

Nyan Win, told The Irrawaddy that his client had been considering her political future and strategy and had been following the international dimension of what was occurring in Burma.

So what is the NLD's future if the party refuses to register for the election? Will the regime outlaw the party or clamp down on its members? If it does so, will the NLD become an underground party?

The NLD has never been able to function as a legal opposition party in the past and Suu Kyi and like-minded party leaders who wanted to oppose the unjust election laws will have a  new strategy to keep the  party and movement together. 

Burma watchers say the NLD could become a kind of social movement rather than a legal political party. This week, Suu Kyi reportedly told her lawyers that if the imprisoned former student leader Min Ko Naing could fight for democracy in Burma without a political “signpost” she could do the same.

Charismatic Min Ko Naing and several student activists of the “88 Generation Students” group were arrested in 2007 and sentenced to long prison terms.

Knowing full well that the regime leaders will prevent her anyway from taking part in politics in Burma, the Nobel Peace Laureate replied by snubbing the election and election laws.

Perhaps Than Shwe's next step is to drive divisions deeper within the NLD and welcome disgruntled defectors to take part in the election.

But what about Suu Kyi, hardcore members of her party and her other  supporters? The strife will undoubtedly continue. It could indeed prove endless—and endlessly confrontational.



COMMENTS (26)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Saw Dennis Wrote:
02/04/2010
There are many kinds of politics. However, in Burma now, the most crucial kind is not party politics, because TS and his predecessors have made it impossible for the people to have any chance. Most of the ethnic minority groups has decided long ago that it is not worth the paper it is written on. I am not surprised that the NLD has decided not to participate in a game the outcome of which will be entirely useless or damaging for the interest of the people.

Ko Ko Linn Wrote:
02/04/2010
The decision of not taking a part in the sham election is the right one.

We have to consider seriously about Suu Kyi's security from now. The junta has a dirty idea to kill her then their political future will be clear. Will general people be able to take reponsibility for her security?? I think we should start a campaign regarding her life security by pursuing any of the powerful nation to take her security.

Sincerely,
Ko Ko Linn

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
01/04/2010
"Burma's opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, on the other hand, reads books on philosophy and works of world literature—" Really? Where did the books come from? Dredged from the Inya lake? A mere BA degree (PPE) from Oxford is not reaally a great intellectual achievment; there are hundreds of thousands of them. True. If she knows so much philosophy, why does she turn blind eye to 'raison d'etat' in favour of her most selfish interest:lust for power.
Herzog Senior General ThanShwe practises 'raison d'etat' instinctively; for that he is REGENT! Ashin ThanShwe of Pyinmana.

Plan B Wrote:
31/03/2010
My apology, Ko Aung Zaw.

Your are absolutely right after all.

By advising against participation/registering DASSK has highlighted the unrepentant SPDC going ahead with the Sham Election, which she would not be a part of.

How ever even more important ramification is:
By this decision she has "effected the end of NLD".

Thus clearing the way for an absolutely necessary US engagement that HR 2330 has prohibited.

The ultimate sacrifice indeed !

Now everything that effected the citizenry negatively will be the absolute fault of SPDC when US finally has a free hand to engage SPDC and call it bluff.

Kudos to DASSK for her sacrifice and foresight.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
30/03/2010
We have a very important message from our king HM King Shwebomin II. All those members of the NLD who want to participate in the general election should form a new breakaway party and register without delay.
Next they must produce a manifesto, with clear politics, and start campaigning. They can ask U Aung San Oo to lead them. Why not?
The new party can call itself the Myanmar Democratic Party (MDP). What would be their economic and social ideology? How captitalistic or socialistic will it be?
We would also like to see a Myanmar Monarchist Democratic Party (MMDP).Why not? If people accept it, then it is democracy.
We can even have Communist League. (They can hang themselves).

K Wrote:
29/03/2010
Suu Kyi Gives Than Shwe a Smart Sidekick. In return, she gets a 18 months house arrest that turns the NLD into a headless rattle snake.

Ka Nyaw Wrote:
28/03/2010
The first thing to keep in mind about the Burmese election is its crediblity. Would the junta hand over power if they lose? The possibility is very slim. The people of Burma should boycott this sham election by voting against the military.

plan B Wrote:
28/03/2010
Please
Ko Aung Zaw
Do not compare anything of DASSK with Min Ko Naing.
One is in Insein the other is not.
That alone should suffice the present empty bravado being espoused.

Su Wrote:
27/03/2010
Whatever DASSK said, most of NLD member want to register their party. Politics without a party--what will NLD members do? What?

SWEE Wrote:
27/03/2010
People can make a million opinion with little meaning. It is not the time to wait and see what will happened. It is the time to unite and fight. In the world whoever possesses big gun is God today. So take up guns to wipe out TS. That the only option.

plan B Wrote:
27/03/2010
I beg to differ.

Ko Aung Zaw your spin to make DASSK decision look reasonable is admirable.

By not participating:
She clearly has chosen the status quo.
Status quo?

1) Continue to espouse foreign proven useless influence that has eroded her status among the silent majority within and without.

2) Relying on the now useless legitimacy guarantee by none other than US HR 2330 which will prove to be her destiny to eventual oblivion.

3) Using her personal popularity among the less informed western supporter to goad SPDC into being SPDC without recourse.

A lot has been written for her participation with possible stipulations that can be made through appropriate back door diplomacy.
Yet here we are a beloved one has chosen to maintain a foolish stance not unlike her missteps she and NLD chose right after the land slide victory.

Does DASSK clearly explain or state how her non participation or rather obstructionist stance benefit the future of Myanmar citizenry with all the mention status quo?

Tom Tun Wrote:
27/03/2010
I remember a piece of history. Caesar once calculated carefully for his winning situation over Pompey. To make war with Pompey, Caesar offer the terms that Pompey could not accept and Caesar got his war. Caesar also made his war legitimate by also breaking the worse possible law of Rome. which is crossing Rubicon with his army and entering Rome with arms.

Now Than Shwe is doing some what similar one with Caesar. Whether the world will legitimize him is still unclear. First, Ban Ki Moon is running for cover already. No one know how friendly the opinion of so called " Friends of Burma". One things is definitely sure, SPDC has no brain to understand good side of Democracy, Freedom and Peace.

Kyaik-ka-san Wrote:
26/03/2010
DASSK objected the registration that received overwhelm supports. Key national stakeholders and international communities accepted the objection. It is regarded as necessary and a right decision. Ban also agreed with it.

For his own and family survival, Than Shwe has never ever considered for national interest. He pushed forward immoral dirty game this time despite he knew well it would be called off prematurely. Instead of assisting, China pushed Burmese people into the vortex of suffering.

Once his dirty electoral law is crushed, TS does not hesitate to victimize thousands of ethnic minorities’ lives, by attacking KIO and/or UWSA and other ceased fire groups. This is the way he planned to cover up his failure and show excuse of postponing the election.

Applying strategy of “killing own son” is not a new story in Chinese history. It was probably discussed to act so similar to Kokang, during visiting of its several missions.

Even if so, TS will not escape punishment which he deserved.

Kyaik-ka-san Wrote:
26/03/2010
Beside the sidekick, a stick is ready for nailing. Yet, the latter is not the last tool. If Than Shwe is going to hang on unjustifiably, then it is time for 15 key nations to support and act together with the UN, as the Japanese Ambassador told reporters after the UN Forum.
In addition, it is believed opposition camps have prepared several options that may end the junta’s dirty game.

It is widely discussed about time to investigate TS’s committed war crimes, though China thought she may disturb the action.
How can China defend junta from crimes such as Nargis and Depayin killings? As a future superpower, how can China agree to and support the junta’s illegal performance?
At least, China has to show principles matter and that they are against the junta’s immorality.

TS’s continuous and stubborn destiny does not serve national interest. It may destroy social safety network in Burma. Therefore, the Opposition group may decide abandoning SPDC and built people’s own nation at any cost, if this is the only choice.

Aye Myint Wrote:
26/03/2010
From my personal view, even though the election will not be perfectly free or fair (one way or another), it shouldn't be missed as the whole thing is merely a first step of a thousand mile journey.

Very few credible parties and many opportunists will try to join either to build a better future or to grab their share or pie.

If Aung Shwe and Dr Than Nyein want to enter election as they don't want to miss the boat, that's perfectly fine for them to do so. But they should not and will not be doing so in the name of NLD.

The NLD should stand firm on its principles and obligations, in a way that people always trust and put their hope on it.

It will not be a pragmatic approach to boycott the so-called constitution and sham election laws, but this is the true identity of the NLD that people live for and are dying for.




tocharian Wrote:
26/03/2010
If I were a Chinese guy from Peking (the Whos and the Whens), I would be gleefully rubbing my hands seeing how everyone in Burma (NLD, Karens, Kachins, Was, Shans etc. etc.) are fighting each other. It just makes it easier for China to conquer Burma.
Go read "Art of War" by Sun Tzu that every Chinese leader learns by heart ("to conquer barbarians let them fight each other")

K Wrote:
26/03/2010
Ko Aung Zaw: Because you have such a high opinion of DASSK, I would very much like to see you do an article on a hypothetical situation in which DASSK comes to power and she makes Burma a better nation.

Garrett Wrote:
26/03/2010
"But what about Suu Kyi, hardcore members of her party and her other supporters? The strife will undoubtedly continue. It could indeed prove endless—and endlessly confrontational."

If the NLD and the majority of voters who cast their ballots for democracy in 1990 don't start confronting the SPDC, they will endlessly suffer the consequences of
allowing their votes to be marginalized again.

All the while, foreign mercenaries hired by the regime, or their international corporate partners, attempt to misinform and mis-direct the Burmese people as to who is to blame for the actions of the brutal, corrupt, greedy and vengeful SPDC.
They will beckon them to take the deal the SPDC is offering...or else!

For the SPDC, the dreams of hope, democratic freedom and national prosperity which the Burmese people voted for in 1990 were unacceptable.

It is time for the Burmese people to let the SPDC and the world know that the SPDC's sham election and table crumbs of sham-freedom are unacceptable.

Myanmar Patriot 4 UMPF Wrote:
26/03/2010
Suu Kyi Gives Than Shwe a Smart Sidekick WHAT? Are you joking?

Tom Tun Wrote:
26/03/2010
Ko Aung Zaw,
I predicted the future a few months ago. Which was - Burma will turn back to square one, the time of 1962. Let's look at the signs:
(1) Armed minority ethnic groups are fully alert for the comming war with the regime.
(2) Democracy is not an acceptable standard.
(3) Freedom and rights of individuals are not clearly declared by the constitution and law.
(4) There is no clear covenent between different groups within the country.

In 1962, those four signs were there in the country. As stability of the country started to erode, a dictator come to power. Now, to hold the status quo Than Shwe is turning the country back to 1962 conditions.
I believe, right after election, we will see a military assult on minority groups and political unrest in the country. Then THE SAVIOUR OF THE COUNTRY "THE ARMY" WILL RESCUE THE COUNTRY BEFORE IT FALLS OFF THE CLIFF.

A.M.O Wrote:
26/03/2010
Well, the 2010 election (dubbed the only game in town) might be a miscalculation both in timing and text (which Suu Kyi had snubbed as not her cup of tea).

The way it goes, this type of game, played by Than Shwe, might make him end up looking like a stupid fool, in the political scene, towards the end of 2010: like it or not - a perfect pariah.

And to get a gracious transit, he might have to make- 'do something to get out of this dilemma' and there's not so much choice left also.

Only 'One' choice & steps:

1. Postpone 2010 to 2012 to cool all hoo-haa's happenning now.

2. Bring all stake holders to iron out differences for half a year, maybe more.

3. During this time, get a chance to show your magnanimity and forgiveness.

4. Ensure a deferred election acceptable to democratic norms.

Then only, Than Shwe can fade away peacefully.



Maung Thien Maung Wrote:
25/03/2010
Sr. Gen U Than Shwe will only play fair when there is a heavy snowfall on the streets of Rangoon, and also when there will be midnight sun over Burma. Might has always been right since 1982.

Zam Mang Wrote:
25/03/2010
The Iron Lady will fight until the end. We all are supposed to fight with her as Than Shwe is trying to make us accept his crooked agendas. We all need to stand firm and reject his personal agendas.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
25/03/2010
“Suu Kyi would not even think of registering under these unjust [election] laws"!
This is Daw Suu's clarion call for battle no doubt and a direct kick on the monk murderer's butt for all the world to be aware and it is all fair and square as well.
If the imprisoned former student leader Min Ko Naing could fight for democracy without a political “signpost” so could Daw Suu also.
Of course the likes of Daw Suu, Min Ko Naing among others need no political signature nor signpost as long as the people support and stand tall behind them.
Than Shwe knew and dreaded the fact and thus he put away Daw Suu and Min Ko Naing out of sight.
In case the monk murderer put his wrong foot out in this matter he could certainly meet his WATERLOO sooner rather than later, trust me.
A word for Than Shwe to ponder: tread carefully soldier or you will fare no better than your former mentor whom you did not render even a last resting place six feet under.
Let the dogs bark and people change for the better.

Chit Thein Than Wrote:
25/03/2010
Bravo,Aung Zaw! And bravo to ASSK too.
Political activities may be carried out insidiously even without a name or a party. How did the Bolsheviks in Russia do? How did Dr Sun Yat-Sen do in China? What about Michael Collins in Ireland? I think if the people continue supporting ASSK and the NLD they will triumph!

Robert Wrote:
25/03/2010
Suu Kyi could make painfully clear that those members of the NLD that wish to register can do so, but in such a case she should decide to form a new movement. Asking the people not to vote is also a vote.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.