ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO





COMMENTARY
Generals Go Marching Down Memory Lane
By AUNG ZAW Friday, March 27, 2009


COMMENTS (12)
RECOMMEND (312)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Some retired generals and senior officers in Burma have created a storm in Burma’s literary circles by publishing their autobiographies, which are being read with interest inside and outside the country. The books shed light on the inner thoughts of the reclusive military veterans and the famous battles they waged against Burmese communists, the Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) and ethnic rebels.

But the authors aren’t telling their readers all. The draconian publishing laws that followed the 1988 uprising affected them, too, and they can be counted among the victims of self-censorship, with only limited freedom to share their stories with the reading public.

Among the autobiographies that have been well received by the Burmese public is a colorful memoir by Lt-Gen Chit Swe, 75.

Chit Swe was head of the bureau of special operations (South) before the 1988 uprising and a member of the State Law and Order Restoration Council that took power in that year. He last served as forestry minister and was removed from that office in 1997.

Other prominent generals who have published memoirs include Maj-Gen Hla Myint Swe, former transport minister, Brig-Gen Than Tin, deputy prime minister, Brig-Gen Ko Ko, Col Tun Tin, former prime minister, Col Nyunt Swe, former deputy foreign minister, and Major P Kyaw Han, former chairman of Pegu Division.

Their books include impressive accounts of battlefield experiences. On the other hand, their understanding of politics, democracy, diplomacy, economics and the ethnic diversity of Burma is limited. Indeed, this limitation no doubt has led the country to its present state. The generals were trained to repel enemies and defend the nation—and not to run a government.

Brig-Gen Than Tin, who led successful “four cuts” operations against communist insurgents in the Pegu Yoma mountains and ethnic insurgencies in the Irrawaddy delta in the late 1960s early 1970s, was a no-nonsense military officer determined to wipe out the insurgents.

In his autobiography, the general, now in his 80s, proudly claims that he defeated the multi-faceted insurgency and asks whether insurgents dare repeat their past mistakes.

Than Tin recalls that before setting out for Pegu Yoma he breakfasted with the War Office commander in chief, Gen San Yu, finding him gentle and modest. This is the impression of San Yu conveyed in other books, too.

Thus it was chilling to hear the general, handpicked by Gen Ne Win, issue a firm order to turn the insurgent-prone Pegu Yoma into a so-called “White Zone,” free of all insurgents. The Burmese army considered Pegu Yoma to be the enemy’s “brain” and the Irrawaddy delta its “stomach.”

In the next few years, Than Tin applied the “four cuts” strategy against villages and communist insurgents. Two hard-core leaders, Thakin Zin and Thakin Chit, were killed and the insurgency was over.

The “four cuts” strategy—involving forced resettlement of entire communities and confinement of villagers in special camps—had been learnt from the British by another author, Col Tun Tin, while studying in London. Tun Tin became prime minister in 1988.

Tun Tin, veteran of many military actions, including the “Battle of Insein,” set up a three-day war game plan attended by senior officers, including Ne Win. The plan demonstrated “four cuts operations” in practice—resettling villagers, cutting supplies, establishing intelligence, recruiting and raising funds.

It is clear from their writings that the veteran military leaders have little regret for their actions, claiming to have brought law, order and peace to Burma in the 1960s and 1970s.

Aside from their fighting skills, they were loyal to their superiors.

Ne Win invited Than Tin to join him on a trip to upper Burma soon after the general’s successful operation in Pegu Yoma, leaving him in the dark about the purpose.

Ne Win met Than Tin at the airport early in the morning and, addressing him as
“Bo Than Tin” (Ne Win liked to call his subordinates “Bo,” meaning lieutenant), said:  “We are going to the north and today I will appoint you as deputy minister for mining so you are flying with me (to oversee mining projects).”

With those few words, the reshuffle procedure was over. The battle-hardened commander Than Tin, victor over the communists, never questioned his boss’s decision.

In Chit Swe’s books, Ne Win’s name is carefully replaced by “Lugyi,” meaning a senior person or high-ranking official. The reason for the substitution is that the former forestry minister’s books were published after Ne Win’s family members were arrested in 2001, accused of plotting a coup against top military leaders.



1  |  2 | 3 



COMMENTS (12)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Moe Aung Wrote:
02/04/2009
I'd love to see them get carried away with smug arrogance in their successful diplomatic coups and campaigns against the remaining armed resistance groups, and open two fronts at the same time with Bangladesh and Thailand. Humor their delusion of the “Fourth Burmese Empire.”

They’ll see what it's like to pick on someone their own size on a level playing field in contrast to unarmed students and monks or poorly equipped and fragmented insurgents. And what possibilities it will open up for the oppressed peoples of Burma—their own 1917 and Brest-Litovsk, perhaps.

plan B Wrote:
02/04/2009
Ko Moe Aung and Eric Johnston: The answers to the “what ifs” lie within your comments. Think different, that is the essence of paradigm shift.

What makes the difference between you me and others opposed to Okkar and the likes is we are not self-serving.

Eric Johnston Wrote:
01/04/2009
Do we perhaps glimpse another reason they need to change out of uniform and into mufti?

An apparent lack of people to fight (the fight must go underground), leaves a huge army with little to do.

The generals' only alternative is to make problems with neighbours. That could prove costly. But they have already shown that, for them, military solutions take precedence, irrespective of the cost.

Moe Aung Wrote:
31/03/2009
"Insurgency is finally on the brink of being quelled"—


There'll be no place for so many generals if (not when) the insurgency is over. It's one of the two pillars that they've built their legitimacy on, and they have every intention to keep the fire smouldering in a low-intensity conflict. Without a genuine political solution addressing legitimate grievances, no amount of making deals and ceasefires is going to see the end of communal strife. If military rule has lasted 47 years, the civil war is now 61 years old. Staying power?

"…their achievement and determination...all the effort they put in for last 60 years"—

Yes, in clinging on to power at the expense of an entire nation.
Of course, they have nothing to do with Burma's unenviable "failed-state status."

What was so prominent by its absence in the “Four Cuts” campaign was “the battle for hearts and minds.” They never bothered.

Eric Johnston Wrote:
31/03/2009
One sentence of mine has been altered and the sense is no longer clear. It should read:

On a national scale, a clear commitment to the independence of Malaya, and -- as the MCP drew its strength almost exclusively from Chinese settlers -- a guaranteed future for the Chinese.

These latter two points are more correctly credited to Briggs's successor, Gen Templer.

Eric Johnston Wrote:
30/03/2009
What Col Tun Tin ignored, put in other words:

"The priority placed on winning the support of the population rather than defeating the insurgents by force of arms is reinforced in the specific instructions to military forces...The New Villages would include schools, medical aid stations, community centers, village cooperatives, and even Boy Scout troops As the locals gained confidence in the determination to protect them, they would progress from serving in an unarmed Home Guard through to keeping shotguns in their homes, ready for instant action... In October [1951] the Central Committee of the MCP...decided...to decrease attacks on peasants and on their sources of livelihood to ensure their support for the struggle. That struggle was about to get much more difficult...In general the 'Chinese Army' resisted effectively; of 89,000 weapons issued to the Home Guard by November 1954, only 103 had been lost."

From 'Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife' by Lt-Col John Nagl, US Army.

U Saw Oo Wrote:
30/03/2009
One of the best pieces on behind the scenes in Burma.

kyaw zin thant Wrote:
29/03/2009
I’m 90 percent sure that the books contain just 12th century thinking about the politics and economics of the country. The reason is that they [the authors] think themselves as warriors, just like fighters of the Roman Empire. But they don't think the way the world thinks in the 21st century, that they're conducting crimes against humanity, racism, rape, genocide.

Eric Johnston Wrote:
28/03/2009
Unfortunately for Burma, Col Tun Tin ignored the key element in British counter-insurgency methods developed by Gen Briggs, pre-independence army commander in Burma.

The key, emphasized Briggs, is political, not military. Get the people on your side. Treat them with respect. Give them what they want. At the village level: health services, education and security. On a national scale: a clear commitment to independence.

In Malaya, the MCP drew its strength almost exclusively from Chinese settlers—a guaranteed future for the Chinese.

The army was used to reinforce the civil authority, the police, the law courts etc. There was no martial law. The inhabitants of the new fortified villages were in due course given primary responsibility for their own defense. This allowed the army to concentrate on seeking out the guerrillas in the jungle, using small highly mobile units.

Zaw Min Wrote:
28/03/2009
The military selection process was biased toward those who dumbly followed orders after Ne Win took over power in 1962. Promotions were based on this quality rather than leadership or battlefield qualities. Yet, up to 1988 or the early part of SLORC and SPDC government, there were some commanders who still had some leadership quality in on the battlefield. These battle-hardened commanders were removed or retired due to age or any other reason. Our present commanders, without any battlefield or leadership quality, glorify in the past achievement of the military.

Those past commanders, as well as the present ones, knew their true situation but, as Aung Zaw says, they are also prisoners of the military system that they inherited from Ne Win. Our country is a classic showcase of the evils of military rule. Ne Win was not good but many think he was better than the present one. This shows how far we have sunk into a deep ravine.

Moe Aung Wrote:
28/03/2009
Excellent account! "One blood, one voice, one command," as they say. Soldiers don't think, they obey.

plan B Wrote:
28/03/2009
These autobiographies, however self-serving, will again highlight the staying power of this present junta.

Please do not be dismissive of them. They are not underachievers. They are enjoying the low-bar given them by the observer as underachievers.

Please be reminded of the serious loyalty that exists among them. That has been the historical tradition of the Burmese military. Hope for internal dissension should be the remotest possibility.

As illegal as they are election-wise, one will see why they regard themselves as legal guardians of the Union, for all the effort they put in for last 60 years.

Burma has known no internal peace since '48. Insurgency is finally on the brink of being quelled.

I hope when the Western countries deal with the present junta, which they must for the citizenry's sake, they will be reminded of their achievement and determination as opposed to blinded by their failures as a government.

The next round of the same policy will hasten the country towards failed-state status.

More Articles in This Section

bullet Sizing Up an Icon

bullet Fighting Corruption Begins at Home

bullet Future of Exiled Burmese Media

bullet How Much Freedom Does Burmese Media Enjoy?

bullet Five Days in Burma

bullet Turning Burma into Next Asian Tiger No Simple Task

bullet With Suu Kyi On Board, Is Burma Finally Moving Toward Real Change?

bullet The ‘Rule of Law’ in Burma

bullet New Doors are Opening in Burma

bullet A Good Beginning to the New Year






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.