IMF: Burma Could Become Asia’s Next Economic Frontier
covering burma and southeast asia
Sunday, July 25, 2021
Burma

IMF: Burma Could Become Asia’s Next Economic Frontier


By STEPHEN BLOOM / THE IRRAWADDY Thursday, January 26, 2012


Cashiers behind piles of Burmese kyat banknotes in a private bank in Rangoon in July 2011. (Photo: Reuters)
COMMENTS (14)
RECOMMEND (291)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

An International Monetary Fund (IMF) report published on Wednesday highlighted both Burma’s potential for high economic growth and the enormous amount of work that will be required to realize that potential.

“The new government is facing a historic opportunity to jump-start the development process and lift living standards. Myanmar [Burma] has a high growth potential and could become the next economic frontier in Asia,” said an IMF statement issued by Meral Karasulu, who led an IMF Article IV mission to Burma from Jan. 9-25.

In order to accomplish this, the IMF statement said, Burma must turn its rich natural resources, young labor force and strategic economic location to its advantage, and the first step in this process is an economic reform program aimed at establishing macroeconomic stability.

If successful, such macroeconomic reform would lay an economic foundation that would allow rapid investment and development to take place in Burma that is both sustainable and does not produce dangerous destabilizing effects. But the IMF outlined major steps that will be required to institute such a reform package.

The IMF indicated that the top priority should be reforming Burma’s parallel exchange rate system—under which the official government exchange rate and the actual “black market” exchange rate are widely disparate—to eliminate constraints on economic growth.

According to the IMF, the Central Bank of Myanmar is already in the process of laying the technical groundwork and establishing the necessary market structure for implementing a unified exchange rate.

That process, however, will “require improvements in all areas of macroeconomic management,“ beginning with the establishment of a monetary policy framework that works to control inflation.

This in turn would mean that the Burmese government would have to halt its past policy of printing money as a means to reducing its budget deficit, which the IMF projected would be 4.6 percent of GDP for FY2012/2013, down about 1 percent from the previous year.

The IMF noted that revenues generated by investment and development spurred by a unification of the exchange rate, as well as revenues from the sale of natural gas, would improve Burma’s budget in the future.

However, exchange rate unification would also force the budget to reflect the losses incurred by state-owned businesses, which are now hidden by the parallel exchange system. The IMF said that further privatization of state-owned enterprises is also needed to spur private-sector growth.

According to the IMF, further sources of fiscal revenues, beyond those now contemplated, will need to be found to fund Burma’s projected development needs and provide a safety net for times of economic downturn, particularly price-declines for commodities such as natural gas.

Burma’s Parliament, which opened its current session on Thursday, will be discussing the FY2012/2013 budget in the coming weeks, and the IMF called it “a historic opportunity to redefine national spending priorities and bring fiscal transparency. “

In addition to exchange rate unification and the establishment of a sound fiscal policy, the IMF statement said that “Modernization of the financial system should be expedited to facilitate broad-based growth.”

This would include increasing the access to capital by private enterprises through such measures as a liberalization of loan requirements, expansion of bank networks into rural areas, nurturing competition among commercial banks and establishing a level playing field between state and private banks.

In addition, the IMF said that “allowing joint ventures with foreign banks would expedite the transfer of technology and prepare the sector for ASEAN financial integration in 2015.”

Increased credit is particularly important to Burma’s agricultural sector, and the IMF said that land reform should ensure that farmers can use land titles as collateral and private banks should be encouraged to lend in this sector as well.

But the IMF cautioned that “credit alone will not suffice to increase rural growth, which is essential to alleviate poverty,” and said that investment in rural infrastructure and spending on health and education are also essential.

In that respect, in its discussion of Burma’s 2012/2013 budget, the IMF welcomed the Burmese government’s reported “plans to reorient spending to health and education.” It also said that additional revenues generated by financial reforms should be used to build human capital and infrastructure.



1  |  2  next page »

COMMENTS (14)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

azirony Wrote:
03/02/2012
This is certainly a step in the right direction and a much needed boost for Myanmar’s image. It really is all about this country at the moment first the release of and then the visit by Hillary Clinton and now this. I’m sure that there are also plenty of politicians ready to leap into Burma once they get the green light.
Our <a href="http://www.thailand-lawyer.com/company_registration.html"> Company Lawyer Thailand </a> is already looking at the legality of us doing business over in Burma and there is more than a slight interest from businesses over here.

Lets hope that these latest developments don’t move to fast as a lot of the ordinary people of the country are going to get trampled on once the inevitable wave of foreign investment comes rolling into town. Myanmar has a hell of a lot of natural resources ready for the plucking and the Chinese have already staked their claim in the region.

Thant Zin Aung Wrote:
03/02/2012
That's cool, it's better opportunities for the people of Myanmar. Forget about the past and think about future.

U Tha Phru Wrote:
29/01/2012
Bravo. Finally we can see light at the end of the tunnel.

Let the policies and implementation be handled by IMF world bank, ADB etc in consultation with many financial experts and genius myanmar national spread all over the world and put under the carpets inside Myanmar.

Disastrous projects like Dawei port and industrial Zones shall be remodeled and overhauled putting it into the right hands and institutions

naive Wrote:
28/01/2012
happygolfer is not as naive as me.we need a new bretton wood in burma. i am naive again. use gold for international settlements. you cant print gold so cant invader other countries. burma must dig more gold by hand so every gets job. no need to buy machines.

Online Tourist Wrote:
28/01/2012
Chances are out there.Let's just see how they are gonna handle those chances.

Tom Wrote:
28/01/2012
Whilst its sensible to be careful in dealings with IMF, they are right about the need for a single, workable exchange rate to enable Burma to trade its way to greater wealth for everyone. It does not need to be exposed to all market forces and to float freely in the beginning. Look at the China model, they keep their currency artificially low and it works to their advantage short tems. Burma can start to break away from the shackles of India, Thailand, Singapore and China, who have been supporting the Junta and raping the country of its resources, but progress needs to be careful and in the interests of all Burmese people.

KML Wrote:
27/01/2012
Good news ahead for the country with the following caution:
“In 1996 the Global Human Development Report reminded us that growth is not always conducive to human development, that growth can be also jobless, ruthless, voiceless, rootless, and futureless and thus not contributing to people’s capabilities”
Ivanov A (2009), UNDP, The economic crisis as a human development opportunity
http://www.developmentandtransition.net/Article.35+M5c8ff7a7a23.0.html

lint Wrote:
27/01/2012
"The IMF noted that revenues generated by investment and development spurred by a unification of the exchange rate, as well as revenues from the sale of natural gas, would improve Burma’s budget in the future". In other words the money stolen by UMEHL from PTT for the gas by using two different exchange rates and keeping the rest would be stopped. This is why the current "budget debates" in Burma are a joke. No one is asking where is the stolen gas money? So of course there are deficits!

happygolfer Wrote:
27/01/2012
I am pleased to see that Myanmar is on its way to opening up and building a modern economy. I am hopeful. It is important that Myanmar sought out all ideas for economic improvement.

But, please don't forget recent history. In the Asia Tiger collapse of the late 90s, IMF was proven to be NOT an impartial organization of Economic wisdom. Economic imperialism is ingrained in IMF and in the 90s its focus was the asset stripping the Asian Tigers. After having been found out (by the likes of PM Mahathir from Malaysia), IMF faded into an irrelevant European club (at least for Asia).

It got lucky and managed to project a "new " image in the E.Europe collapse. It behaved better in East Europe (ethnic similarity at play?)

None of the successful Asian countries listens to IMF now a days. Myanmar and Daw A S Su Kyi will be better off listening to the likes of Dr Mahathir, who have 1st hand knowledge of IMF "advice".

Please be cautious of economic imperialism.

khar Wrote:
27/01/2012
Selling government asset to private sector; like what russia, mexico and india are doing-creating billionaires in countries where the majority earns suicidal wages? That's not the option. what burmese government needs to do is to put in positions of power people with real education and some brain. in the short term, getting help from competent and quality companies like companies from singapore for running government, chinese companies for building infrastructures like high speed rails between burmese major cities, airports and roads, Exxon Mobile for energy sector, do like what Qatar is doing with Exxon, similar kind of contracts where exxon only get small percentage of income. and let me do the macro planning for the whole nation.

Moe Aung Wrote:
27/01/2012
Reasons to be cheerful:

a. away from the deadly embrace of China - likely not from the frying pan to the fire.

b. prosperity in store, if it's only the top 10% of the populace - more rain where there's plenty of water.

c. progress, development and modernity hopefully not confined to just hotels, tourist beaches, shopping malls, karaoke bars, massage parlors, half naked women splashed on billboards and mags, gambling dens, drug pushers, junkies and prostitutes, perhaps plenty more poorly paid jobs, dirty and dangerous jobs.

d. last but not least, democratic principles rubbed off from the dominant liberal democracies.

Oo Maung Gyi Wrote:
27/01/2012
To become Burma as economic frontier, it is essential to cooperate with IMF is a must. Comparing with other Asean countries such Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Indonesia and Brunei Burma is far behind in development sector. So the government should require to change present exchange rate so that to have one exchange rate which is suitable and competitive in the local and international markets in-conformity with current face vale of regional currencies.
So in the long run Burmese Kyats will stablize for a long termAs uirma is rich in natrural resources, no need to worry to get raw materials in mining sector also in the field of marine products. From the forestry sector also Burma has still vergin forest in the states and division so that logs, timber and timber product can be extracted and use for manufacturing purposes such as furniture and etc. Require investers in all sectors.

Dave Wrote:
27/01/2012
"Top priority is reforming the parallel exchange system." This is typical IMF advice and a typical IMF priority, in which the priorities of human beings must bend to the interests of foreign capital. Exchange rates have, of course, been manipulated and exploited by domestic cronies for decades to plunder Myanmar's wealth, but be warned that the IMF certainly never give impartial advice for the benefit of all. Far from it.

The most difficult time for this country begins now, imo. Are those who have struggled for years to secure basic civil and political rights for citizens well-equipped to discuss economic matters critically? Debate is certainly needed, as there is a worrying tendency among democracy activists to wish for whatever is opposite to the economics of military rule. Better policies demand critical debate and struggle against established powers at home and abroad.

Mg Min Nway Wrote:
27/01/2012
I think Burma has long way to go. Rule of law should be established. Infrastructure must be improved. Those on top who are not qualified for Job but holding the post because of connection to military personnel should be removed.

more articles in this section