Tutu Dismisses Election as 'Charade'
covering burma and southeast asia
Sunday, July 04, 2021
Interview

Tutu Dismisses Election as 'Charade'


By THE IRRAWADDY Friday, March 12, 2010


COMMENTS (4)
RECOMMEND (367)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

In a message of encouragement to Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, South African Archbishop Emeritus and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Desmond Tutu said he looks forward to traveling to Rangoon “to join you in your celebrations when you, my sister, are inaugurated as the true, freely elected leader of Burma.”

Tutu addressed his fellow Nobel Peace Prize laureate in an interview with The Irrawaddy, in which he also dismissed the planned 2010 general election as a “charade.”

Desmond Tutu (Photo: Reuters)

Tutu asked: “How can you claim to hold a free democratic election when the leader of the main opposition which won a landslide victory in the last truly democratic and free election is excluded and where the election commissioners will be handpicked by the junta?”

The full text of The Irrawaddy's exclusive interview with Tutu:

QUESTION: Under President Obama's administration, the US has adopted a direct engagement policy with the Burmese regime. But so far, after numerous meetings, there are no signs of progress, only more repression. What are your thoughts on the US engagement policy?

ANSWER: It is just possible that after a tough sanctions policy, a softer approach just might bring about movement. I am somewhat doubtful and it seems Secretary Campbell [Assistant US Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell] has similar doubts. What we want is positive change and [we] will sing 'Alleluia' when Aung San Suu Kyi and all political prisoners are released and democracy is given a real chance, by whatever means. That is the goal.

Q: You have long advocated a tough sanctions policy on the regime. In 2005, you and former Czech President Vaclav Havel commissioned a report calling for UN Security Council action against the junta. However, Burma's neighbors continue to trade and engage the regime. What are your recommendations to the West, the UN, and neighboring countries, including China, India and the Asean nations?
 
A: The aim surely must be to see democracy revived and flourishing in Burma. Remember what happened in South Africa. The apartheid government was intransigent and we called for sanctions. Many Western governments did not heed our plea, including the Reagan administration. But when the US applied those sanctions, apartheid crumbled. Sanctions when applied consistently do work and they are a nonviolent means to end oppression. Governments should ask themselves, on whose side are we? If the opposition calls for sanctions then who are outsiders to say, ‘Sanctions hurt the people we want to help?'

Q: There are consistent reports of human rights violations committed by the Burmese armed forces: rape and religious persecution in ethnic war zones and minority areas and forced recruitment of child soldiers, to name a few. Do you see any way to apply more force/pressure to halt such abuses?
 
A: Yes, end the rule of the brutal military junta and impress on them that they are going to be indicted before the International Criminal Court for all their gross violations of human rights and their crimes against humanity.

Q: The regime will hold an election in 2010 and has just announced the election law. Many people doubt that the election will be free, fair and inclusive. How do you view the election?
 
A: This is no free election. It is a charade.



1  |  2  next page »

COMMENTS (4)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Garrett Wrote:
21/03/2010
Quote Kerry:

"Burma could be free of this nightmare by the end of 2010. The world simply cannot allow this travesty to continue."

Sure, if "the world" plans on forming a military coalition to go into Burma to remove the SPDC & purge the corrupt officers from the Burma army.

It's more likely that "the world" will continue to take part in the rape of Burma by supporting the regime with their corporate investments & political inactions, just as "the world" did in Iraq after the first gulf war.

And why should "the world" need to offer the Burmese people their "heartfelt apologies" when year after year, 30 million-plus Burmese citizens meekly allowed their sons to become the enforcers of their poverty, as well as the tools of the SPDC persecution, rape, & enslavement of 15 million-plus ethnic minority Burmese citizens?

As long as the majority of the Burmese people refuse to stand-up for the freedom and democracy of ALL Burmese citizens, "the world" will NEVER stand-up for them.

Kerry Wrote:
13/03/2010
The people of Burma are not just in a "dilemma," Moe Myatye. They are at a crossroads.

Burma could be free of this nightmare by the end of 2010. The world simply cannot allow this travesty to continue.

The generals are not just "selfish," MM. They are a barbaric relic from another era.

People are over thugs posing as statesmen. People are even over the "displeasure" from much larger countries who support them, to hide their own grave human rights transgressions.

This is, after all, 2010. The Internet has enabled people to speak from even the darkest corners.

The whole world is watching Burma. The best hope for the generals is to try to find some obscure country that will take them because of the blood money they have in their banks somewhere.

Wealth did not protect those who were called to account at Nuremberg.

Burmese people have had enough "bitter pills," my friend. No more dying. It is time for Burma to rejoin the world, with our heart-felt apologies.

BROB Wrote:
12/03/2010
Tutu is absolutely correct! If only more public figures would stand up for a free democratic Burma, the quicker Than Shwe comes before the International Criminal Court for his crimes against humanity!

AUNG SAN SUU KYI is without doubt the democratically voted leader of Burma. The forthcoming elections this year can NEVER be recognised while the leader of the opposition is imprisoned.
Hitler did the same.. Than Shwe is the Burmese Hitler.

So why is the world tolerating him and his regime? Sanctions.. and get rid of him!!

Moe Myatye Wrote:
12/03/2010
Live or Die Trying
The people of Burma are in dillemma. They want a free and fair election. And the rest of the world also will trust only if Aung San Suukyi are allowed to compete. But when the regime is selfishly moving forward with its own rules and regulations, the people have no choice, but have to swallow that bitter pill, or die trying.

Moe Myatye, U.S.A

more articles in this section