Pinheiro’s plea to the Burmese regime Effectively barred from carrying out his responsibilities in
Question: Having not been able to visit Answer: When countries don’t let a special rapporteur come into the country, I think that this decision doesn’t serve the interests of the government, because in fact this mandate of special rapporteur is an interesting role—I am not an NGO, I am not a UN employee, I am not an employee of any regional bloc. Then this hinders the work of the Commission on Human Rights, because it’s the Commission that decides to appoint a special rapporteur and member states are supposed to cooperate. So this hampers my efficiency and hampers also the best interests, not only of the people, but of the government. Q: What reason has the Burmese government given for not now allowing you into the country? A: I cannot interpret the thoughts of the Q: In the last 18 months, during which time you haven’t been able to make a visit to A: Well, I have said this in the past because I have been so angry about not being able to visit. Q: Do you have a timetable agreed with the Burmese government concerning a visit to the country? A: No. I always need to return to the country, as in the past, before my report. I present two reports, the Commission’s and the General Assembly. So the idea is to go to the country before so that I can have material and interviews. Q: There is a sense among Burmese people that the UN has essentially failed to prompt reforms in the country. What do you think? A: It’s unfair to say this because it is not the responsibility of the UN. What the resolution of the General Assembly gives to the Secretary General is to facilitate precisely the role of the national actors to make these reforms. It is not the UN, the UN is not the government of the world. The responsibility is first of all the government and also of all the political forces and I must say that the UN doesn’t fail because you have to consider that all the agencies are doing extraordinary work. But what is not functioning at the moment is not the responsibility of the Secretary General, it’s the responsibility of the government because the government refuses the presence of the special envoy [Razali Ismail] and does not accept my visit. Then it is not the fault of the UN. Only when you have a mandate for other countries that is very specific, for instance the transition in East Timor, my fellow Brazilian was there, Sergio Vieira de Mello, but this is not the case with
Q: What is the time frame for the national reconciliation process? When will a national referendum and subsequent election happen?
A: Who can answer this? Only the government of Q: How much faith do you have in the National Convention process that is taking place at the moment? A: ‘Faith’ is not in political or human rights term—I don’t use ‘faith’. We just deal with facts. In the past I have expressed my opinion that I thought it would be better and a more inclusive National Convention with the participation of political parties, but at this very moment that National Convention is almost finishing. I am worried about the drafting of the constitution, what this constitution will be. I think it is a fact of reality that there is this National Convention, that it was organised with its limitations and constraints. You know the crises with some political leaders that were expelled, that were put in detention like someone that I have met over six times, Hkun Htun Oo, the chairperson of the Shan NLD. I must confess that I am very uncomfortable seeing people that I have met in prison. This for me is really very disagreeable. Then we need to discuss the future, because if you don’t discuss the future we don’t ask the present administration—it will repeat this sort of violation. Q: How would you assess the four years you have spent as special rapporteur on human rights to A: I think I have been able to implement an incremental approach. I was able to visit several provinces; I was able to have productive meetings with human rights people, visit prisons. I think it is very important to have contact with political prisoners, they were very happy about my visits. That is my test—if the victims like it, I am doing a good job. If the victims don’t like… the only reputation I am worried about is my reputation vis-?-vis the victims of violations and again I think that I help to draw attention to problems. |
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group |
www.irrawaddy.org |