ADVERTISE | DONATION
Irrawaddy CONTACT US|FAQ
BURMESE VERSION | VIDEO






Wa: The Regime’s Next Target?
By AUNG ZAW Friday, September 4, 2009


COMMENTS (17)
RECOMMEND (798)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

After capturing the Kokang capital of Laogai with relative ease, the question on everybody’s lips is: will the Burmese military regime now go after the Wa army?

Much as it would appear to be the next logical step in the military government’s plan to subdue resistance to its authoritarian rule ahead of next year’s election, a conflict with the Wa, known officially as the United Wa State Army (UWSA), could be a prolonged campaign with serious consequences, analysts have warned.

The United Wa State Army is among the strong ethnic armies in northern Burma that Chinese officials are courting.

The UWSA is the biggest and strongest ethnic force in Burma with some 20,000 to 25,000 soldiers. And despite signing a ceasefire agreement with the Burmese junta in 1989, it has actively and consistently been buying more weapons from China since then.

According to a report in the March 2008 issue of Jane’s Intelligence Review: “As the possibility of a war with the junta has loomed larger, the UWSA has acquired more sophisticated weapons including anti-aircraft systems. In or around 2000, the Wa added to their small arsenal of Soviet Streal-2 (SA-7) man-portable air defense systems [MANPADS] when they acquired HN-5N systems, an improved Chinese version of the first-generation Soviet system.”

Additionally, the Wa have added heavier combat weapons to their arsenal, including  12.7 and 14.5 mm anti-aircraft guns, as well as 60 mm, 82 mm and 120 mm mortars, all from China.

In 2007, advisers from the Chinese People’s Liberation Army provided artillery training in the Lu Fang mountain range west of Panghsang, the capital of Wa State.

This would suggest that Beijing doesn’t want to see the Wa weakened; it is natural that China wants to maintain its buffer zone.

Now also equipped with 130 mm field guns and 122 mm howitzers, the UWSA soldiers have reportedly dug a complex of underground command centers near Panghsang, clearly intended for protection against aerial attacks by the Burmese air force.

But could the Wa resist a government forces’ onslaught by land?

Some Burma observers estimate that the Wa wouldn’t be able to defend its territory for a long period of time if the regime decided to launch a major offensive against the ethnic group.

Maj Aung Lynn Htut, a former intelligence officer who is currently seeking asylum in the USA, said he believed the regime is prepared to attack the UWSA, but is cautiously testing the water with China which has long supported the Wa and other armed ethnic groups along the Sino-Burmese border.

The former intelligence officer, who in the past traveled to Shan State to meet and negotiate with ethnic ceasefire groups, said that if China doesn’t back the Wa, all the ethnic armies in the region will be “wiped out.”

With regard to the recent clashes between the government forces and the Kokang army, which led to between 10,000 and 30,000 civilians fleeing to the Chinese side of the border, Beijing has publically called for the Burmese generals to restore stability and peace on the border. However, China failed to stop the regime’s attack on the Kokang—a Han Chinese ethnic group.

Htay Aung, a researcher at the Thailand-based Network for Democracy and Development, said he thinks Wa leaders with invested business interests in Burma and China are not ready to fight.

He said the Wa leaders have in the past said that they will not initiate hostilities with the junta. He added that the Chinese could even act as a peace broker between the Wa leaders and the Burmese regime.

For their part, many Wa leaders are involved in the hotel and entertainment businesses in Rangoon and Mandalay. In Panghsang, they have built a paper mill, a cigarette factory and a bottled water factory.

Meanwhile, Naypyidaw has reinforces its troop strength in northeastern Burma. Most analysts agree that the military government forces have greater fire power than the Wa, not to mention an air force. 

However, an attack on the UWSA would upset the Chinese who would have to deal with an even larger influx of refugees.

It would also motivate the other ethnic ceasefire groups—most notably the Kachin Independence Army—to join the resistance, knowing that they would be next targets.

Bertil Lintner, a Swedish journalist who has written several books on Burma, said that the pressure is clearly on the Wa.

“The Wa will be the main target of the present offensive,” he said.



1  |  2 



COMMENTS (17)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

PPP Wrote:
12/09/2009
If Than Shwe and Maung Aye are got rid of, the country will be peaceful. Democracy and prosperity will come in this country.

not amused Wrote:
07/09/2009
This brings us back to the question of why Aung San was assasinated. He knew he had to talk to the ethnics, which he did and thus the Panglong Agreement that was the main pillar in Burma's gaining independence. How many fellow Burmans wished him death for signing is hard to fathom. His death right after independence opened the Pandora's box who consider themselves the only thakin. If present-day Burmese still consider themselves likewise, there will be no peace at all even after the fall of the junta.

Oo Maung Gyi Wrote:
07/09/2009
Since Wa has built arms manufacturing Plant, it is the duty of Junta to attack and wipe out the Wa army, otherwise there will be complicated problems in future for the country. It is good sign for national interest.

Greenland Wrote:
07/09/2009
Burma is engaging in its own self destruction by fighting its own people. In this act of subjugation over another we as citizens/residents of the country should not be the cheerleaders.

Than Shwe should realize he can not monopolize the country alone on behalf of the nationalistic / chauvinistic Burman race. Who appointed or elected him to be the leader of the country - not even his own race?

The country as we know 'Burma' is a shared country among various ethnic groups, each in its own traditional occupied land. If he wants the country to be peaceful and developed he should start by adopting the attitude of sharing not monopolizing with an attitude of superiority over others. Fighting and resistence will go on as long as this superior attitude is cherished.

To resolve the whole problem why not start by changing the name of the country from 'Burma' or 'Myanmar' to one that doesn't represent any nationalities of the country. As an example, like Canada, Australia or New Zealand.

LaDaYay Wrote:
06/09/2009
If the small victory can comfort the majority of Burmese(I mean the Burman race), it is no bad thing, while the whole country's business, except Tayza's one, is being run by the so-called Chinese people. As long as the majority(Burman race) can't get respect from minorities, the country will always be chaotic, and another big problem will be exposed after the next year's election.

Eric Johnston Wrote:
06/09/2009
The regime may not be too troubled by the problems it causes China, because her investments in Burma mean they have her over the end of a barrel.

The case of the Wa is but one example of western governments' inability to confront reality and act upon opportunity. They slumber in fond imaginings and utter empty phrases.

In 1993 the Wa offered to give up the drug trade in return for a modest amount of aid. But the policy of the US and the UN was that they would deal only with the regime. This attitude is exemplified by Canberra's recent refusal of cross-border medical aid. Thus they strengthen the regime and lend it undeserved credibility.

Were Churchill for all his faults alive today, he might well remark: "If Than Shwe invaded hell, I would make at least a favourable reference in this House to the devil." Of course he did much more than make a favourable reference. The North Cape convoys carrying vital war material to the USSR were the costliest of all time.

KKK Wrote:
06/09/2009
Kokang, UWSA, KIO, and KIA should get rid of drug lord Lo Sin Han and his family immidiately. Lo Sin Han and his family are the most responsible this war.

plan B Wrote:
05/09/2009
Dear fellow expat posters here at Irrawaddy:

Let us not tear each other apart here thru words and ideas that might seem "nationalistic."

These views that hurt each other will serve no purpose but fray the ties further that is needed when this tragic present events become a blip of history.

How we treat each other will be seen, remembered and judged by others.

As it is, like it or not their perceptions do count.

Hurting each other here will just be a reflection of approving any barbarity whether committed by SPDC or other group.
Therefore convey a picture of "I don't hurt them anymore than they hurt themselves.
Assuring the continuity of the useless interferences will continue.

As it is we have enough among us in foreign lands doing just that!

rakkO Wrote:
05/09/2009
This article has brought the Burmese racists out of the woodwork. The ethnic militias should unite and throw off the yoke that Myanmar has imposed on them.

tun tun than Wrote:
05/09/2009
The irony is that Burmese regime will have to do this job as it is unnecessarily inevitable for them to maintain their power. Otherwise, it will lose its credibility and legitimacy among its allies. However, when it happens, its aftermath (the effect) is going to enforce ethnic groups and democracy forces throughout the country to be united in an unpredictable way that will ultimately challenge the power of the regime, fomenting a catalyst point when Burmese see the revolution is ripe enough to overthrow the regime.

Well, the practical question for us is what other ethnic groups and democracy forces should do before the regime do something to the UWSA?

TUN TUN THAN Wrote:
05/09/2009
You know what would happen when a dog is put in a corner and beaten. It will bite back till it is dead. And that will have serious negative effects on China's role in Asia) That was why China cleverly allowed Kokang refugees fleeing into their soil to make sure Kokangs were not beaten in a corner nor did they fight the Burmese regime back while publicly saying the Burmese regime to handle the issue with care. In fact, it was China's betrayal-the hidden punch to the Kokangs. Like this, the UWSA, when pressured, will finally surrender to the Chinese regime like Koakng did. Otherwise, it would be divided into pieces.

I have no doubt that sooner or later the Burmese regime will put pressure on the UWSA, and the UWSA will give up its power to the regime at last.

TUN TUN THAN Wrote:
05/09/2009
Then, why THEY (US, China, and its partners) care about Burma that only have problems?) I would like to say that that is why we are seeing many revolutions throughout the world have been wiped out immediately or gradually through supports from NGOs and INGOs or by direct pressures imposed by super powers like US and its allies including China. If anything, we are witnessing the issue of democracy and peace on the world are no longer popular in these days. If it is an issue, then those governments will also make sure that ethnic issues or democracy revolution in Burma be wiped out completely in order to protect their mutual interests.

Let's go back to the Burmese issue. If the regime put pressures on the United Wa State Army (UWSA), I would have no doubt that China would happily welcome Wa refugees in their territory instead of seeing a series of fights between the junta's troops and the UWSA's.

TUN TUN THAN Wrote:
05/09/2009
Why did China make Kokangs surrender to them instead of supporting Kokangs to continue their fight against the Burmese regime if Beijing doesn’t want to see the Wa weakened? Well, Burmese regime is extremely happy with Kokang's surrender to China and gave their special thanks and respects to China. Don't forget the fact that China is the regime's close ally.

Let's just try to look at the whole picture. I see today's world is all about maintaining "the security, stability, and development" throughout the world, that mainly protect interests of the superpowers. In this regard, China and US have the same idea (no argument) that they don't need any revolution or social movements on the world that can cause any instability destroying their "interests."

Think seriously who is making a lot of money in China? No doubt, they were US, Japan, and its counterparts- while China, that is greedy going after the money, has a lot of broken promises given to the oppressed people on their world under the name of their internationalism.

TUN TUN THAN Wrote:
05/09/2009
Good analysis and well written article, U Aung Zaw since it gave me a lot of thoughts and insights.

However, I humbly assume that at this moment the Chinese regime is only interested in "the government to government relationship" rather than playing a power game against the Burmese junta. Therefore, I think what has happened to Kokangs was all about the give-and-take solution between China and Burmese regime. It is in fact just a well-planned conspiracy between two governments, but every government and institution knows about what happened to the Kokangs. Having analyzed the Kokang's situation, Chinese regime is clearly signaling the ethnic groups that they do not want to see any fights along the Sino-Burmese border areas (they are seriously concern about seeing peace along the Sino-Burmese border areas) that will attract attentions from the international community.

planB Wrote:
05/09/2009
Ko Aung Zaw,

Nobody really wins in the end in such internal conflicts. Be it Chinese descend, Indian ancestry or derivative of Khmer. Fighting here amount to "national self mutilation".

The subsequent barbarity that inevitable that follow will just further diminish a nation status.

As it is US call for end to hostilities here:
http://irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=16694
Show so little with regards to the events that 'they know will lead to this day'.

It is just another Brothers against Brothers barbarity as far as the west see these events.

Therefore justifying their Banana Republic attitude towards their dealings with Myanmar.

The Chinese know now how fast SPDC can change. A kind of like being a creditor to US.

In this case the resources that they have depended on might be up for a better bid by India. Albeit delaying or rather detracting from needed engagement.

George Than Setkyar Heine Wrote:
05/09/2009
UWSA, SSA(S),Kokang and other ethnic Chinese based rebels are no big deal for Than Shwe and he is duty bound to clear the lot now or things will get out of hand if left unattended like this.

He can leave KIA, KNU, NMSP alone as they are the natives of Burma who have every right and privilege to live and die in the country like all of us.

A political settlement is all that is needed to resolve the existing differences after Than Shwe finished his job clearing ethnic Chinese based elements on the Sino-Burmese borders aiming to establish their enclaves on Burma's soil while playing proxy to Chinese communists eventually leading to annexation of Burma as a province of China.

China's pipeline to Yunnan and Burma as the communists' gateway to the Indian and Pacific oceans hinged on the survival of the UWSA, SSA(S) and Kokang also on the short and long term.

Now or never is his choice and he is no fool nor stupid to let the Chinese communists kick his ass around I know.

ddd Wrote:
04/09/2009
Very good analysis about the clash between Burma and the Wa

More Articles in This Section

bullet 'My Wife Died From Police Abuse,' Says Husband

bullet US Says Observer Conditions Don't Meet Int'l Standards

bullet 159 Observers to Monitor Burma Election

bullet Govt to Address Breaches of SSA-South Ceasefire: Aung Min

bullet Burma Investors Pin Hopes on Seminal Sunday

bullet Malaysia PM Leads 50-Strong Delegation to Burma

bullet US Congress to Assess Burma's Political Prisoner Issue

bullet Rangoon Woman in Police Station Death Plunge

bullet Burmese Legal System Remains Tool of Govt: AHRC

bullet Burmese Army Chief Defends Political Role






Thailand Hotels
Bangkok Hotels
China Hotels
India Hotels

Donations

Home |News |Regional |Business |Opinion |Multimedia |Special Feature |Interview |Magazine |Burmese Elections 2010 |Archives |Research
Copyright © 2008 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved.