ARTICLE

RECOMMEND (156)

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PLUSONE

MORE

E-MAIL

PRINT

TEXT SIZE

Because democracy activists see themselves as fighting for what is clearly right, some believe they should not be subjected to criticism until the military regime is brought down and the playing field levelled.

Western-funded radio stations broadcasting into Burma have sought to present a range of views o­n political issues in Burma, but they too have been criticized for airing certain subjects, such as widely- circulating - but unconfirmed - rumors about Aung San Suu Kyi’s personal life.

The argument has also spread to the Net, where editors of o­nline news services have included “news” and editorials from the junta’s men. These mostly take the form of “Information Sheets” produced by the Directorate of Defense Services Intelligence, and articles from the state-controlled New Light of Myanmar.

The pieces are labelled as coming from the military regime, with the assumption being that readers would want to know what the government is saying, even if it’s not all based in fact. However, some exiled activists have asked why the editors are giving the regime a voice at all, especially since much of the material is propaganda.

Because accurate information about the political realities in Burma is so hard to come by, and the junta is doing what it can to control and manipulate the press, what news gets reported, and in what light, takes o­n a special significance.

Reporters must try to find ways to maneuver around a military regime bent o­n suppressing the truth, without sacrificing their own principles. At the same time, they should inform their readers of the limitations under which they are working.

Activists, meanwhile, should focus not so much o­n reacting to the regime as leading by example. In other words, they should try, as much as possible, to practice democracy, which includes allowing dissenting voices to be heard.

A free press is indispensable in the development and maintenance of a democratic society. The press not o­nly exposes abuses but also provides constructive analysis. This role is especially important in keeping politicians and the people o­n their toes so that policies remain fresh, honest and relevant.

Given the pressures under which journalists and activists are currently operating, an o­ngoing dialogue about the challenges of democracy and ethical reporting is essential.

Contributed by Ein Myaung, based in Thailand.