Burma's New Law of Assembly Falls Short: HRW
covering burma and southeast asia
Monday, April 23, 2018

Burma's New Law of Assembly Falls Short: HRW

By CHARLIE CAMPBELL / THE IRRAWADDY Thursday, March 15, 2012

Min Ko Naing, founder of the 88 Generation Students group, addresses a rally in Latt Padan Township. (Photo: Reuters)

Burma’s new law on the right to peaceful assembly has been heavily criticized by a leading human rights organization.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) said on Thursday that the Law Relating to Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession, signed by President Thein Sein on Dec. 2, falls well short of international standards.

The comments mirror accusations by pro-democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy (NLD) party concerning restrictions on campaign rallies. Access to prominent venues around Burma has repeatedly been denied as momentum grows in the run-up to the April 1 by-elections.

“Burma’s new law on assembly rejects the previous ban on demonstrations, but still allows the government to trump the Burmese people’s basic rights,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at HRW.

“There is a lot of excitement about changes in Burma these days, but the government shouldn’t be given credit for allowing some freedom just because none existed before. Instead, it should be pressed to make sure its laws meet international standards.”

Despite assurances from the Union Election Commission on Feb. 20 that restrictions on venues would be lifted, the NLD complained once again on March 9 that Suu Kyi had been blocked from speaking at Than Lwin Garden in the Mon State capital Moulmein. The party was instead offered a football field a third of the size six miles (10 km) outside of the city.

HRW urged the Thein Sein administration to repeal certain provisions that fail to meet international human rights standards, such as imprisonment as a penalty for permit violations.

The new assembly law requires anyone planning a demonstration to seek permission from the township police chief five days in advance. Permission is required for any gathering of “more than one person in a public area … in order to express their opinions.”

Holding an assembly without permission can result in a one-year prison sentence under the new legislation. Even if permission is granted, the assembly law provides criminal penalties of up to six months in prison for various types of conduct—such as giving speeches that contain false information, saying anything that could hurt the state and union, or “doing anything that causes fear, a disturbance or blocks roads, vehicles or the public.” These offenses are articulated in vague and uncertain terms, claims HRW.

“Requiring approval for the content of slogans shows just how far the government needs to go to understand basic freedoms,” said Adams. “Peaceful protesters shouldn’t go to jail just because a police officer may not like what they said.”

Burma has a long history of repression of peaceful protests. Pro-democracy marches in 1988 were put down by the authorities with lethal force. Security forces killed an estimated 3,000 protesters. Peaceful marches led by the opposition 88 Generation Students group in August 2007 and Buddhist monks in September 2007 were also violently crushed.

In 2011, the police forcibly dispersed several protests in the former capital Rangoon. One small protest on Oct. 27 led to the arrest of eight landless farmers and their activist lawyer Phoe Phyu for illegal assembly after they protested the forcible acquisition of their land by government-backed companies.

“The real test of new laws will be to see what happens when Burmese attempt to use them,” said Adams. “Burma’s government will deserve kudos for legal reform only when people are allowed to exercise their basic rights.”

Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.

Mg Min Nway Wrote:
Obviously,Thein Sein was not used to or not fully understand the basic human rights.It is possible that he was controlled by his old masters.He should not copy neither Singapore or Malaysia style human rights nor Putin's methods of election.
It will lead to Burmese Spring sooner or later.

Enjay Deems Wrote:
As one who has spent considerable time in Myanmar in the last 14 years and who has many close friends there, I can only say what many of my friends both local and foreign who also know and love Myanmar say viz: be careful of going too fast in pressing for total freedom and democracy or else you chance to lose a great deal.

Tai pan Wrote:
Please excuse my lack of firsthand knowledge .I have just read that the USA have donated US $ 1.5 million to a border relief fund.,much appreciated ,I'm sure.but why the he'll not $40 mill. They,ve just spent a gizziilion or two on that dreadful war in Afghanastan. What the hell

Oo Maung Gyi Wrote:
Ex-general Thein Sein who is now nominal President of Burma does not consider freedom of rights and freedom of peoples assembly and freedom of expression but since he has to follow the command from his higher commander he can not allow you what you expect like other democratic countries has.
As a matter of fact they still afraid of mass movement in democratic society. They want to control public like communist country. They do not know the basic rights of peoples, because they never and ever study this subject, but in their heart they understand that human being need freedoms, therefore Thein Sein making reforms for the sake of country and also for the sake of his master's sake for safety reasons of he and his family.

kerry Wrote:
Why not the same freedoms as all the free countries of the world?

Why not 21st century life? This is Burma, not Syria or China!

Why not?

more articles in this section