Burma: An End to Civil War?
covering burma and southeast asia
Saturday, May 04, 2024
Burma

NEWS ANALYSIS

Burma: An End to Civil War?


By SAW YAN NAING Friday, January 20, 2012


Ethnic Karen and Arakan soldiers wait in a village near the front-line in 2009. (Photo: Dai Kurokawa)
COMMENTS (8)
RECOMMEND (257)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

Foreign investors are among the observers anxiously watching events unfold in Burma, monitoring the new government's program of reforms, trying to lipread government officials and foreign diplomats for indications that economic sanctions might soon be lifted.

We have seen in recent weeks two of the three criteria met: the release of political prisoners; and a willingness to bring Aung San Suu Kyi and the opposition into the political fray.

The main obstacle remaining is unarguably the most difficult condition that Naypyidaw must fulfill: bringing a peaceful end to decades of civil war.

However, where just months ago the chasm of distrust between the warring sides appeared too ingrained to resolve, the recent statements issued by ethnic representatives following rounds of ceasefire talks have resounded of positive sound-bites.

Even when negotiations have broken down, both the government delegation and ethnic militias have agreed to further talks.

Of course, signing a truce and ceasing hostilities at the frontline can be diverging interests; but several observers say they believe the all-important political solution is closer to reality, while the military solution is more frequently being seen as outdated.

Perhaps, finally, Burma watchers say, one of the world's longest-running insurgencies is drawing to a close.

A look at the outcome of each ethnic group's bilateral talks with the Burmese government reveals that progress has indeed been made, but skepticism generally remains high.

Naypyidaw can take credit for a string of political coups—the apparent progress in relations with the the Karen, the Shan, the Chin and the Wa. And the domino effect of momentum has ensured negotiations with resistant ethnic militias, most notably, the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), have been rekindled.

According to Shan journalist Sai Murng, the ethnic rebels are “testing the waters” to see how their long-time enemy reacts.

On Jan. 12, the Karen National Union, seen by many as the keystone of the ethnic rebellion, signed a ceasefire agreement with a government peace delegation in Pa-an, tentatively ending a 63-year-long war.

KNU peace negotiator Saw David Taw said, “We have been fighting and demanding our rights for a long time. Now, because we see the government attempting to find a peaceful solution, I think the armed conflict will end slowly and step by step.

“The modern world does not support solutions by military means. War is out of date in this age,” he said. However, the KNU will hold on to their weapons for self-protection “just in case,” he said.

Although it is very early days, no reports of a breakdown in the ceasefire have been reported.

David Taw noted that the previous ceasefire, in 2004, had been a verbal agreement. He said he believed last week's signed ceasefire was evidence of steps toward a “real peace.”

The estimated 3,000 fighting men of the Shan State Army–South (SSA–South) have also enjoyed a time-out in hostilities since the group reached an 11-point plan for a ceasefire on Dec. 2, its first truce with the Burmese army after decades of continual conflict.

Maj Sai Lao Hseng, the main spokesperson for the SSA–South, said that military resistance was not the solution to Burma's ethnic conflicts—only political agreements.

The SSA-South says it now plans to officially reopen its liaison offices around Shan State.

Also based in Shan State, the United Wa State Army, the largest ethnic rebel group in the country with an estimated 30,000 troops, partnered by its ethnic allies the Mongla Group, also reached ceasefire agreements with Naypyidaw in December.

Non-ceasefire groups are watching these agreements closely and with due caution.

Nai Hang Thar, the secretary of the New Mon State Party (NMSP), said, “If all the other ethnic armed groups make peace deals with the government, we will also follow suit.”

However, he said that he doubted the government could maintain truces in the region, and cited as evidence its continuous attacks against strongholds of the KIO in Kachin and Shan states.

The NMSP has met several times with government delegations, but failed to come to any agreement.

However, other ethnic representatives who have sat around the table in recent months with the so-called Union Level Peace Discussion Group leaders have praised the government delegation for its sincerity and most agreed that Naypyidaw's approach this time is much different from previous meetings when their delegates were often described as “arrogant.”

The ethnic sources said that the new government delegation has a higher authority, and includes decision-makers such as Aung Min, the Minster for Railways, who is close to the office of President Thein Sein.



1  |  2  next page »

COMMENTS (8)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

TT Wrote:
24/01/2012
Hey everybody. Today i just listen Zar Di Man song and feel like We Kachin are totally different with Burmese. Why is that? Please Answer!

U Ko Wrote:
23/01/2012
One country should have one (federal or national ) army only. There should be no 2 or 3 or 4 armies in one state.Any armed group tried to set its own army in its region,there will be no eternal peace and rule of laws forever. This is what happened with KIA,I think. Whatever ceasefire agreement made among themselves should be a temporary solution. But it is necessary as a first step.All parties should talk with their hearts rather than lips & brains. Myanmar the whole country is owned by and belong to all of our brother ethnic nationalities.Not necessary to fight each other on purposely to extend its own territory.

A.M.O Wrote:
22/01/2012
Yes, good question- An end to civil war ?

NO ! It will never end as long as the mindsets of these guys will never change since day one (2 March 1962):

These guys are:

-Gen Ne Win
-Gen Than Shwe
-(Gen) U Thein Sein

Fat Hope !


Uraw GamB Wrote:
22/01/2012
Government must be brave enough to withdraw the troops from the conflict zones must jointly work out the security guardian duties and responsibilities among the Thatmadaw and the Ethnic armies. The ethnic armies must be trusted and be given appropriate status in the Union army without effecting their present organization structure. If not, just impossible to reach to the peace. The dormancy period of the war can be broken anytime.

Oo Maung Gyi Wrote:
21/01/2012
Burma civil war is not only fighting with arms and arms but also civilians ( Un-arms ) groups are fighting with the military government since 1962. Therefore ceasefire alone can not solve Burma political problems. Political problems are to be solved by sittings and negotiations. Ethnics problems are enormouse, therefore it needs to discuss on round table to solve, otherwise there will be civil war again. Burma has political, social, religious, economical, geopolitical, racial problems
and son on. All the problems should place on the table and solve for everlasting.

Rockderk Wrote:
21/01/2012
How can there be an end to hostilities between the Govt. troops and various minorities when the government has already written the rulebook, pardoned itself for anything it did in the past and sold half the country to Thai and Chinese business interests? Until there is a real general election and a referendum on whether to keep the current get-out-of-jail-free card written by the junta, or adopt a genuine constitution for the peoples of Burma, any real end to the conflict will not be possible.

Yebaw Wrote:
21/01/2012
All the efforts, free the political prisoners, peace with minority groups and collaborative with NLD, made by Thein Sein's government is top of the above of all efforts made by the past governments.
This time, in terms of peace and tranquility in Burma is the best in my life.
If President U Thein Sein could end the civil war, this is the beginning of our country to march on the right path.

Moe Aung Wrote:
21/01/2012
It's called going through the motions...a means to a certain end, only not an end to the civil war but to the sanctions. Shortsighted maybe, but genuine peace and national reconciliation is not what they are after.

more articles in this section