A Letter from Arakan State
covering burma and southeast asia
Friday, April 19, 2024
Burma

A Letter from Arakan State


By PYI SAUNT Thursday, September 2, 2010


In this 2009 photo, Burmese Rohingya boy waits for a fishing boat to come in so he can make small money carrying the fish to shore in Sittwe, Arakan state. (Photo: Getty Images)
COMMENTS (26)
RECOMMEND (363)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT

MAUNGDAW, Arakan State — Let’s say you are a minority group in your native place. You’re surrounded by a majority group that came from a foreign country that has threatened your minority group throughout history.

In this community, you are vulnerable to being robbed, tortured and killed anytime; your wife, your sisters, your daughters risk being sexually abused; your property could be stolen and your minority group could be attacked at any time.

These fears are common to the Buddhist minority in Buthidaung and Maungdaw townships in northern Arakan State in western Burma, where decades-long racial and religious tensions have festered between the Rakhine Buddhist majority and the so-called Rohingya or Bengali minority.

Echoing a common concern among Rakhines in the area, one elder said, “We feel unsafe here, even though this land is ours. We’re just a minority here, and we could be erased at any time."

In Buthidaung and Maungdaw—2 of 17 townships of Arakan (also known as Rakhine) State— Rohingyas make up more than 85 percent of the population in Buthidaung Township and over 95 percent in Maungdaw Township. Buddhist Rakhine and other ethnic people are a minority in these two townships. In Rathaedaung Township, about 50 percent of population is reportedly Bengali, although some believe that number could be much higher.

According to government figures, about 30 percent of the total population of Arakan State are Bengali. There are about 3 million people in the state, which is 36,762 square km. While the population of Rakhine increases slowly, the Bengali population is increasing rapidly.

The Rakhine are well known for its strong nationalism and belief in Buddhism. Generally, they say they won't marry Muslims, citing racial and religious differences. In their eyes, Muslim Bengali have invaded their land.

On the other hand, Muslims don’t want to be viewed as Bengali migrants or descendants of Bengali migrants. They see themselves as a Burmese ethnic group, with the same privileges as other citizens. There have been bloody clashes .

Complaints, complaints, complaints

While traveling in Arakan State, I heard a lot of complaints from Buddhist Rakhines, who say the Rohingya are favored by international and humanitarian organizations, which don't give Rakhine concerns and fears equal weight.
The Rakhine also accuse UN agencies and NGOs of bias and discrimination, opening most of their job opportunities to Rohingya.

The Rakhiness are also angry that the UN and international agencies use the word “Rohingya” for people they view as Bengali migrants, no matter how often Rakhine and Burmese historians say the word accurately describes a Burmese ethnic group.

“Are they [UN and international agencies] lazy to learn a true history, or are they ambassadors for Muslim separatists who want to loot our land?” asked one Rakhine observer in Maungdaw.

Rakhine politicians and historians contend that the word “Rohingya” was coined by educated Bengali Muslim politicians, and that there are political motives behind the word. They say Bengali migrants want to claim Buthidaung, Maungdaw, and Rathaedaung as an autonomous region, for which they need to be recognized as ethic people. Until 1951, there was no word “Rohingya,” say Rakhine politicians.

Rakhine also complain that the international community and humanitarian agencies turn a blind eye to crimes and atrocities committed by Rohingyas.

When it's getting dark, Rakhine people say they don't feel safe to walk through a village of Bengali migrants for fear of being killed. They say a gang of Bengali migrants are robbering and terrorizing villages near Burthidaung.

 Poverty  everywhere

Like other parts of the country, this northwestern suffering great poverty. Many children are kept out of school to help earn an income for their family. A small number of people are lucky to have so-called decent jobs, such as trading.

In addition, Bengali migrants are undeniably living under several restrictions imposed by the government. They must have permissions to marry and to travel from one township to another. The government receives regular complaints from the international community and humanitarian organizations.

Exposing these hardships, exiled Rohingya activists seek help from the international community to put pressure on the ruling junta to recognize the Rohingya as one of Burmese ethnic groups, and to grant them citizenship.

“We just want a status that can guarantee our human rights, for which we need to be recognized as an ethnic people and citizens,” said a Bengali man.



1  |  2  next page »

COMMENTS (26)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

Moe Gyaw Wrote:
07/09/2010
Hello Freeman
The article from rohingya.org is fatally flawed in terms of historical facts. Another thing is that article doesn't appear on any other websites other than rohingya.org and rohingya.info. Copy a piece of text and paste it in google. You will see it looks fishy in the eye of google.

Free Man Wrote:
06/09/2010
Thanks for posting this, MA.
http://www.rohingya.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=75&Itemid=33
What a mess! In general, the
Buddhists of Burma fear that Buddhism will fall into oblivion. Muslims think the rest of the human race who do not share their beliefs are infidels. Christians think their god is the only true supernatural being on this planet. etc. etc. So, they have converted, quarrelled, slaughtered, oppressed and discriminated against each other where they are in the majority throughout world history. However, some religions have relatively evolved/been reformed because of the onslaught of free thinkers and scientific progress. Unfortunately, Islam is not one of them and poses a threat to humanity. So, we should deal with it, and this should only be in a civilized manner.
http://richarddawkins.net/articles/505113-silence-is-not-moderation
Regarding the ethnic aspect of the issue, I just want to say that we must respect the principles of human rights.

Saw Tin Maung Wrote:
05/09/2010
I agree with U kyaw Tin. This is the true.
U Kyaw Maung, the Chairman of Rakhine State People's Council in 1980 was a Bengali Rakhine.
U BA Kyaw, former Immigration Head officer in Maungdaw, U Wai Tha Maung (father-in-law of USDP chairman Tun Hla Sein) business man, Boyar Mg Gyi(also known lip service Mg Gyi), etc...
Most of the Rakhinese in Maungdaw got Bangladeshi ID card and mobile phones. Nobody will deny it.

Ko Zaw Wrote:
05/09/2010
If anyone want to know/to be experienced how the Buddhists of Arakan attack Muslims,just go to Main road (Lann Ma Gyi) of Sittway with any Muslim identity, like wearing a Muslim cap after sunset without making any sounds/doing any unethical things.Only the bones will be left if you are lucky enough. This is my experience, I was in Sittway for 3 years for my studies.

Ko Zaw Zaw Wrote:
05/09/2010
Most of the scholars, especially racist Rakhine, say that Bengalis are migrating to Arakan. That is correct, but not Bengali Muslims, most of them are Buddhist because they get support from locals who are the same faith with them and can easily mix with them. Local Buddhists want to increase the manpower and they systematically support the migration of Buddhists from Bangla. You can find that most of the traders and businessmen in Sittway are Buddhists from Bangla.
Foreign Muslims do not migrate to Arakan because the rights of the muslim minority in Arakan are restricted and they are systematically persecuted by Buddhists and the SPDC government. Muslims are just going out of Arakan because nobody wants to live in such a situation and Buddhists from Bangla are easily flowing to Arakan with the help of local Buddhists and they are enjoying every rights.

Moe Gyaw Wrote:
04/09/2010
There is one similarity between the military government and the Bengalis; that is - deny all the disclosures over their wrongdoing as much as they can until any strong evidence such as a video clip or a photo surfaces.

Some unsuspecting foreigners seem to believe their story partly due to common hatred towards the military government. As a result, the dark side of those illegal immigrants are shrouded and they are seen as the most pitiful people on earth. What a joke!

Be aware that they are the same people with the same religion, the same culture and the same goal as the terrorists of September 11th.

Arakan Wrote:
04/09/2010
Hi Pyi Saunt, come back to Buthidaung and Maungdaw again if you are dare. You will see the meaning of Jihad from our Rohingya.

Moe Aung Wrote:
04/09/2010
The Muslim “Rohingya” of Burma

by Martin Smith

posted by
ARAKAN ROHINGYA NATIONAL ORGANISATION
11 October 2006

http://www.rohingya.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=75&Itemid=33

Student Wrote:
03/09/2010
I was born and grew up in Buthidaung. Our Rakhine teachers use to release us from tuition class before sunset not because our teachers were afraid us (Rohingya) but because he/she knew if our class lasted after sunset we could be attacked by Rakhine any time. I still remember we need to pay 1000 kyats as bribe to a Rakhine youth (maung ning soe) from ward No.5 to play football at Buthidaung football ground. The Rakhine comprise less than 10% in Buthidaung metropolitan area, still we Rohingya never dared to be outside after nine pm. How could brother Pyi Saunt come to say they are in danger? Doesn't brother Pyi Saunt know that at least one Rohingya is being beaten every night by the Rakhine in Buthidaung? How many Rakhines are being attacked by Rohingya?

Kyaw Tin Wrote:
03/09/2010
Dear Editor, the author and other readers,
The author seems to be a racist and he does not know the real situation of both Rohingya and Rakhine. Both Rohingya and Rakhine suffered differently under the iron heel of ruling junta.

Of course there are many illegal immigrants in Maungdaw. The Rakhine population of Maungdaw has come from Bangladesh in the early seventies and they hold dual citizenship. For example, U Kyaw Maung, the Chairman of Rakhine State People's Council in 1980 was a Bengali Rakhine and he penetrated into the political sphere of Burma and he became a cadre for the BSPP. A Township Immigration Officer of Maungdaw Townhip was a Bengali Rakhine and the goverment revealed this and he was fired from his job. I can point out each and every Rakhine Bengali personally. The last migration of Rakhine from Bangladesh to Rakhine State was in 2003 as they were resettled near 3 mile and the village was named as Vesali. The illegal migrations continued through the porous border

Ko Ko Linn Wrote:
03/09/2010
Most Rakhine from Buthidaung and Maungdaw have a strong sentiments against Rohingya. Like Pyi Saunt, many other Rakhine intellectuals are the same. He said the historical background written by their people is the truth but they are unaware of what they did during 26 years of BSPP tenure.

The UN agencies are presently eyewitnesses for what is going on over there in the region.
Of course, what Pyi Saunt wrote is as undeniable as the restrictions and discrimination by SPDC against the Rohingya. We are well aware that many Rakhine also fled and asked for or got assistance from UN and others. In this way thousand of Rakhine have been settled into a third country because of SPDC violations against them.

khala Meah Wrote:
03/09/2010
I thought the ethnic Rakhine was a very civilized and politically advanced communty, but it was proven that they are very backward, rude and uncivilized. By posting such a nonsensical and illogical letter, they have also shown that they are extremely foolish racists.

mong ching pru Wrote:
03/09/2010
Irrawaddy is not neutral - but it is objective. The Rohingya issue or the Bengali Muslims of Maungdaw-Buthidaung issue should be considered in the history of the Partition - that of India and Pakistan in 1947. From then on, Pakistan as a Muslim country and Muslim sympathizer has been conducting secret missions in the South Asia. For some time in the 1960s and 1970s there was a demand for the creation of a Muslim Bangla comprised of the western Bengali majority districts of Burma, and the eastern states of North East India. With the birth of Bangladesh in 1971, it just vanished - but did it really? In the 1971 war of Bangladesh Liberation, the people in Arakan State, especially the Rakhine community, gave shelter to countless Bengali refugees - feeding them till they returned home safely after the Liberation. This should be written down in the history of Bangladesh - if that is to be objective. But the Rohingyas - for reasons best known to them - sided with the Pakistanis.

Am I wrong?

Maung Arkar Wrote:
03/09/2010
This is complete rubbish and these Rakhines cannot see the Rohingya faces and start writing things like that. These Rakhines are always rude towards Rohingyas and this is an attempt to disrupt things before the election. And, if something happens, the Rakhines will put the blames on Rohingyas.

Nyi Nyi Wrote:
03/09/2010
The Rakhine want to be kind and proud of Arakan history through hiding reality. Historically, the Rakhines have never been displaced by Rohingya or Arakan Muslim but Arakan Muslims were displaced when Rakhines or Burmans came into power in 1784 under King Bodaw, 1942 by U Kyaw Khine, in the bloodshed in 1967 in Kyauktaw and others campaigns of repression like Nagamin-1978, Pyitaya-1992 and etc...

Does it matter if they are Bangali or Rohingya?
Lack of recognition is that
1)when Burman occupied Arakan in 1406, Rakhine king Min-Saw-Mon sought refuge for 24 years in Bangaladesh and restored Mrauk U dynasty under Muslim titles.
2) Bodaw paya invasion in 1784 made both Rakhines and Rohingyas flee the country and they reentered when British law was installed.
3) Rakhine U Kyaw Khine's xenophobia in 1942 expelled Rohingyas again and they were able to reenter by Gen.Aung Sann in 1945.

We in the Rohingya community are collecting a list of Rohingya displacements and the ethnic cleansing under recent military rule will be proven.

Abumahiya Wrote:
03/09/2010
The theme of the letter is the old poison of mr. Khing maung in a new bottle, though the style of bottling is different.

shwemyanmar Wrote:
03/09/2010
What a pitiful hyena complaining about already dead deer! Very funny!!

C K Lay Wrote:
03/09/2010
Finally, Irrawaddy found tiny (tiny) gut to publish a story from two sides. Still they tried to taint the story theme by posting a picture of a Rohingya boy on top of the story. How cunning!
Or does The Irrawaddy have a picture of a poor since they only collect Rohingya material? Let me know if you need some. I have tons.

Maung Wrote:
03/09/2010
I lived in Maungdaw and I am Rohingya. I know the truth. The article would be right if it were the other way round.

Thein Aung Wrote:
03/09/2010
This article is correct. Native rakhine will nearly loose their land after election. Rakhine people have maintained Arakan for centuries but current situation is really bad. Muslim organizations are so strong and they can finance Muslims in Arakan, even in world trade center in New Yorr, US.

And the Burmese central gov is really corrupted too. They don't care if they sacrafice Rakhine to get vote from Muslims. Burning, torturing, beheading will be coming soon as in other muslim's countries.

The UN is as usual as stupid. If Rohingya is hot topic for them, they will follow it.

Israel and US must support minority Rakhine people.

Dewar Wrote:
03/09/2010
My own experience: in August 2009, a French NGO based in Yangon circulated an ad for an interpreter to work for a project in northern Arakan, saying that applicants must be fluent in English and Arakanese. Having fluency in both English, which I have been using for more 10 years for work, oral and writen, and Arakanese, my mother tongue, I applied for the job, submiting my CV as well as testimonials from my international friends. I exchanged a few letters with the NGO's headquarters in Paris and got an appointment for a personal interview by their officer, who marveled at my command of English and agreed to hire me for the project. But before we concluded the interview, the officer went upstairs and chatted with some Bangali men for a while, came down and asked me again if I spoke Rohingya. I said no and asked him if he knew what Rohingya is. He just bluntly said no idea. I continued to tell him that the ad did not metion any Rohingya language knowledge but Arakanese! Stupid Agencies!!

Moe Aung Wrote:
03/09/2010
History repeating itself and a sense of déjà vu for the Rakhine.

U Nu in the run up to the 1960 elections came up with the term ethnic 'Burmese' Rohingya for their votes. Today's USDP too wants their votes, and the regime happily turns its stance of persecution and exclusion on its head. Political expedience rules the day once again, and damn the consequences.

Htwe Nu Wrote:
02/09/2010
I just would like to ask you, the editor of The Irrawaddy, whether you know the real history of the Rohingya and Rakhine? Do you know the history of Arakan? Do you know how the world population became distributed?

Do you know that neither rohingya nor rakhine came out of the Arakan's soil? I would like to kindly suggest that you, as editor, better learn these things before publishing this kind of racist article in this civilized community that knows what human rights are.

thihajarmal Wrote:
02/09/2010
Dear Author of this Article,
You should know that international agencies and other ethnic groups from Burma are not blindfolded to history. They know the true history of Arakan, not the one like you turned upside down.

In truth, Arakan belongs to both Rakhine and Rohingya. You claim that there was no such name as Rohingya in Burma. So how come Rohingya have a Radio news programme until 1976? I simply request you just look back at history in detail before writing an article like this. Don't lower youself and the news website by writing such nonsense. We all are brothers and sisters within Arakan State regardless of race and religion.

Nurul Islam(a) Kyaw Swe Wrote:
02/09/2010
I must say with grief that Mr.Pyi Saunt is quite wrong. He wrote that The Rakhine are vulnerable in Maung Daw, Buthi Daung and Rathedaung.But the reality is that The rohingya Muslims are 100% vulnerable because they are passing their life in Arakan under severe restrictions of Junta. But Junta imposed no restriction on the Rakhine due to religious and racial discrimination. Historically Arakan is the native land of Rohingya Muslims.They never wanted Arakan an independent state of Rohingyas. Rather they are living by maintaining peaceful co-existence with the Rakhine brothers. In return The Rakhine with the help of the Junta are trying to eliminate Rohingyas from their ancestral land, Arakan. The Rohingyas are crying only for retrieving their fundemental rights.This is the reality.

Nurul

U Maung Lay Wrote:
02/09/2010
I did have a respect for Irrawaddy for very neutral in their previous reports on Rohingya issues. But my respect has gone now. How a community without have a single human right can attack other community who have all their rights with them. Is it logical?. Go and see the differences of monasteries and Mosques there. Only fools will believe the articles above. UN and other agencies help Rohingyas because they know the truth.

more articles in this section