A 'No' Vote Means 'Let's Have a Dialogue'
covering burma and southeast asia
Saturday, April 20, 2024
Magazine

EDITOR'S PERSPECTIVE

A 'No' Vote Means 'Let's Have a Dialogue'


By KYAW ZWA MOE MAY, 2008 - VOLUME 16 NO.5


COMMENTS (0)
RECOMMEND (427)
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
PLUSONE
 
MORE
E-MAIL
PRINT
(Page 2 of 2)

Recently, the UN special envoy to Burma, Ibrahim Gambari, told The Irrawaddy, “I do not see an alternative to dialogue.” Unfortunately, we see many alternatives to a dialogue—all of them bad for Burmese citizens.

The May 10 referendum may well be a springboard to more bloodshed, pain and suffering. Or, it may offer some hope for positive change.

The real power to determine the country’s future remains in the hands of the junta and the upper-level officer corps, which has remained loyal to misguided dictators since 1988.

We are living in dangerous times, but a “No” vote is the best option for Burmese citizens to bring about a dialogue.



« previous  1  |  2  | 

COMMENTS (0)
 
Please read our policy before you post comments. Click here
Name:
E-mail:   (Your e-mail will not be published.)
Comment:
You have characters left.
Word Verification: captcha Type the characters you see in the picture.
 

more articles in this section